Posted by Lou Pilder on June 25, 2015, at 9:15:45
In reply to Administrative issue. » ClearSkies, posted by SLS on June 24, 2015, at 19:11:49
> > Personally, I don't believe that Dr Bob is involved in this site on a day to day basis. Perhaps you can take up your case with the Antidefamation League.
>
> I guess he could.
>
> I've recommended that to Mr. Pilder on several occasions.
>
> To the best of my knowledge, Dr. Hsiung has never advocated antisemitism nor committed an antisemitic act. Perhaps some would disagree.
>
> This stuff should really be pursued on the Administration board.
>
> That's about all I have to say on this topic while we remain on the Medication board.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote, [...To the best of my knowledge (Mr.) Hsiung has never advocated anti-Semitism nor committed an anti-Semitic act...].
As to what constitutes {committing and anti-Semitic act} or as to what constitutes {advocating anti-Semitism}, that has a generally accepted understanding by what courts of law have rendered opinions as, and how different jurisdiction's laws prescribe and define as hate speech. But the overriding definition used to determine if , let's say, Mr. Hsiung is advocating anti-Semitism here or committing an anti-Semitic act, the question to determine that is if what is in question {is against the Jew}.
Here we are in a community governed by Mr. Hsiung. He makes the rules. In a community, if the rules are {against the Jew}, then that constitutes anti-Semitism directly by having two standards so that the Jew is held to a different standard that the non-Jews in the community, or anti-Semitism could be advocated by the rule-drafter if the Jew is denied equal protection of the rules. This is exemplified by what Jefferson wrote in {The Declaration}, [...We hold these truths self-evident that all men are created equal...]. When the community leader that makes the rules allows members to post insulting statements against Judaism, or accusations toward the Jews, or dehumanizing characterizations of the Jews, or stereotyping or stigmatizing of the Jews, or posts defamatory statements about a Jew or statements that could insult Judaism itself, and allows those statements to be seen as supportive and that they will be good in the leader's thinking to be good for his community as a whole, then that is {against the Jew}, as myself here, and are anti-Semitic policies on it's face. Mr. Hsiung can post all of his self-made justifications to give himself the allowing of him to do that, and some members here that are easily manipulated to allow him to do so, can be in concert with him to post antismeitism here with impunity as can be seen here.
The policy of Mr. Hsiung to leave my notifications outstanding where he says that he will act on the notifications of others, is anti-Semitic on it's face because it crerates two standards that denies me, the Jewish poster here, from having equal protection of his rules as that he will not act on my notifications that conmcern anti-Semitic statements which allows those statements to stand as being seen as supportive as he states that being supportive takes precedence and that if something is not acted on him that it is not agasinst his rules. So anti-Semitism not acted on by him is done by {De Jure} which make it his policy. If the policy is against the Jew, it is an anti-Semitic policy and then this site is an anti-Semitic site just as if a city or country denied a Jew equal protection of their laws, that country would be an anti-Semitic country because it denies the Jew equal protection of it's laws that could lead to Jews being victims of anti-Semitic violence. As long as Mr. Hsiung leaves my notifications outstanding, he is denying me equal protection of his rules that could lead to not only myself being a victim of anti-Semitic violence, but Jews all over the world also because readers could see that the anti-Semitic statements being allowed to stand could mean to some that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those posters here in concert with them to be validating and ratifying the hate. That is a powerful influence in particular to those readers that take mind-altering drugs in collaboration with a psychiatrist, as a psychiatrist could be seen here as fostering hatred toward the Jews because he further states that by him leaving anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, he ids doing that because in his thinking by doing that, it will be good for his community as a whole. That is his self-made justification which some jurists could constitute malice and be a pretext for using his site to advance anti-Semitic hate. This is further exemplified by him posting the swastika against his own drafted rules to not post anything about Nazis or the holocaust and refusing to delete it or post a repudiation to the post directly where it is originally posted. The swatsika posted by Mr. Hsiung is a backward vision of psychopaths and posted by him could escalate hatred toward the Jews as readers could see a psychiatrist posting the swastika and refusing to delete it. The posting of the swastika by him reveals a broader view of Mr. Hsiung's vision of his community that will be good for the whole. It could trigger anitsemitic hostility all over the world which a subset of readers could think that Mr. Hsiung is attempting to publically devalue Jews. Hopefully readers will not pretend that they just don't see what is plainly visible here and stop Mr. Hsiung and all those in concert with them from having their victory. In [ admin, 428781 ], here is where Mr. Hsiung did not abide by his own rules and will not post his tag line to please be civil to the anti-Semitic statements which started the fire of hate here that is still burning. Anyone that wants to justify Mr. Hsiung leaving the horrible dehumanizing accusations toward the Jews to be seen without his tag line to be civil, or pretend that you just don't see, please post your justification for such here and then I will have the opportunity to respond to you accordingly.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1079663
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150520/msgs/1079969.html