Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung's reply to Lou-Feb 28 Dr. Bob

Posted by Lou Pilder on August 15, 2007, at 6:32:56

In reply to Re: Lou's reply, posted by Dr. Bob on July 30, 2007, at 13:07:23

> > could not also all other statements that have been notated as being uncivil here also be tranferred to a table of contents to be fair?
> Thanks, I'd like to focus on moving forward.
> Bob

DR. Hsiung,
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here by your reply to me,[...I'd like to focus on moving forward...].
One of the generally accepted meanings of {move} is to {proceed}. I also would like to move or proceed if that is the meaning that you are wanting to mean here.
One of the generally accepted meanings of {forward} is that one is {going toward a goal}. The goal in our discussion that goes back to at least February 28, 2007 is concerning your action that you have taken in posting that you think that it is good for a member here to preface a statement that is not approved with {I believe} to have it approved by you here when you have posted your standard here that it doesn't matter if one believes something to make an unapproved statement approved. If this is going to be the case from here on, could one could post statements that could have the potential to lead a Jew to feel accused and/or put down and preface them with {I believe}to be approved by you?
One of the generally accepted meanings of {focus} is to give rise to an image that is clearly perceived. I also agree with you that we could go forward to have our discussion achieve a clear perception of the actions that you have taken, your policy in your TOS, your rules, and your rationales for what we are discussing here.
If you are taking the position that a Jew could not be led to feel accused and/or put down by reading the statement in question, then I would like for you to post here (A)your rationale for that including the generally accepted meaning of {put down} in any reply to me here and (B) the generally accepted meaning of the conjunction {but} and the grenerally accepted meaning of {came by} and (C) the use of the statement in the doctrine of {replacement theology} that has been used for centuries and (D) to do a search using [replacement theology,millions] to include what you could read in that search as pertaing to millions of Jews in relation to {replacement theology}.
Then, if after you could do that, could you post here any authority that says that a Jew is not likely to feel put down when the statement in question has been used for 2000 years to promulgate {replacement theology}?
Lou PIlder




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:737093