![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 12 to 36 of 37. Go back in thread:
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 18, 2015, at 8:53:22
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-The Great Deception, posted by Lou Pilder on June 17, 2015, at 14:46:33
> > > > Friends,
> > > > Many of you already know that I have been writing about a new way of living so that you could be delivered from bondage and unshackled from your drugs. Gone will be the dark clouds and the cold winds and you will be led to a new realm where there is light forever more. This light will dispel the darkness and shine in your hearts to give you a new heart and a new spirit.
> > > > And many of you already know that Mr. Hsiung has made prohibitions to me here that turn off the light that could save your life, prevent life-ruining conditions and addictions. But what is this light? How can this light penetrate your being to generate a new heart and a new spirit that heals so that you could be free from the slavery of drugs and go back to the green fields that you used to know, where you will be kissed by the Sun.
> > > > This light was there in the beginning. For the scriptures that the Jews use say that in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth but it was dark, without light. But then God said , "Let there be light." What is this light? The sun was not created yet, nor the moon. My friends, this light was life. Life eternal, life without death. It is this light that could shine in your hearts so that death will be dispelled from you. And I have chosen you to be the recipients of this light to have your suffering and death be cast out. I may not be able to complete this to you due to the prohibitions to me, but by reading this you are called to know this. What a great opportunity. For many are called , but few are chosen.
> > > > Lou
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > Phillipa writes here about that there is hope in what I write here. And this hope has the power to have you be able to overcome addiction and depression from these drugs that are promoted here. You see, when the light was brought forth by the God that the Jews give service and worship to, the light was life itself and the light was the God that created the heavens and the Earth, for this God is life and light. And he separated the light from the darkness, for in the darkness, life could not exist.
> > > And today, we are confronted with light and darkness, life and death. And it has been revealed to me that there are two minds, one in darkness and the other having the light of God impregnated into it that can overcome addiction and depression and have the darkness dispelled. The mind impregnated with the light of God allows one to enter a new realm of peace and joy to be unshackled from the slavery of mind-altering drugs and depression.
> > > You see, it has been revealed to me that this God is a sun. Not a natural sun but a spiritual sun. It is a Sun of Righteousness with healing in his rays. This Sun dispels the darkness and healing can come into a person. You can not look at this Sun anymore than you could look at the natural sun. But you can find the Sun of righteousness. You can find it if you seek it, but many will keep you from finding it. They will use all manner of evil to accomplish that one does not find the Sun of Righteousness. For without finding Him, they stay on a Road that leads to death. And many there go that way to their deaths without finding the Road to Life, for few there be that find it.
> > > Lou
> >
> > Friends,
> > Finding the Road that leads to life is to follow the Sun of righteousness. And there are those chosen to lead you to the Sun and the Light that leads to life. And there are those that will misdirect you to the road that leads to death.
> > But who could lead you to the light? When I had an encounter with a Rider on a white horse He said to me, "Arise,shine; for your light has come and the glory of the Lord is risen upon you. For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the people: but the Lord shall arise upon you; and his glory shall be seen upon you for salvation is of the Jews."
> > Friends, those that could lead you to the light are the Jews. That is why those that promote anti-Semitism want others to hate the Jews, for they could lead you to salvation and life, and the Jew-hater hates life and embraces death.
> > Be not deceived, for this hatred was there in the beginning as the serpent beguiled Eve with the Great Lie. The serpent is the father of lies, the Prince of darkness, the Prince of death. And his followers want you to go down the road that leads to death and by inducing hatred toward the Jews that could lead you to the Sun of righteousness, you could be beguiled like Eve was by the serpent and die.
> > Lou
>
> Friends,
> Many of you already know that I have been writing here telling readers that I am prevented from posting here The Great Deception as revealed to me due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. By you not having that information from me, you could be easily influenced, for it is so easy to influence the uninformed.
> This Great Deception was in the beginning. It came from a lie. And lies deceive. And I am prevented from exposing the lies here due to the prohibitions to me by Mr. Hsiung.
> But do you want to follow liars and deceivers? Are you beguiled by the serpent, which is the devil, to believe a lie?
> I want everyone to be filled with the light of life. For that light will dispel the darkness of deceit and you will be free from the bondage of your drugs, free from addiction and death from them. For I do not want anyone to suffer a horrible death by them. But the lies of darkness that are persuading you from The Prince of Death are still going out to the world as it was in the beginning to keep one from the light of life of the Sun of righteousness with healing in his rays.
> I have come here to lead you to the light of life that could forever expose the lies from the Prince of Death where all lies originate. And in that encounter with the Rider on a white horse, I asked about the light of life and He said to me, "It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh profits nothing; the words that I speak to you, they are spirit and they are life."
> LouFriends,
Do you want to follow deceivers to your death? Let us look at this article.
Lou
To see this bring up Google and type in:
[Deadly Medicines How Big Pharma, by Peter Golzsche]
Could be first and was posted on Sept 9, 2013
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 19, 2015, at 5:45:23
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-Let there be light-, posted by Lamdage22 on June 17, 2015, at 15:43:53
> How is it to be a jew, what do jews believe?
>
> Are you seriously telling me that the man can not post about his religion on this board?Lamdage22,
It is much worse than that. For not only is the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me prohibited by Mr. Hsiung for me to post here, anti-Semitic hate is allowed to flourish with his use of this forum to allow anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive and civil here, all along with his vision that sometime in the future by him allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him, that it will be good for his community as a whole to do so.
The orchestration is accomplished by his use of his deputies of record and having members in concert with him that post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity, and worse, that anti-Semitic hate is created and developed by him by the use of using discrimination in his administraion of his rules, which is an abuse of power, that could result IMHO in anti-Semitic violence perpetrated by readers here that see that a psychiatrist is claiming that by him allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to stand, that it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole.
This is nothing new, but an old tactic to arouse hatred toward the Jews that has resulted in millions of Jewish children being murdered and then when his own post here displays the swastika, there could be ratification of what a subset of readers could think as that he is ratifying the hatred toward the Jews that is allowed to be seen as supportive here by him. This IMHHHHHO could trigger a subset of readers here that take mind-altering drugs allowed to be promoted here to commit mass-murder against Jews and other minorities as hate crimes that they could think that they are doing good as Mr. Hsiung states that whatever he does, it is because in his thinking it will be good for his community as a whole so that others could think that racism or anti-Semitism will be good for their community as a whole also, for it is a powerful influence for a psychiatrist to post the swastika and refuse to delete it which could lead a subset of vulnerable readers to think that he is endorsing the swastika as to what it stands for.
Here in [admin, 428781 ] we can see the start of him changing his rules to allow anti-Semitic hate to be seen without his tagline to be civil. But worse, his rules to me prevent me from posting my own repudiation to the anti-Semitic hate being allowed to be posted without his tagline to be civil. In fact, even more prohibitions were posted to me by Mr. Hsiung that prevents me from exposing the relationship between psychiatry and mass-murder. Please take a look at [ admin, 428781 ], for this is where darkness started to come over this forum to shut off the light.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 19, 2015, at 9:46:31
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-Let there be light- » Lamdage22, posted by Lou Pilder on June 19, 2015, at 5:45:23
> > How is it to be a jew, what do jews believe?
> >
> > Are you seriously telling me that the man can not post about his religion on this board?
>
> Lamdage22,
> It is much worse than that. For not only is the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me prohibited by Mr. Hsiung for me to post here, anti-Semitic hate is allowed to flourish with his use of this forum to allow anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive and civil here, all along with his vision that sometime in the future by him allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him, that it will be good for his community as a whole to do so.
> The orchestration is accomplished by his use of his deputies of record and having members in concert with him that post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity, and worse, that anti-Semitic hate is created and developed by him by the use of using discrimination in his administraion of his rules, which is an abuse of power, that could result IMHO in anti-Semitic violence perpetrated by readers here that see that a psychiatrist is claiming that by him allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to stand, that it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole.
> This is nothing new, but an old tactic to arouse hatred toward the Jews that has resulted in millions of Jewish children being murdered and then when his own post here displays the swastika, there could be ratification of what a subset of readers could think as that he is ratifying the hatred toward the Jews that is allowed to be seen as supportive here by him. This IMHHHHHO could trigger a subset of readers here that take mind-altering drugs allowed to be promoted here to commit mass-murder against Jews and other minorities as hate crimes that they could think that they are doing good as Mr. Hsiung states that whatever he does, it is because in his thinking it will be good for his community as a whole so that others could think that racism or anti-Semitism will be good for their community as a whole also, for it is a powerful influence for a psychiatrist to post the swastika and refuse to delete it which could lead a subset of vulnerable readers to think that he is endorsing the swastika as to what it stands for.
> Here in [admin, 428781 ] we can see the start of him changing his rules to allow anti-Semitic hate to be seen without his tagline to be civil. But worse, his rules to me prevent me from posting my own repudiation to the anti-Semitic hate being allowed to be posted without his tagline to be civil. In fact, even more prohibitions were posted to me by Mr. Hsiung that prevents me from exposing the relationship between psychiatry and mass-murder. Please take a look at [ admin, 428781 ], for this is where darkness started to come over this forum to shut off the light.
> LouLamdage22,
The darkness of hate can be facilitated in many ways, one being discrimination by the administration of a group that could induce what psychologists call a collective psychopathy which is how anti-Semitism is created and developed by the leaders of a group.
The discrimination here involves what is known as two standards, one for the group and one for the Jewish member, myself. The standard is that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record will respond according to his TOS to members sending a notification that a post could be against the rules, but could not respond to mine so that others will also not respond to me. Not only, does that allow anti-Semitic propaganda to stand, but it stigmatizes me as being inferior to the non-Jews here in that I can be discriminated upon with impunity by the deputies of record and Mr. Hsiung by the unequal application of his rules which deny me equal protection from the harm of discrimination and defamation and anti-Semitism. And worse, readers could act out in real world communities violence toward Jews and others also to lead a subset of psychopaths to commit mass-murder, for anti-Semitism is a form of racism that could be transferred to racist ideology to have not only Jews to be targets of hate, but other minorities as well. This could include those of non-white races, those with un popular sexual orientations, and anyone else that the hatred toward the Jews as being allowed to be seen as supportive here could be transferred to.
Psychologists write about that hate could also be transferred to themselves and cause suicide to those that are led to believe that Jews are inferior people, or anyone else is an inferior human being. And when mind-altering drugs are put into the person that sees anti-Semitism as being supportive here, the acting out of mass-murder gets a great boost from thinking that anti-Semitism will be good for any community as a whole. Many leaders have said that in the past and they were killed by their own populace when they saw through the deceit of hate, or they killed themselves or were executed as war criminals. When will they ever learn.
Lou
here is a post showing the discrimination against me that stigmatizes me as inferior as my notifications for years remain outstanding which allows the anti-Semitism to stand. For if they were acted on, then I could have the hate stopped here. By the deputies of record and Mr. Hsiung being indifferent to my pleas to stop the hate, anti-Semitism could be created and developed here with impunity, for even if another member notified the same post, in order for them to perpetuate the indifference, they could also not act on their notification to keep mine un acted on. This is nothing new, but an old way that perverts the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States and other countries where Jefferson wrote, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. And later in the Constitution the equal protection of the laws as to the 14th amendment.
Let us look at this post:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1054184.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 19, 2015, at 11:27:29
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-Let there be light-drknes, posted by Lou Pilder on June 19, 2015, at 9:46:31
> > > How is it to be a jew, what do jews believe?
> > >
> > > Are you seriously telling me that the man can not post about his religion on this board?
> >
> > Lamdage22,
> > It is much worse than that. For not only is the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me prohibited by Mr. Hsiung for me to post here, anti-Semitic hate is allowed to flourish with his use of this forum to allow anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive and civil here, all along with his vision that sometime in the future by him allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him, that it will be good for his community as a whole to do so.
> > The orchestration is accomplished by his use of his deputies of record and having members in concert with him that post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity, and worse, that anti-Semitic hate is created and developed by him by the use of using discrimination in his administraion of his rules, which is an abuse of power, that could result IMHO in anti-Semitic violence perpetrated by readers here that see that a psychiatrist is claiming that by him allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to stand, that it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole.
> > This is nothing new, but an old tactic to arouse hatred toward the Jews that has resulted in millions of Jewish children being murdered and then when his own post here displays the swastika, there could be ratification of what a subset of readers could think as that he is ratifying the hatred toward the Jews that is allowed to be seen as supportive here by him. This IMHHHHHO could trigger a subset of readers here that take mind-altering drugs allowed to be promoted here to commit mass-murder against Jews and other minorities as hate crimes that they could think that they are doing good as Mr. Hsiung states that whatever he does, it is because in his thinking it will be good for his community as a whole so that others could think that racism or anti-Semitism will be good for their community as a whole also, for it is a powerful influence for a psychiatrist to post the swastika and refuse to delete it which could lead a subset of vulnerable readers to think that he is endorsing the swastika as to what it stands for.
> > Here in [admin, 428781 ] we can see the start of him changing his rules to allow anti-Semitic hate to be seen without his tagline to be civil. But worse, his rules to me prevent me from posting my own repudiation to the anti-Semitic hate being allowed to be posted without his tagline to be civil. In fact, even more prohibitions were posted to me by Mr. Hsiung that prevents me from exposing the relationship between psychiatry and mass-murder. Please take a look at [ admin, 428781 ], for this is where darkness started to come over this forum to shut off the light.
> > Lou
>
> Lamdage22,
> The darkness of hate can be facilitated in many ways, one being discrimination by the administration of a group that could induce what psychologists call a collective psychopathy which is how anti-Semitism is created and developed by the leaders of a group.
> The discrimination here involves what is known as two standards, one for the group and one for the Jewish member, myself. The standard is that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record will respond according to his TOS to members sending a notification that a post could be against the rules, but could not respond to mine so that others will also not respond to me. Not only, does that allow anti-Semitic propaganda to stand, but it stigmatizes me as being inferior to the non-Jews here in that I can be discriminated upon with impunity by the deputies of record and Mr. Hsiung by the unequal application of his rules which deny me equal protection from the harm of discrimination and defamation and anti-Semitism. And worse, readers could act out in real world communities violence toward Jews and others also to lead a subset of psychopaths to commit mass-murder, for anti-Semitism is a form of racism that could be transferred to racist ideology to have not only Jews to be targets of hate, but other minorities as well. This could include those of non-white races, those with un popular sexual orientations, and anyone else that the hatred toward the Jews as being allowed to be seen as supportive here could be transferred to.
> Psychologists write about that hate could also be transferred to themselves and cause suicide to those that are led to believe that Jews are inferior people, or anyone else is an inferior human being. And when mind-altering drugs are put into the person that sees anti-Semitism as being supportive here, the acting out of mass-murder gets a great boost from thinking that anti-Semitism will be good for any community as a whole. Many leaders have said that in the past and they were killed by their own populace when they saw through the deceit of hate, or they killed themselves or were executed as war criminals. When will they ever learn.
> Lou
> here is a post showing the discrimination against me that stigmatizes me as inferior as my notifications for years remain outstanding which allows the anti-Semitism to stand. For if they were acted on, then I could have the hate stopped here. By the deputies of record and Mr. Hsiung being indifferent to my pleas to stop the hate, anti-Semitism could be created and developed here with impunity, for even if another member notified the same post, in order for them to perpetuate the indifference, they could also not act on their notification to keep mine un acted on. This is nothing new, but an old way that perverts the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States and other countries where Jefferson wrote, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. And later in the Constitution the equal protection of the laws as to the 14th amendment.
> Let us look at this post:
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1054184.htmlLamdage22,
Now let us look at this post:
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1066863.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 20, 2015, at 8:22:15
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on June 11, 2015, at 21:16:29
> Lou good thread by you. It speaks of hope and light. Possibly many do not need meds but then also possible that many do. Is this about psychiatric meds only or all meds? As for all meds to be included would also exclude vaccinations of children and adults.
Phillipa,
I will be showing readers here the hope that could bring one out of the darkness of depression , addiction and death into the marvelous light of life, free from the slavery of drugs. This could lead readers to think that they have become victims of deceit, lies and false advertising.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 22, 2015, at 11:47:46
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-The Rider » Tomatheus, posted by Lou Pilder on June 17, 2015, at 16:45:40
> > > I have come here to lead you to the light of life that could forever expose the lies from the Prince of Death where all lies originate. And in that encounter with the Rider on a white horse, I asked about the light of life and He said to me, "It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh profits nothing; the words that I speak to you, they are spirit and they are life."
> >
> > Lou,
> >
> > It sounds like the Rider on a white horse is familiar with the book of John from the Christian New Testament -- specifically John 6:63.
> >
> > http://biblehub.com/john/6-63.htm
> >
> > Tomatheus
>
> Tomatheus,
> You wrote,[...the Rider on the white horse is familiar...].
> Many of you already know that I have written here that the Rider on the white horse is not Christiandom's Jesus. I am prevented by Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions to me to explain that fully here, for Tomatheus is aware that what the Rider said is contained in the Christian Bible.
> But it has been revealed to me that the Rider was there in the beginning, with Adam and Eve, with the serpent, with God, with the Tree of Life.
> You could do a search and see some of my posts concerning this, like a search,[Lou, Adam, eve, tree of life, rider, garden, in the midst], which could bring up many of those posts which I think could help to see s little more about this here.
> You see, the Rider is the Word of God, so that when God said, "Let there be light", it was the Rider that was the light and the life.
> Lou
>
Tomatheus and Friends,
The Rider that I have been writing about here is not Christiandom's Jesus. Many of you recognize many statements by the Rider as also like those in the Christiandom Bible. That may be, but Christiandom's Jesus is different from the Rider on the white horse that I am writing about. You could know the reason why.
Lou
Here is a passage from a Christiandom sect that includes the statement in their scriptures. This may help you to understand that the Rider that I have been writing about is not Christiandom's Jesus. To see this go to the search box at the bottom of this page and type in:
[ admin, 428781 ]
Look for the 428781 in the colored strip URL, not in the subject line.
Posted by Kirkglen on June 23, 2015, at 10:29:06
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-Christiandom's Jesus, posted by Lou Pilder on June 22, 2015, at 11:47:46
Lou I believe if you're doing well with the statements you make I think that is great. I pray everyday and thank my God someone has chosen a life of researching mental illness trying to help.
Is it perfect? No but I know many individuals that respond well to their meds and live a good life. The reason I visit this post is for knowledge. I've learned so much from reading others problems and failures/successes using medicines.Who knows? Maybe the cure will be found here. The more heads you utilize the more knowledge exists.
I'll continue my prays and utilize my medicine as I know what will result if I trash it.
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 23, 2015, at 17:38:29
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-Christiandom's Jesus, posted by Kirkglen on June 23, 2015, at 10:29:06
> Lou I believe if you're doing well with the statements you make I think that is great. I pray everyday and thank my God someone has chosen a life of researching mental illness trying to help.
>
>
> Is it perfect? No but I know many individuals that respond well to their meds and live a good life. The reason I visit this post is for knowledge. I've learned so much from reading others problems and failures/successes using medicines.
>
> Who knows? Maybe the cure will be found here. The more heads you utilize the more knowledge exists.
>
> I'll continue my prays and utilize my medicine as I know what will result if I trash it.Kirkglen,
You wrote,[...The more heads you utilize the more knowledge exists...].
The tragedy here is that the knowledge that I could post here is prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to me. It would come from a Jewish perspective that he prohibits me to post here. And worse, he allows antisemitic propaganda to be seen here as supportive and also statements that could decrease the respect and confidence and regard in which I am held that could induce hostile and disagreeable opinions and feeling toward me here. That could steer readers to a particular Road and cause readers to miss out on the Road that I could lead them to that I think could save lives and could lead to life and freedom from addiction and depression. And worse, this is all orchestrated by a psychiatrist that says that readers are to trust him in that what he does will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole. That is a powerful influence to readers here taking mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist/doctor. For it stigmatizes me and insults Judaism, The statement from Mr. Hsiung, [...please try and trust me...] is not new, but an old tactic that history has shown to have brought death and destruction to those that followed the leader that played that card. The trust card is also in the same hand as the Golden Rule card. As Mr. Hsiung leads readers to believe that he is following the golden Rule. But the fact is that anti-Semitic hate, including that Mr. Hsiung has posted the swastika here, is allowed to be seen as supportive because when it is seen that way, Mr. Hsiung says that he allows it because it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole. Many before him used that tactic to justify infanticide, segregation, slavery, genocide and discrimination. Time was the judge for those in the past and time will be the judge here as to if Mr. Hsiung's vision of a {gooder} community is to result by allowing anti-Semitic hate to be seen as supportive here. I have been revealed otherwise and see that when hate is seen as being validated by a psychiatrist, those that trust him could have that hate turned inward and kill themselves or others, even commit mass-murder.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 23, 2015, at 18:16:14
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe- » Kirkglen, posted by Lou Pilder on June 23, 2015, at 17:38:29
> > Lou I believe if you're doing well with the statements you make I think that is great. I pray everyday and thank my God someone has chosen a life of researching mental illness trying to help.
> >
> >
> > Is it perfect? No but I know many individuals that respond well to their meds and live a good life. The reason I visit this post is for knowledge. I've learned so much from reading others problems and failures/successes using medicines.
> >
> > Who knows? Maybe the cure will be found here. The more heads you utilize the more knowledge exists.
> >
> > I'll continue my prays and utilize my medicine as I know what will result if I trash it.
>
> Kirkglen,
> You wrote,[...The more heads you utilize the more knowledge exists...].
> The tragedy here is that the knowledge that I could post here is prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to me. It would come from a Jewish perspective that he prohibits me to post here. And worse, he allows antisemitic propaganda to be seen here as supportive and also statements that could decrease the respect and confidence and regard in which I am held that could induce hostile and disagreeable opinions and feeling toward me here. That could steer readers to a particular Road and cause readers to miss out on the Road that I could lead them to that I think could save lives and could lead to life and freedom from addiction and depression. And worse, this is all orchestrated by a psychiatrist that says that readers are to trust him in that what he does will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole. That is a powerful influence to readers here taking mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist/doctor. For it stigmatizes me and insults Judaism, The statement from Mr. Hsiung, [...please try and trust me...] is not new, but an old tactic that history has shown to have brought death and destruction to those that followed the leader that played that card. The trust card is also in the same hand as the Golden Rule card. As Mr. Hsiung leads readers to believe that he is following the golden Rule. But the fact is that anti-Semitic hate, including that Mr. Hsiung has posted the swastika here, is allowed to be seen as supportive because when it is seen that way, Mr. Hsiung says that he allows it because it will in his thinking be good for his community as a whole. Many before him used that tactic to justify infanticide, segregation, slavery, genocide and discrimination. Time was the judge for those in the past and time will be the judge here as to if Mr. Hsiung's vision of a {gooder} community is to result by allowing anti-Semitic hate to be seen as supportive here. I have been revealed otherwise and see that when hate is seen as being validated by a psychiatrist, those that trust him could have that hate turned inward and kill themselves or others, even commit mass-murder.
> LouKirkland,
You wrote,[...I will continue my pray(ers)and utilize my medicine as I know what will result if I trash it...].
What I could write here if the prohibitions were not made to me here by Mr. Hsiung, could help those to withdrawal from mind-altering drugs and be able to be unshackled from addiction and depression. If a person has diabetes from the drugs, they will still have diabetes. If a person has depression and manicness, they will still have it, but there will be a difference that will enable them to be free from the drugs and their potential to cause a life-ruining condition or addiction or death. What I could post could lead them to a new life. This new life will still have whatever was in the old life such as OCD, depression and any permanent damage to them caused by the drugs. But they will not be enslaved by the drugs, for they will not be taking them at all. But I could show those how they could {overcome} without the drugs and escape the ravages that the drugs could bring to them, even killing themselves. In other words, they would be traveling a new Road. The road would be very narrow and they would have to live a very different life with many restrictions and having to avoid a multitude of situations to prevent depression, mania OCD and the rest from overcoming them. In short, you could have to start a whole new life because what was in your old life could be the cause of your depression, mania, OCD and such. But this new life has a Shepard to have them follow so that they do not go astray. The Great Shepard will lead them to life, and life more abundantly, gone will be the old life, never to come again.
Lou
Posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 0:37:20
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-GrShp, posted by Lou Pilder on June 23, 2015, at 18:16:14
Lou,
Why don't you post whatever you are compelled to, no matter the consequences, and have it off your conscience? Surely any action from a psych forum would have no impact on your message.
Please, share.
ClearSkies
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 24, 2015, at 7:41:59
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-GrShp, posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 0:37:20
> Lou,
>
> Why don't you post whatever you are compelled to, no matter the consequences, and have it off your conscience? Surely any action from a psych forum would have no impact on your message.
>
> Please, share.
>
> ClearSkiesClearSkies,
You wrote,[...Surely any action from a psych forum would have no consequences on your message...]
It is much more than that. For Mr. Hsiung has posted that displays the swastika and worse, he will not remove it. Nor will he post a disclaimer to the post where the swastika posted by him is originally posted. This speaks volumes and I have a great fear that if I post the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me against his prohibition to me here, there could be consequences to other Jews besides myself. I base this on the histotical record where those leaders that allowed anti-Semitic propaganda to be promulgated with impunity and the leaders displayed the swastika, used pathological retaliatory tactics against other Jews when one Jew broke the prohibition by the leader that Jews could not practice or, as in here, post about the foundation of Judaism as revealed to them even though the foundation of hatred toward the Jews is welcomed to post with impunity here by Mr. Hsiung with him even thanking the poster for posting anti-Semitic propaganda saying that he thinks that it is good, and up to 6 deputies of record and those in concert with them. And all that he does here is based in his thinking that by doing whatever it is here, it will be good for his community as a whole. And worse, he asks readers to trust him at that.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075058.html
Posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 13:39:28
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-retalfear » ClearSkies, posted by Lou Pilder on June 24, 2015, at 7:41:59
Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
Sorry, I have no other advice.
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 24, 2015, at 17:56:42
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-retalfear, posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 13:39:28
> Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
>
> Sorry, I have no other advice.ClearSkies,
As to his involvement, his TOS says that if he is off-line, someone else does his wishes, which are the deputies of record. Without any explanation from him as to why he is not fulfilling his own TOS, there could be many reasons for that which unless specified by him, readers could think that there is a deliberate indifference by him and his deputy, or some un preventable circumstance that prohibits him from doing what is required to fulfill his TOS. As to if his absence is deliberate or not, the harm that could come to Jews from seeing anti-Semitic propaganda being allowed to be seen as supportive here, can still have the potential to cause deaths. For if one match could start a forest fire, a perpetual flame could cause an inferno.
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on June 24, 2015, at 18:40:33
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-retalfear, posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 13:39:28
Me neither he's done up and left. Wonder if paid his rent? P
Posted by SLS on June 24, 2015, at 19:11:49
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-retalfear, posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 13:39:28
> Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
I guess he could.
I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 25, 2015, at 9:15:45
In reply to Administrative issue. » ClearSkies, posted by SLS on June 24, 2015, at 19:11:49
> > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
>
> I guess he could.
>
> I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
>
> To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
>
> This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
>
> That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 26, 2015, at 6:52:29
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-response to Scott- » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on June 25, 2015, at 9:15:45
> > > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
> >
> > I guess he could.
> >
> > I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
> >
> > To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
> >
> > This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
> >
> > That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott,
> You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
> As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
> Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
> The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
> LouFriends,
Who has believed my report? And to whom has it been given here to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity? And how many posts will it take for readers to see what is plainly visible?
The hatred toward Jews lives here to be seen as supportive and worse, that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen that way. This is not new but an old tactic from the middle ages carries by the flames of hate to this day burning here producing the flames of hate perpetually that could foster hatred all over the world to hate groups seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him and ratified by the silence of up to 6 deputies all recruited to implement the wishes of Mr. Hsiung.
One of the most insidious tactics to spread hatred toward the Jews is to use a Jdew or Jews as scapegoats for one's blaming a Jew or Jews for the real or imagined ills of a state, country, business, club, community, workplace ect.
Here we have myself, the Jewish member trying to purge out from here the old hatreds toward the Jews allowed to be promoted by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those in concert with them by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowing anti-Semitic propaganda and scapegoating a Jew, myself here, by refusing to act on my notifications that allow hatred and scapegoating to be seen as supportive.
Let us examine what is in the following post from here and the offered links within the post. When scapegoating is allowed to be promoted as that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole, a psychiatrist's thinking can be a powerful ally to terrorists to seek out others as scapegoats and commit mass-murder, even blaming their victims for bringing disease to their community. This ancient tactic, called {poisoning the well} has been used against Jews for centuries. And those of you that want to put your trust in Mr. Hsiung as he asks for you to do in that whatever he allows here to be seen as supportive will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole, I ask you that pretend that you just don't see, and those that here that can see what is plainly visible here, that as long as you allow the swastika to be posted here by Mr. Hsiung, and scapegoating to be allowed to be justified by Mr. Hsiung, and members allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here, this site will continue to produce the flames of hate. And those flames could consume you. Let us examine this post closely by Scott. Also notice Mr. Hsiung's rational for allowing Scott's statement about me by reading the thread.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075146.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 27, 2015, at 8:57:06
In reply to Lou's Little Shoppe-scpgoatJews, posted by Lou Pilder on June 26, 2015, at 6:52:29
> > > > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
> > >
> > > I guess he could.
> > >
> > > I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
> > >
> > > To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
> > >
> > > This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
> > >
> > > That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> >
> > Scott,
> > You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
> > As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
> > Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
> > The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
> > Lou
>
> Friends,
> Who has believed my report? And to whom has it been given here to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity? And how many posts will it take for readers to see what is plainly visible?
> The hatred toward Jews lives here to be seen as supportive and worse, that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen that way. This is not new but an old tactic from the middle ages carries by the flames of hate to this day burning here producing the flames of hate perpetually that could foster hatred all over the world to hate groups seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him and ratified by the silence of up to 6 deputies all recruited to implement the wishes of Mr. Hsiung.
> One of the most insidious tactics to spread hatred toward the Jews is to use a Jdew or Jews as scapegoats for one's blaming a Jew or Jews for the real or imagined ills of a state, country, business, club, community, workplace ect.
> Here we have myself, the Jewish member trying to purge out from here the old hatreds toward the Jews allowed to be promoted by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those in concert with them by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowing anti-Semitic propaganda and scapegoating a Jew, myself here, by refusing to act on my notifications that allow hatred and scapegoating to be seen as supportive.
> Let us examine what is in the following post from here and the offered links within the post. When scapegoating is allowed to be promoted as that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole, a psychiatrist's thinking can be a powerful ally to terrorists to seek out others as scapegoats and commit mass-murder, even blaming their victims for bringing disease to their community. This ancient tactic, called {poisoning the well} has been used against Jews for centuries. And those of you that want to put your trust in Mr. Hsiung as he asks for you to do in that whatever he allows here to be seen as supportive will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole, I ask you that pretend that you just don't see, and those that here that can see what is plainly visible here, that as long as you allow the swastika to be posted here by Mr. Hsiung, and scapegoating to be allowed to be justified by Mr. Hsiung, and members allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here, this site will continue to produce the flames of hate. And those flames could consume you. Let us examine this post closely by Scott. Also notice Mr. Hsiung's rational for allowing Scott's statement about me by reading the thread.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075146.htmlFriends,
Be not deceived. The use of deceit and lies do not annul the fact of what is plainly visible here in that Mr. Hsiung is allowing Scott and others to defame Judaism and insult the faith of Jews and me as a Jew here by using ancient tactics of Jew-haters that stoke the furnace of hatred against the Jews to come from here to go all over the world in the homes of those with internet access and those that hold the internet in their hands.
One of the ancient tactics of Jew-haters is to claim that Jews are not saved and worse, they have to convert to Christianity to be saved. That tactic promulgated during the dark ages and carried by the flame of hate here, fostered by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is anti-Semitic on its face for it is against the Jew, claiming that Judaism can not lead Jews to salvation, assigning the Jews to everlasting torment in hell according to the anti-Semitic agendas of many mainstream Christian sects throughout history. Jews were subjected to torture or burning at the stake if they did not convert to Christiandom by those sects. Yet today, this site upholds the ancient backward hate promulgated here by Scott here and can be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and any deputy of record as Scott's post insulting to the Jews is allowed to be a perpetual flame of hate here until Mr. Hsiung posts his tag line to please be civil to the post by Scott where it is originally posted. His statement is insulting to Jews and leads a Jew to feel put down/accused all against the rules here and if nothing is done to the statement, then readers can think that it is not against the rules here, and worse, that it will be good on Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen as conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of the community.
That is Mr. Hsiung's vision of his future community as being good for the whole. And if you are so easily persuaded by Mr. Hsiung to put your trust in him as he asks of you, remember who else said the same thing in his vision of his country about the Jews.
And notice that Mr. Hsiung uses a lie to attempt to substantiate Scott's defamation of the Jews and me here as being supportive. Let us look at Scott's post where he says that I have to give up Judaism by converting to Christianity to be saved, which could mean that he thinks that all Jews are not saved unless they convert to Christianity. And look at Mr. Hsiung's attempt to allow the statement as civil by the tactic of evasion by putting up a false statement that readers could think is true because he says to trust him. His statement is false that says that [...Christians convert to Judaism as much as...], so why would you want to trust him? This is how anti-Semitism is created and developed. It is done by deceit and lies and the Great Deception which Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions to me here prevent me from posting here. By allowing Scott's post against the Jews and me as a Jew here, readers could think that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the claim by Scott that is against the Jew, leading readers to think that Jews are inferior to Christians because they are not saved, which could dehumanize and stigmatize Jews from people reading here and could lead those that understand how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community, to conclude that this is an anti-Semitic site. That is how the flames of hatred toward the Jews are spread, from sites like this where a psychiatrist leads readers to think that anti-Semitism is supportive and in his thinking for it being allowed to be seen that way, it will be good for his community as a whole. History shows otherwise.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1055904.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 27, 2015, at 9:31:15
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-retalfear, posted by ClearSkies on June 24, 2015, at 13:39:28
> Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
>
> Sorry, I have no other advice.ClearSkies;
I have emailed with ADL. Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions prevent me from posting here that conversation between me and their representative.
But be advised that Mr. Hsiung can at this time until the U.S. high court rules in a parallel case, allow third -party posters to defame me and others and post anti-Semitic content. But the high court at one time upheld slavery and segregation. And there were people that took advantage of those laws and owned slaves. But there were also people that did not take advantage of that law and fought against hatred and injustice. Which group do you want to be in?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 28, 2015, at 5:27:11
In reply to Lou's Little Shopp-create and develop antisemitism, posted by Lou Pilder on June 27, 2015, at 8:57:06
> > > > > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
> > > >
> > > > I guess he could.
> > > >
> > > > I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
> > > >
> > > > To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
> > > >
> > > > This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
> > > >
> > > > That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Scott
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > > You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
> > > As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
> > > Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
> > > The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
> > > Lou
> >
> > Friends,
> > Who has believed my report? And to whom has it been given here to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity? And how many posts will it take for readers to see what is plainly visible?
> > The hatred toward Jews lives here to be seen as supportive and worse, that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen that way. This is not new but an old tactic from the middle ages carries by the flames of hate to this day burning here producing the flames of hate perpetually that could foster hatred all over the world to hate groups seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him and ratified by the silence of up to 6 deputies all recruited to implement the wishes of Mr. Hsiung.
> > One of the most insidious tactics to spread hatred toward the Jews is to use a Jdew or Jews as scapegoats for one's blaming a Jew or Jews for the real or imagined ills of a state, country, business, club, community, workplace ect.
> > Here we have myself, the Jewish member trying to purge out from here the old hatreds toward the Jews allowed to be promoted by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those in concert with them by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowing anti-Semitic propaganda and scapegoating a Jew, myself here, by refusing to act on my notifications that allow hatred and scapegoating to be seen as supportive.
> > Let us examine what is in the following post from here and the offered links within the post. When scapegoating is allowed to be promoted as that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole, a psychiatrist's thinking can be a powerful ally to terrorists to seek out others as scapegoats and commit mass-murder, even blaming their victims for bringing disease to their community. This ancient tactic, called {poisoning the well} has been used against Jews for centuries. And those of you that want to put your trust in Mr. Hsiung as he asks for you to do in that whatever he allows here to be seen as supportive will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole, I ask you that pretend that you just don't see, and those that here that can see what is plainly visible here, that as long as you allow the swastika to be posted here by Mr. Hsiung, and scapegoating to be allowed to be justified by Mr. Hsiung, and members allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here, this site will continue to produce the flames of hate. And those flames could consume you. Let us examine this post closely by Scott. Also notice Mr. Hsiung's rational for allowing Scott's statement about me by reading the thread.
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075146.html
>
> Friends,
> Be not deceived. The use of deceit and lies do not annul the fact of what is plainly visible here in that Mr. Hsiung is allowing Scott and others to defame Judaism and insult the faith of Jews and me as a Jew here by using ancient tactics of Jew-haters that stoke the furnace of hatred against the Jews to come from here to go all over the world in the homes of those with internet access and those that hold the internet in their hands.
> One of the ancient tactics of Jew-haters is to claim that Jews are not saved and worse, they have to convert to Christianity to be saved. That tactic promulgated during the dark ages and carried by the flame of hate here, fostered by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is anti-Semitic on its face for it is against the Jew, claiming that Judaism can not lead Jews to salvation, assigning the Jews to everlasting torment in hell according to the anti-Semitic agendas of many mainstream Christian sects throughout history. Jews were subjected to torture or burning at the stake if they did not convert to Christiandom by those sects. Yet today, this site upholds the ancient backward hate promulgated here by Scott here and can be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and any deputy of record as Scott's post insulting to the Jews is allowed to be a perpetual flame of hate here until Mr. Hsiung posts his tag line to please be civil to the post by Scott where it is originally posted. His statement is insulting to Jews and leads a Jew to feel put down/accused all against the rules here and if nothing is done to the statement, then readers can think that it is not against the rules here, and worse, that it will be good on Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen as conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of the community.
> That is Mr. Hsiung's vision of his future community as being good for the whole. And if you are so easily persuaded by Mr. Hsiung to put your trust in him as he asks of you, remember who else said the same thing in his vision of his country about the Jews.
> And notice that Mr. Hsiung uses a lie to attempt to substantiate Scott's defamation of the Jews and me here as being supportive. Let us look at Scott's post where he says that I have to give up Judaism by converting to Christianity to be saved, which could mean that he thinks that all Jews are not saved unless they convert to Christianity. And look at Mr. Hsiung's attempt to allow the statement as civil by the tactic of evasion by putting up a false statement that readers could think is true because he says to trust him. His statement is false that says that [...Christians convert to Judaism as much as...], so why would you want to trust him? This is how anti-Semitism is created and developed. It is done by deceit and lies and the Great Deception which Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions to me here prevent me from posting here. By allowing Scott's post against the Jews and me as a Jew here, readers could think that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the claim by Scott that is against the Jew, leading readers to think that Jews are inferior to Christians because they are not saved, which could dehumanize and stigmatize Jews from people reading here and could lead those that understand how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community, to conclude that this is an anti-Semitic site. That is how the flames of hatred toward the Jews are spread, from sites like this where a psychiatrist leads readers to think that anti-Semitism is supportive and in his thinking for it being allowed to be seen that way, it will be good for his community as a whole. History shows otherwise.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1055904.htmlFriends,
Be not deceived. For Scott says that Mr. Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism or committed an anti-Semitic act. But what constitutes committing an anti-Semitic act here or what constitutes advocating anti-Semitism?
Anti-Semitism means {against the Jew} as one method to determine if what is in question constitutes an anti-Semitic act of fosters anti-Semitism. If readers here are led by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record that are recruited by Mr. Hsiung to carry out his wishes, to manipulate the content here so that the site here is against the Jew, then that fits what Scott says he does not see. The content can be controlled by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies by allowing hatred toward me to be allowed to be seen as supportive, for Mr. Hsiung states that being supportive takes precedence and worse, that if something is allowed to stand, he allows it {so that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's vision for this community as a whole}. This means that readers could conclude that whatever is standing un repudiated by Mr. Hsiung or his deputies or record, that even anti-Semitic propaganda or hatred toward me standing will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole for it to be seen that way. In the following, defamation toward me is allowed to stand where it is originally posted and Mr. Hsiung refuses to post his tag line to be civil to the post. but it is much more than that. For the slander is against me, the Jewish member, and what is said about my character could apply to all Jews, which could encourage other posters to think of Jews as being the character of what is allowed to stand here about me. This is one way anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community to arouse ill-will toward a Jewish member, denying the Jew equal protection of the rules, defaming Judaism itself. The allowing of the defamation toward me by the poster with impunity creates a mind-set to readers that Jews are inferior members here that are allowed to be mocked and taunted and ridiculed, all against all known psychiatric priniciples that say that putting down or accusing someone is not conducive to sound mental-health. And for readers to see that I am allowed to be ridiculed and mocked and taunted with impunity here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, they could think that anti-Semitism is supportive and will be good for them, for in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, he does what will be good for the community as a whole. I say that those that are understanding of European Fascism, already know what the consequences that occurred to Jews when the leader allowed hatred toward the Jews to be allowed with impunity which made them think that the state was encouraging anti-Semitic hate. This is known as state-sponsored anti-Semitism.
Scott say that he does not se it. Do you?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130702/msgs/1048569.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 28, 2015, at 6:15:34
In reply to Lou's Little Shopp-create and develop antisemitism, posted by Lou Pilder on June 28, 2015, at 5:27:11
> > > > > > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess he could.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
> > > > >
> > > > > To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
> > > > >
> > > > > This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott,
> > > > You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
> > > > As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
> > > > Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
> > > > The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
> > > > Lou
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > Who has believed my report? And to whom has it been given here to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity? And how many posts will it take for readers to see what is plainly visible?
> > > The hatred toward Jews lives here to be seen as supportive and worse, that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen that way. This is not new but an old tactic from the middle ages carries by the flames of hate to this day burning here producing the flames of hate perpetually that could foster hatred all over the world to hate groups seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him and ratified by the silence of up to 6 deputies all recruited to implement the wishes of Mr. Hsiung.
> > > One of the most insidious tactics to spread hatred toward the Jews is to use a Jdew or Jews as scapegoats for one's blaming a Jew or Jews for the real or imagined ills of a state, country, business, club, community, workplace ect.
> > > Here we have myself, the Jewish member trying to purge out from here the old hatreds toward the Jews allowed to be promoted by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those in concert with them by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowing anti-Semitic propaganda and scapegoating a Jew, myself here, by refusing to act on my notifications that allow hatred and scapegoating to be seen as supportive.
> > > Let us examine what is in the following post from here and the offered links within the post. When scapegoating is allowed to be promoted as that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole, a psychiatrist's thinking can be a powerful ally to terrorists to seek out others as scapegoats and commit mass-murder, even blaming their victims for bringing disease to their community. This ancient tactic, called {poisoning the well} has been used against Jews for centuries. And those of you that want to put your trust in Mr. Hsiung as he asks for you to do in that whatever he allows here to be seen as supportive will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole, I ask you that pretend that you just don't see, and those that here that can see what is plainly visible here, that as long as you allow the swastika to be posted here by Mr. Hsiung, and scapegoating to be allowed to be justified by Mr. Hsiung, and members allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here, this site will continue to produce the flames of hate. And those flames could consume you. Let us examine this post closely by Scott. Also notice Mr. Hsiung's rational for allowing Scott's statement about me by reading the thread.
> > > Lou
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075146.html
> >
> > Friends,
> > Be not deceived. The use of deceit and lies do not annul the fact of what is plainly visible here in that Mr. Hsiung is allowing Scott and others to defame Judaism and insult the faith of Jews and me as a Jew here by using ancient tactics of Jew-haters that stoke the furnace of hatred against the Jews to come from here to go all over the world in the homes of those with internet access and those that hold the internet in their hands.
> > One of the ancient tactics of Jew-haters is to claim that Jews are not saved and worse, they have to convert to Christianity to be saved. That tactic promulgated during the dark ages and carried by the flame of hate here, fostered by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is anti-Semitic on its face for it is against the Jew, claiming that Judaism can not lead Jews to salvation, assigning the Jews to everlasting torment in hell according to the anti-Semitic agendas of many mainstream Christian sects throughout history. Jews were subjected to torture or burning at the stake if they did not convert to Christiandom by those sects. Yet today, this site upholds the ancient backward hate promulgated here by Scott here and can be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and any deputy of record as Scott's post insulting to the Jews is allowed to be a perpetual flame of hate here until Mr. Hsiung posts his tag line to please be civil to the post by Scott where it is originally posted. His statement is insulting to Jews and leads a Jew to feel put down/accused all against the rules here and if nothing is done to the statement, then readers can think that it is not against the rules here, and worse, that it will be good on Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen as conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of the community.
> > That is Mr. Hsiung's vision of his future community as being good for the whole. And if you are so easily persuaded by Mr. Hsiung to put your trust in him as he asks of you, remember who else said the same thing in his vision of his country about the Jews.
> > And notice that Mr. Hsiung uses a lie to attempt to substantiate Scott's defamation of the Jews and me here as being supportive. Let us look at Scott's post where he says that I have to give up Judaism by converting to Christianity to be saved, which could mean that he thinks that all Jews are not saved unless they convert to Christianity. And look at Mr. Hsiung's attempt to allow the statement as civil by the tactic of evasion by putting up a false statement that readers could think is true because he says to trust him. His statement is false that says that [...Christians convert to Judaism as much as...], so why would you want to trust him? This is how anti-Semitism is created and developed. It is done by deceit and lies and the Great Deception which Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions to me here prevent me from posting here. By allowing Scott's post against the Jews and me as a Jew here, readers could think that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the claim by Scott that is against the Jew, leading readers to think that Jews are inferior to Christians because they are not saved, which could dehumanize and stigmatize Jews from people reading here and could lead those that understand how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community, to conclude that this is an anti-Semitic site. That is how the flames of hatred toward the Jews are spread, from sites like this where a psychiatrist leads readers to think that anti-Semitism is supportive and in his thinking for it being allowed to be seen that way, it will be good for his community as a whole. History shows otherwise.
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1055904.html
>
> Friends,
> Be not deceived. For Scott says that Mr. Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism or committed an anti-Semitic act. But what constitutes committing an anti-Semitic act here or what constitutes advocating anti-Semitism?
> Anti-Semitism means {against the Jew} as one method to determine if what is in question constitutes an anti-Semitic act of fosters anti-Semitism. If readers here are led by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record that are recruited by Mr. Hsiung to carry out his wishes, to manipulate the content here so that the site here is against the Jew, then that fits what Scott says he does not see. The content can be controlled by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies by allowing hatred toward me to be allowed to be seen as supportive, for Mr. Hsiung states that being supportive takes precedence and worse, that if something is allowed to stand, he allows it {so that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's vision for this community as a whole}. This means that readers could conclude that whatever is standing un repudiated by Mr. Hsiung or his deputies or record, that even anti-Semitic propaganda or hatred toward me standing will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole for it to be seen that way. In the following, defamation toward me is allowed to stand where it is originally posted and Mr. Hsiung refuses to post his tag line to be civil to the post. but it is much more than that. For the slander is against me, the Jewish member, and what is said about my character could apply to all Jews, which could encourage other posters to think of Jews as being the character of what is allowed to stand here about me. This is one way anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community to arouse ill-will toward a Jewish member, denying the Jew equal protection of the rules, defaming Judaism itself. The allowing of the defamation toward me by the poster with impunity creates a mind-set to readers that Jews are inferior members here that are allowed to be mocked and taunted and ridiculed, all against all known psychiatric priniciples that say that putting down or accusing someone is not conducive to sound mental-health. And for readers to see that I am allowed to be ridiculed and mocked and taunted with impunity here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, they could think that anti-Semitism is supportive and will be good for them, for in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, he does what will be good for the community as a whole. I say that those that are understanding of European Fascism, already know what the consequences that occurred to Jews when the leader allowed hatred toward the Jews to be allowed with impunity which made them think that the state was encouraging anti-Semitic hate. This is known as state-sponsored anti-Semitism.
> Scott say that he does not se it. Do you?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130702/msgs/1048569.htmlFriends,
To create and develop anti-Semitic hate can be done in a community in more than just allowing what is against the Jew to stand as being supportive here. Here is a partial list of other tactics used in the historical record that tyrants bent on defaming the Jews have used to foster anti-Semitic hate that would be good in their vision for their community as a whole. Scott says that he can not see these. Can you?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/844279.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2015, at 6:44:48
In reply to Re: Lou's Little Shoppe-Christiandom's Jesus, posted by Kirkglen on June 23, 2015, at 10:29:06
> Lou I believe if you're doing well with the statements you make I think that is great. I pray everyday and thank my God someone has chosen a life of researching mental illness trying to help.
>
>
> Is it perfect? No but I know many individuals that respond well to their meds and live a good life. The reason I visit this post is for knowledge. I've learned so much from reading others problems and failures/successes using medicines.
>
> Who knows? Maybe the cure will be found here. The more heads you utilize the more knowledge exists.
>
> I'll continue my prays and utilize my medicine as I know what will result if I trash it.Kirkglen;
You wrote,[...Lou, I believe that you are doing well...I think that is great...].
The topic here is how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community and that some readers claim that they just don't see. If you could email me by first using the b-mail to get my email, then I could inform you of what can not be posted here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2015, at 7:09:59
In reply to Lou's Little Shopp-create and develop antisemitism, posted by Lou Pilder on June 28, 2015, at 6:15:34
> > > > > > > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess he could.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Scott
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott,
> > > > > You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
> > > > > As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
> > > > > Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
> > > > > The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
> > > > > Lou
> > > >
> > > > Friends,
> > > > Who has believed my report? And to whom has it been given here to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity? And how many posts will it take for readers to see what is plainly visible?
> > > > The hatred toward Jews lives here to be seen as supportive and worse, that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen that way. This is not new but an old tactic from the middle ages carries by the flames of hate to this day burning here producing the flames of hate perpetually that could foster hatred all over the world to hate groups seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him and ratified by the silence of up to 6 deputies all recruited to implement the wishes of Mr. Hsiung.
> > > > One of the most insidious tactics to spread hatred toward the Jews is to use a Jdew or Jews as scapegoats for one's blaming a Jew or Jews for the real or imagined ills of a state, country, business, club, community, workplace ect.
> > > > Here we have myself, the Jewish member trying to purge out from here the old hatreds toward the Jews allowed to be promoted by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those in concert with them by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowing anti-Semitic propaganda and scapegoating a Jew, myself here, by refusing to act on my notifications that allow hatred and scapegoating to be seen as supportive.
> > > > Let us examine what is in the following post from here and the offered links within the post. When scapegoating is allowed to be promoted as that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole, a psychiatrist's thinking can be a powerful ally to terrorists to seek out others as scapegoats and commit mass-murder, even blaming their victims for bringing disease to their community. This ancient tactic, called {poisoning the well} has been used against Jews for centuries. And those of you that want to put your trust in Mr. Hsiung as he asks for you to do in that whatever he allows here to be seen as supportive will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole, I ask you that pretend that you just don't see, and those that here that can see what is plainly visible here, that as long as you allow the swastika to be posted here by Mr. Hsiung, and scapegoating to be allowed to be justified by Mr. Hsiung, and members allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here, this site will continue to produce the flames of hate. And those flames could consume you. Let us examine this post closely by Scott. Also notice Mr. Hsiung's rational for allowing Scott's statement about me by reading the thread.
> > > > Lou
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075146.html
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > Be not deceived. The use of deceit and lies do not annul the fact of what is plainly visible here in that Mr. Hsiung is allowing Scott and others to defame Judaism and insult the faith of Jews and me as a Jew here by using ancient tactics of Jew-haters that stoke the furnace of hatred against the Jews to come from here to go all over the world in the homes of those with internet access and those that hold the internet in their hands.
> > > One of the ancient tactics of Jew-haters is to claim that Jews are not saved and worse, they have to convert to Christianity to be saved. That tactic promulgated during the dark ages and carried by the flame of hate here, fostered by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is anti-Semitic on its face for it is against the Jew, claiming that Judaism can not lead Jews to salvation, assigning the Jews to everlasting torment in hell according to the anti-Semitic agendas of many mainstream Christian sects throughout history. Jews were subjected to torture or burning at the stake if they did not convert to Christiandom by those sects. Yet today, this site upholds the ancient backward hate promulgated here by Scott here and can be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and any deputy of record as Scott's post insulting to the Jews is allowed to be a perpetual flame of hate here until Mr. Hsiung posts his tag line to please be civil to the post by Scott where it is originally posted. His statement is insulting to Jews and leads a Jew to feel put down/accused all against the rules here and if nothing is done to the statement, then readers can think that it is not against the rules here, and worse, that it will be good on Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen as conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of the community.
> > > That is Mr. Hsiung's vision of his future community as being good for the whole. And if you are so easily persuaded by Mr. Hsiung to put your trust in him as he asks of you, remember who else said the same thing in his vision of his country about the Jews.
> > > And notice that Mr. Hsiung uses a lie to attempt to substantiate Scott's defamation of the Jews and me here as being supportive. Let us look at Scott's post where he says that I have to give up Judaism by converting to Christianity to be saved, which could mean that he thinks that all Jews are not saved unless they convert to Christianity. And look at Mr. Hsiung's attempt to allow the statement as civil by the tactic of evasion by putting up a false statement that readers could think is true because he says to trust him. His statement is false that says that [...Christians convert to Judaism as much as...], so why would you want to trust him? This is how anti-Semitism is created and developed. It is done by deceit and lies and the Great Deception which Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions to me here prevent me from posting here. By allowing Scott's post against the Jews and me as a Jew here, readers could think that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the claim by Scott that is against the Jew, leading readers to think that Jews are inferior to Christians because they are not saved, which could dehumanize and stigmatize Jews from people reading here and could lead those that understand how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community, to conclude that this is an anti-Semitic site. That is how the flames of hatred toward the Jews are spread, from sites like this where a psychiatrist leads readers to think that anti-Semitism is supportive and in his thinking for it being allowed to be seen that way, it will be good for his community as a whole. History shows otherwise.
> > > Lou
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1055904.html
> >
> > Friends,
> > Be not deceived. For Scott says that Mr. Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism or committed an anti-Semitic act. But what constitutes committing an anti-Semitic act here or what constitutes advocating anti-Semitism?
> > Anti-Semitism means {against the Jew} as one method to determine if what is in question constitutes an anti-Semitic act of fosters anti-Semitism. If readers here are led by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record that are recruited by Mr. Hsiung to carry out his wishes, to manipulate the content here so that the site here is against the Jew, then that fits what Scott says he does not see. The content can be controlled by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies by allowing hatred toward me to be allowed to be seen as supportive, for Mr. Hsiung states that being supportive takes precedence and worse, that if something is allowed to stand, he allows it {so that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's vision for this community as a whole}. This means that readers could conclude that whatever is standing un repudiated by Mr. Hsiung or his deputies or record, that even anti-Semitic propaganda or hatred toward me standing will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole for it to be seen that way. In the following, defamation toward me is allowed to stand where it is originally posted and Mr. Hsiung refuses to post his tag line to be civil to the post. but it is much more than that. For the slander is against me, the Jewish member, and what is said about my character could apply to all Jews, which could encourage other posters to think of Jews as being the character of what is allowed to stand here about me. This is one way anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community to arouse ill-will toward a Jewish member, denying the Jew equal protection of the rules, defaming Judaism itself. The allowing of the defamation toward me by the poster with impunity creates a mind-set to readers that Jews are inferior members here that are allowed to be mocked and taunted and ridiculed, all against all known psychiatric priniciples that say that putting down or accusing someone is not conducive to sound mental-health. And for readers to see that I am allowed to be ridiculed and mocked and taunted with impunity here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, they could think that anti-Semitism is supportive and will be good for them, for in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, he does what will be good for the community as a whole. I say that those that are understanding of European Fascism, already know what the consequences that occurred to Jews when the leader allowed hatred toward the Jews to be allowed with impunity which made them think that the state was encouraging anti-Semitic hate. This is known as state-sponsored anti-Semitism.
> > Scott say that he does not se it. Do you?
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130702/msgs/1048569.html
>
> Friends,
> To create and develop anti-Semitic hate can be done in a community in more than just allowing what is against the Jew to stand as being supportive here. Here is a partial list of other tactics used in the historical record that tyrants bent on defaming the Jews have used to foster anti-Semitic hate that would be good in their vision for their community as a whole. Scott says that he can not see these. Can you?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/844279.htmlFriends,
If you are claiming that you just don't see, here is something that could help you to understand the sense of the problem where this on-line community has the potential to create a community of acceptance for hatred of the Jews, socially acceptable, creating a foundation for real-world hate and violence toward Jews.
The anti-Semitic propagandaa allowed here to be seen as supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those members in concert with them, skillfully spreads lies about the Jews and perpetuates centuries of old anti-Semitic stereotypes that can create a climate of hatred, suspicion and indifference, socially acceptable as can be thought to be such because a psychiatrist is allowing lies about Jews to be woven into the fiber of this community that can recruit young people reading here to be infected with the virus of hatred toward the Jews as they can be misled here to think that anti-Semitic propaganda is being ratified by a psychiatrist and up to 6 deputies and members in concert with them that are allowed to post anti-Semitic hate here with impunity.
Here is a way that this is fostered here by Mr. Hsiung where it could be seen that he himself is encouraging readers to think that it is good to post what could put down Judaism itself, which is called ant-Judaism. I the following post by him, he thanks the poster for posting what could be thought to be that Christiandom is superior to Judaism, or Judaism is inferior to Christiandom, all against his own rules to not post what could lead one to feel that their faith is being put down. It is a powerful influence when a psychiatrist posts what readers could think that he is validating hatred towad the Jews being posted in his community and that he says that by whatever he allows it will be good for this community as a whole in his vision of his future community here. If that is going to be good in his thinking, and he also asks for you to put your trust in him, then that IMHHHHHHO could lead vulnerable children taking mind-altering drugs reading here to grow up thinking that hatred toward the Jews could be acted out in real life. And along with all the other anti-Semitic statements that he allows to be seen here as being supportive, for he states that being supportive takes precedence, that could give non-Jewish children the false thinking of them being superior to Jews, and could lead Jewish children to feel devalued here as being inferior to Christiandom people being ratified by a psychiatrist. This IMHHHHHHO could lead to further depression being induced into some readers here by Mr. Hsuing himself, which could lead to suicides and murders. I do not want those victim's blood to be upon me.
Her is the post by Mr. Hsiung thanking the poster for what she posted about Judaism that could lead others to think that Judaism is being put down as an inferior faith to Christiandom.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20060614/msgs/738373.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2015, at 7:16:10
In reply to Lou's Little Shopp-create and develop antisemitism, posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2015, at 7:09:59
> > > > > > > > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I guess he could.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Scott
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scott,
> > > > > > You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
> > > > > > As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
> > > > > > Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
> > > > > > The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
> > > > > > Lou
> > > > >
> > > > > Friends,
> > > > > Who has believed my report? And to whom has it been given here to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity? And how many posts will it take for readers to see what is plainly visible?
> > > > > The hatred toward Jews lives here to be seen as supportive and worse, that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen that way. This is not new but an old tactic from the middle ages carries by the flames of hate to this day burning here producing the flames of hate perpetually that could foster hatred all over the world to hate groups seeing that a psychiatrist allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive by him and ratified by the silence of up to 6 deputies all recruited to implement the wishes of Mr. Hsiung.
> > > > > One of the most insidious tactics to spread hatred toward the Jews is to use a Jdew or Jews as scapegoats for one's blaming a Jew or Jews for the real or imagined ills of a state, country, business, club, community, workplace ect.
> > > > > Here we have myself, the Jewish member trying to purge out from here the old hatreds toward the Jews allowed to be promoted by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and those in concert with them by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record allowing anti-Semitic propaganda and scapegoating a Jew, myself here, by refusing to act on my notifications that allow hatred and scapegoating to be seen as supportive.
> > > > > Let us examine what is in the following post from here and the offered links within the post. When scapegoating is allowed to be promoted as that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole, a psychiatrist's thinking can be a powerful ally to terrorists to seek out others as scapegoats and commit mass-murder, even blaming their victims for bringing disease to their community. This ancient tactic, called {poisoning the well} has been used against Jews for centuries. And those of you that want to put your trust in Mr. Hsiung as he asks for you to do in that whatever he allows here to be seen as supportive will in his thinking be good for this community as a whole, I ask you that pretend that you just don't see, and those that here that can see what is plainly visible here, that as long as you allow the swastika to be posted here by Mr. Hsiung, and scapegoating to be allowed to be justified by Mr. Hsiung, and members allowed to post anti-Semitic propaganda with impunity here, this site will continue to produce the flames of hate. And those flames could consume you. Let us examine this post closely by Scott. Also notice Mr. Hsiung's rational for allowing Scott's statement about me by reading the thread.
> > > > > Lou
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075146.html
> > > >
> > > > Friends,
> > > > Be not deceived. The use of deceit and lies do not annul the fact of what is plainly visible here in that Mr. Hsiung is allowing Scott and others to defame Judaism and insult the faith of Jews and me as a Jew here by using ancient tactics of Jew-haters that stoke the furnace of hatred against the Jews to come from here to go all over the world in the homes of those with internet access and those that hold the internet in their hands.
> > > > One of the ancient tactics of Jew-haters is to claim that Jews are not saved and worse, they have to convert to Christianity to be saved. That tactic promulgated during the dark ages and carried by the flame of hate here, fostered by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, is anti-Semitic on its face for it is against the Jew, claiming that Judaism can not lead Jews to salvation, assigning the Jews to everlasting torment in hell according to the anti-Semitic agendas of many mainstream Christian sects throughout history. Jews were subjected to torture or burning at the stake if they did not convert to Christiandom by those sects. Yet today, this site upholds the ancient backward hate promulgated here by Scott here and can be seen as being supportive by Mr. Hsiung and any deputy of record as Scott's post insulting to the Jews is allowed to be a perpetual flame of hate here until Mr. Hsiung posts his tag line to please be civil to the post by Scott where it is originally posted. His statement is insulting to Jews and leads a Jew to feel put down/accused all against the rules here and if nothing is done to the statement, then readers can think that it is not against the rules here, and worse, that it will be good on Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole to be seen as conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of the community.
> > > > That is Mr. Hsiung's vision of his future community as being good for the whole. And if you are so easily persuaded by Mr. Hsiung to put your trust in him as he asks of you, remember who else said the same thing in his vision of his country about the Jews.
> > > > And notice that Mr. Hsiung uses a lie to attempt to substantiate Scott's defamation of the Jews and me here as being supportive. Let us look at Scott's post where he says that I have to give up Judaism by converting to Christianity to be saved, which could mean that he thinks that all Jews are not saved unless they convert to Christianity. And look at Mr. Hsiung's attempt to allow the statement as civil by the tactic of evasion by putting up a false statement that readers could think is true because he says to trust him. His statement is false that says that [...Christians convert to Judaism as much as...], so why would you want to trust him? This is how anti-Semitism is created and developed. It is done by deceit and lies and the Great Deception which Mr. Hsiung's prohibitions to me here prevent me from posting here. By allowing Scott's post against the Jews and me as a Jew here, readers could think that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the claim by Scott that is against the Jew, leading readers to think that Jews are inferior to Christians because they are not saved, which could dehumanize and stigmatize Jews from people reading here and could lead those that understand how anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community, to conclude that this is an anti-Semitic site. That is how the flames of hatred toward the Jews are spread, from sites like this where a psychiatrist leads readers to think that anti-Semitism is supportive and in his thinking for it being allowed to be seen that way, it will be good for his community as a whole. History shows otherwise.
> > > > Lou
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130903/msgs/1055904.html
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > Be not deceived. For Scott says that Mr. Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism or committed an anti-Semitic act. But what constitutes committing an anti-Semitic act here or what constitutes advocating anti-Semitism?
> > > Anti-Semitism means {against the Jew} as one method to determine if what is in question constitutes an anti-Semitic act of fosters anti-Semitism. If readers here are led by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record that are recruited by Mr. Hsiung to carry out his wishes, to manipulate the content here so that the site here is against the Jew, then that fits what Scott says he does not see. The content can be controlled by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies by allowing hatred toward me to be allowed to be seen as supportive, for Mr. Hsiung states that being supportive takes precedence and worse, that if something is allowed to stand, he allows it {so that it will be good in Mr. Hsiung's vision for this community as a whole}. This means that readers could conclude that whatever is standing un repudiated by Mr. Hsiung or his deputies or record, that even anti-Semitic propaganda or hatred toward me standing will be good in Mr. Hsiung's thinking for the community as a whole for it to be seen that way. In the following, defamation toward me is allowed to stand where it is originally posted and Mr. Hsiung refuses to post his tag line to be civil to the post. but it is much more than that. For the slander is against me, the Jewish member, and what is said about my character could apply to all Jews, which could encourage other posters to think of Jews as being the character of what is allowed to stand here about me. This is one way anti-Semitism is created and developed in a community to arouse ill-will toward a Jewish member, denying the Jew equal protection of the rules, defaming Judaism itself. The allowing of the defamation toward me by the poster with impunity creates a mind-set to readers that Jews are inferior members here that are allowed to be mocked and taunted and ridiculed, all against all known psychiatric priniciples that say that putting down or accusing someone is not conducive to sound mental-health. And for readers to see that I am allowed to be ridiculed and mocked and taunted with impunity here by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record, they could think that anti-Semitism is supportive and will be good for them, for in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, he does what will be good for the community as a whole. I say that those that are understanding of European Fascism, already know what the consequences that occurred to Jews when the leader allowed hatred toward the Jews to be allowed with impunity which made them think that the state was encouraging anti-Semitic hate. This is known as state-sponsored anti-Semitism.
> > > Scott say that he does not se it. Do you?
> > > Lou
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130702/msgs/1048569.html
> >
> > Friends,
> > To create and develop anti-Semitic hate can be done in a community in more than just allowing what is against the Jew to stand as being supportive here. Here is a partial list of other tactics used in the historical record that tyrants bent on defaming the Jews have used to foster anti-Semitic hate that would be good in their vision for their community as a whole. Scott says that he can not see these. Can you?
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/844279.html
>
> Friends,
> If you are claiming that you just don't see, here is something that could help you to understand the sense of the problem where this on-line community has the potential to create a community of acceptance for hatred of the Jews, socially acceptable, creating a foundation for real-world hate and violence toward Jews.
> The anti-Semitic propagandaa allowed here to be seen as supportive by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those members in concert with them, skillfully spreads lies about the Jews and perpetuates centuries of old anti-Semitic stereotypes that can create a climate of hatred, suspicion and indifference, socially acceptable as can be thought to be such because a psychiatrist is allowing lies about Jews to be woven into the fiber of this community that can recruit young people reading here to be infected with the virus of hatred toward the Jews as they can be misled here to think that anti-Semitic propaganda is being ratified by a psychiatrist and up to 6 deputies and members in concert with them that are allowed to post anti-Semitic hate here with impunity.
> Here is a way that this is fostered here by Mr. Hsiung where it could be seen that he himself is encouraging readers to think that it is good to post what could put down Judaism itself, which is called ant-Judaism. I the following post by him, he thanks the poster for posting what could be thought to be that Christiandom is superior to Judaism, or Judaism is inferior to Christiandom, all against his own rules to not post what could lead one to feel that their faith is being put down. It is a powerful influence when a psychiatrist posts what readers could think that he is validating hatred towad the Jews being posted in his community and that he says that by whatever he allows it will be good for this community as a whole in his vision of his future community here. If that is going to be good in his thinking, and he also asks for you to put your trust in him, then that IMHHHHHHO could lead vulnerable children taking mind-altering drugs reading here to grow up thinking that hatred toward the Jews could be acted out in real life. And along with all the other anti-Semitic statements that he allows to be seen here as being supportive, for he states that being supportive takes precedence, that could give non-Jewish children the false thinking of them being superior to Jews, and could lead Jewish children to feel devalued here as being inferior to Christiandom people being ratified by a psychiatrist. This IMHHHHHHO could lead to further depression being induced into some readers here by Mr. Hsuing himself, which could lead to suicides and murders. I do not want those victim's blood to be upon me.
> Her is the post by Mr. Hsiung thanking the poster for what she posted about Judaism that could lead others to think that Judaism is being put down as an inferior faith to Christiandom.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20060614/msgs/738373.htmlcorrect:
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20060614/msgs/735373.html
Posted by SLS on July 3, 2015, at 7:32:10
In reply to Lou's Little Shopp-correct- develop antisemitism, posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2015, at 7:16:10
For anyone who finds my post here uncivil, you can use:
"Notify the administrators"
It is located at the bottom of this page.
I do try to adhere to the following policy:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#three
"
Can I post as much as I want?Please share this site with others by not starting more than 3 consecutive threads on the same board or posting more than 3 consecutive follow-ups in the same thread. More than that may discourage less confident posters from joining in. Giving them more of a chance makes it easier for them also to help -- and to feel good about doing so.
There are exceptions to every rule, and those to this one may include:
Responding to earlier posts one at a time.
Playing around with others at Psycho-Babble Social.
During meltdowns, clarifying posts many times.
Keeping a diary.
"- Scott
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.