Psycho-Babble Medication Thread 306217

Shown: posts 11 to 35 of 45. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Do anti-psychotics act on dopamine the same as » jerrympls

Posted by scott-d-o on January 28, 2004, at 1:31:25

In reply to Re: Do anti-psychotics act on dopamine the same as » scott-d-o, posted by jerrympls on January 27, 2004, at 22:32:43

> Thanks for the info. Yeah I understand. I used to know all this stuff - however all these meds have my brain in a fog. I certainly believe that my dopamingeric system is wy out of whack. Amphetamines help - but after a while it seems as if they cause the opposite reaction - as described by the negative feedback system you explain above. So I'm wondering about Ritalin/Concerta because it blocks reuptake of dopamine as well as release it - from what I understand. THEN I'm thinking about augmenting with Mirapex - about which I have heard some extraordinarily postive stories from others on this board - saying that it renewed their creativity, pleasure, motivation, etc.


actually, you have ritalin and amphetamines backwards. yes, ritalin is a monoamine reuptake blocker with a high affinity for dopamine.

however, it is the amphetamines that bind to the dopamine transporter and actually reverse its action, not only blocking reuptake but causing a release of dopamine into the synapse, as opposed to transporting dopamine back into the presynaptic neuron like it's supposed to do. cocaine and methylphenidate merely block the transporter causing it to do jack sh*t.

augmenting your adderall with mirapex doesn't sound like a great idea to me if you are non-responsive to stimulants due to supersensitive dopamine autoreceptors. if this is the case, the mirapex will most likely cause these receptors to activate and decrease dopamine release. NMDA antagonists can help with stimulant tolerance. magnesium supplementation (300% of the RDA of a highly bioavailable compound) is the natural way to go about this; memantine is a med that has this direct action on these receptors.


>
> My depression is rescurrent/refractory/resistant - you name it - and SSRI's just dull me. SNRI's aren't much different from SSRI's for me. Opiates work very well.
>
> I don't want to add an anti-psychotic to be honest. I'm already on 200mg of Seroquel for insomnia. My doc said that Geodon or Abilify may help - but all I can imagine is brain dulling and sleepiness and/or akathesia.
>
> So, we agreed to start Adderall XR 10mg. I've been on Adderall before at this dose and it had a MUCH MUCH more powerful effect the first time I was on it (about 3 years ago). Now it's like I'm taking nothing. My receptors are all screwed up.
>
> What to do? What to try? ugh....
>
> But thanks for your help....I greatly appreciate it.
>
> Jerry


an antipsychotic could help you at low-dose; I haven't tried abilify but I had a terrible experience with geodon. it is definitly not dopaminergic even at it's lowest dose of 20mg. I didn't try splitting the capsules for a lower dose. sulpiride or amisulpride are the two antipsychotics that are the most selective for dopamine autoreceptors. at low doses they can increase dopamine release without disturbing DA transmission too badly. unforunately, they are not approved in the usa; you could get a script and order from overseas thou. if you want to stick w/fda-approved meds the closest thing is stelazine (trifluoperazine). start at only 1mg don't go over 2mg.

hope this helps,
scott

 

I think we need to start a Dopamine Club here... » scott-d-o

Posted by Karen Moore on January 28, 2004, at 1:37:14

In reply to Re: Do anti-psychotics act on dopamine the same as, posted by scott-d-o on January 28, 2004, at 1:00:41

Excellent, thanks for your thought provoking response, Scott.
I dropped Effexor ages ago and found out quickly with other trials that SSRIs make me absolutely miserable. ADD is the least of my problems, I was taking it for agitated depression, but now I find myself fitting into the bipolar spectrum. Stimulants make me a little hypomanic if I'm not careful, but it's the pleasant sort rather than the dysphoric flavor. As for sleep drugs, I've tried benzos, trazadone, sonata, anti-convulsants, all nada, my brain just doesn't want to ever shut down. And if I don't sleep I get downright manic. I just finished putting together a summary sheet to see a psych. researcher tomorrow (s.dubovsky) and counted 31 prescription drug trials in the last 2 and half years! And that doesn't count some of the other unsanctioned pharmacology experiments I've put myself through...
OK. There's my whine for the evening.
Thanks again,
KM
P.S. Have you ever heard of anyone having LOW blood pressure problems on stimulants? And I don't mean orthostatic hypotension... My only theory so far is cortisol, but that hasn't proven to be the problem (yet).


> >
>
> hey karen,
>
> the fact that seroquel alleviated your effexor-induced mania does not suprise me, since it is a alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist. mania is usually caused by an excess of norepinephrine, of which effexor blocks it's reuptake into presynaptic neurons. central alpha-1 adrenergic receptors are postsynaptic and central alpha-2 adrenergic receptors are presynaptic. therefore, the alpha-1 antagonism of seroquel blunted your brains response to the increase norepinephrine from effexor.
>
> I agree the effects of seroquel on your dopaminergic system at that dose cannot be helpful. Surely there is another drug out there that will help you sleep. I assume you've already tried benzos, ambien, sonata?
>
> If your insomnia does not respond to gaba potentiating meds then what about trazodone? It acts solely via serotonin receptors.
>
> If seroquel is the only thing that keeps you sane while on effexor, than perhaps you should not be on effexor. Are you taking the effexor for ADD? Do you have the same manic reaction to stimulants?
>
> scott
>

 

Re: I think we need to start a Dopamine Club here. » Karen Moore

Posted by scott-d-o on January 28, 2004, at 3:42:22

In reply to I think we need to start a Dopamine Club here... » scott-d-o, posted by Karen Moore on January 28, 2004, at 1:37:14

> Excellent, thanks for your thought provoking response, Scott.
> I dropped Effexor ages ago and found out quickly with other trials that SSRIs make me absolutely miserable. ADD is the least of my problems, I was taking it for agitated depression, but now I find myself fitting into the bipolar spectrum. Stimulants make me a little hypomanic if I'm not careful, but it's the pleasant sort rather than the dysphoric flavor. As for sleep drugs, I've tried benzos, trazadone, sonata, anti-convulsants, all nada, my brain just doesn't want to ever shut down. And if I don't sleep I get downright manic. I just finished putting together a summary sheet to see a psych. researcher tomorrow (s.dubovsky) and counted 31 prescription drug trials in the last 2 and half years! And that doesn't count some of the other unsanctioned pharmacology experiments I've put myself through...
> OK. There's my whine for the evening.
> Thanks again,
> KM


hi karen,

sounds like you've been thru a lotta meds.. assuming I was correct about your insomnia being provoked by excess NE, believe it or not, I can still sit here all nite and name meds that could help until I come up with one you haven't tried..

how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does, however it is also a very potent antihistamine (sedative), and also has alpha-1 antagonism (which I assumed was the reason seroquel helps your insomnia.) In fact, the only reason effexor was supposed to be an improvement over older tricyclics, such as doxepin, is because effexor doesn't have the sedative and anticholinergic action of TCA's. doxepin also happens to be a 5-HT2a antagonist, again like seroquel, and this should help with the insomnia as well.. sounds like the best of both meds for you..

> P.S. Have you ever heard of anyone having LOW blood pressure problems on stimulants? And I don't mean orthostatic hypotension... My only theory so far is cortisol, but that hasn't proven to be the problem (yet).

yeh.. sounds like your on the right track.. raised cortisol levels in plasma.. for the insomnia you should definitly try the alpha-2 agonist clonidine; assuming you don't like the doxepin idea. but go slow; I know for sure the clonidine will knock ya out like never b4 ;-)

scott

 

Re: I think we need to start a Dopamine Club here. » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on January 28, 2004, at 23:14:54

In reply to Re: I think we need to start a Dopamine Club here. » Karen Moore, posted by scott-d-o on January 28, 2004, at 3:42:22

> how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does, however it is also a very potent antihistamine (sedative), and also has alpha-1 antagonism (which I assumed was the reason seroquel helps your insomnia.) In fact, the only reason effexor was supposed to be an improvement over older tricyclics, such as doxepin, is because effexor doesn't have the sedative and anticholinergic action of TCA's. doxepin also happens to be a 5-HT2a antagonist, again like seroquel, and this should help with the insomnia as well.. sounds like the best of both meds for you..
>

Doxepin is an extremely weak serotonin reuptake inhibitor but it is powerful at blocking histamine, the only thing stronger is Mirtazapine. Efexor is a weak norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Benzos don't make me drowsy but Mirtazapine certainly does.

Cheers,
Panda.

 

doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-topic » Sad Panda

Posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 0:43:09

In reply to Re: I think we need to start a Dopamine Club here. » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on January 28, 2004, at 23:14:54

> > how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does, however it is also a very potent antihistamine (sedative), and also has alpha-1 antagonism (which I assumed was the reason seroquel helps your insomnia.) In fact, the only reason effexor was supposed to be an improvement over older tricyclics, such as doxepin, is because effexor doesn't have the sedative and anticholinergic action of TCA's. doxepin also happens to be a 5-HT2a antagonist, again like seroquel, and this should help with the insomnia as well.. sounds like the best of both meds for you..
> >
>
> Doxepin is an extremely weak serotonin reuptake inhibitor but it is powerful at blocking histamine, the only thing stronger is Mirtazapine. Efexor is a weak norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Benzos don't make me drowsy but Mirtazapine certainly does.
>
> Cheers,
> Panda.
>

not sure what you're correcting from my post, I believe my exact words were that doxepin is a "very potent antihistamine."

mirtazapine isn't nearly as strong an antihistamine as doxepin, doxepin binds very strongly to both histamine receptors, while mirtazapine only has a weak action at the h1 receptor.

the antagonism at 5-HT2/3 serotonin receptors is probably more responsibile for the drowsiness you experience from remeron.. and by no means is effexor a "weak" NE reuptake inhibitor, although it does like the serotonin transporter a bit more.. you are right however if you were just pointing out that, comparitively, doxepin has a higher affinity for the NE trans, and effexor has a higher affinity for the SERT rather than the NET.

scott

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-topic » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on January 29, 2004, at 1:09:59

In reply to doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-topic » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 0:43:09

> > > how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does, however it is also a very potent antihistamine (sedative), and also has alpha-1 antagonism (which I assumed was the reason seroquel helps your insomnia.) In fact, the only reason effexor was supposed to be an improvement over older tricyclics, such as doxepin, is because effexor doesn't have the sedative and anticholinergic action of TCA's. doxepin also happens to be a 5-HT2a antagonist, again like seroquel, and this should help with the insomnia as well.. sounds like the best of both meds for you..
> > >
> >
> > Doxepin is an extremely weak serotonin reuptake inhibitor but it is powerful at blocking histamine, the only thing stronger is Mirtazapine. Efexor is a weak norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Benzos don't make me drowsy but Mirtazapine certainly does.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Panda.
> >
>
> not sure what you're correcting from my post, I believe my exact words were that doxepin is a "very potent antihistamine."
>
> mirtazapine isn't nearly as strong an antihistamine as doxepin, doxepin binds very strongly to both histamine receptors, while mirtazapine only has a weak action at the h1 receptor.
>
> the antagonism at 5-HT2/3 serotonin receptors is probably more responsibile for the drowsiness you experience from remeron.. and by no means is effexor a "weak" NE reuptake inhibitor, although it does like the serotonin transporter a bit more.. you are right however if you were just pointing out that, comparitively, doxepin has a higher affinity for the NE trans, and effexor has a higher affinity for the SERT rather than the NET.
>
> scott

Scott, I think if you do some research you will find that Mirtazapine is stronger than Doxepin at blocking H1. 5-HT2a is similar for both while the 5-HT3 abilites of Mirtazapine is great for reversing SSRI & Efexor induced nausea.

>>>how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does

These 2 meds are nearly opposite to each other. Efexor main effect is on Serotonin while Doxepin has practically no effect on Serotonin.

Karen, if you haven't tried either Mirtazapine or Doxepin for sleep then I think they are worth a try.


Cheers,
Panda.

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » Sad Panda

Posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 4:02:57

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-topic » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on January 29, 2004, at 1:09:59

> > Scott, I think if you do some research you will find that Mirtazapine is stronger than Doxepin at blocking H1. 5-HT2a is similar for both while the 5-HT3 abilites of Mirtazapine is great for reversing SSRI & Efexor induced nausea.
>
> >>>how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does
>
> These 2 meds are nearly opposite to each other. Efexor main effect is on Serotonin while Doxepin has practically no effect on Serotonin.
>
> Karen, if you haven't tried either Mirtazapine or Doxepin for sleep then I think they are worth a try.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Panda.
>
>

Umn, they are not opposite to each other at all. they both inhibit the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, sounds similar to me. so effexor has a little higher affinity for the serotonin transporter relative to norepinephrine than does doxepin, so what?

I don't kno where u get your info but doxepin was the most powerful antihistamine of the tricyclics and remeron is a second-generation AD that is a very weak antihistamine. here's some abstracts off medline.. note the words *very weak* in the first abstract and *weaker* in the second abstract in regard to mirtazapine's antihistaminic properties..

--------------------------------------------


Review of the results from clinical studies on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression.

Fawcett J, Barkin RL.

Department of Psychiatry, Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist that has dual action by increasing noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. The enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission is specifically mediated via 5-HT1 receptors because mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist. In addition, mirtazapine has only a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors and has very weak muscarinic anticholinergic and histamine (H1) antagonist properties.


----------------------------------------------

[Antidepressives of the 3rd, 4th and 5th generation]

[Article in Czech]

Svestka J.

Psychiatricka klinika Lekarske fakulty MU, Brno.

Antidepressants are classified into five generations. Preparations of the first generation affect various neurotransmitter systems and are therefore associated with many undesirable effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants, maprotiline). The second generation of antidepressants is already devoid of anticholinergic action and their adrenolytic and antihistaminic effects are weaker (e.g. mianserine, mirtazapine, trazodone).

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on January 29, 2004, at 7:44:35

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 4:02:57

> > > Scott, I think if you do some research you will find that Mirtazapine is stronger than Doxepin at blocking H1. 5-HT2a is similar for both while the 5-HT3 abilites of Mirtazapine is great for reversing SSRI & Efexor induced nausea.
> >
> > >>>how about switching the effexor to the old tricyclic doxepin.. it blocks reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, like effexor does
> >
> > These 2 meds are nearly opposite to each other. Efexor main effect is on Serotonin while Doxepin has practically no effect on Serotonin.
> >
> > Karen, if you haven't tried either Mirtazapine or Doxepin for sleep then I think they are worth a try.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Panda.
> >
> >
>
> Umn, they are not opposite to each other at all. they both inhibit the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, sounds similar to me. so effexor has a little higher affinity for the serotonin transporter relative to norepinephrine than does doxepin, so what?
>
> I don't kno where u get your info but doxepin was the most powerful antihistamine of the tricyclics and remeron is a second-generation AD that is a very weak antihistamine. here's some abstracts off medline.. note the words *very weak* in the first abstract and *weaker* in the second abstract in regard to mirtazapine's antihistaminic properties..
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
> Review of the results from clinical studies on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression.
>
> Fawcett J, Barkin RL.
>
> Department of Psychiatry, Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
>
> Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist that has dual action by increasing noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. The enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission is specifically mediated via 5-HT1 receptors because mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist. In addition, mirtazapine has only a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors and has very weak muscarinic anticholinergic and histamine (H1) antagonist properties.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [Antidepressives of the 3rd, 4th and 5th generation]
>
> [Article in Czech]
>
> Svestka J.
>
> Psychiatricka klinika Lekarske fakulty MU, Brno.
>
> Antidepressants are classified into five generations. Preparations of the first generation affect various neurotransmitter systems and are therefore associated with many undesirable effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants, maprotiline). The second generation of antidepressants is already devoid of anticholinergic action and their adrenolytic and antihistaminic effects are weaker (e.g. mianserine, mirtazapine, trazodone).
>

Scott, I am familiar with the first abstract, it says
1. Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist
2. Mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist
3. Mirtazapine has a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors
4. Mirtazapine is a very weak muscarinic anticholinergic antagonist
5. Mirtazapine is a histamine (H1) antagonist

It DOES NOT say weak or very weak histamine anatgonist.

The second abstract is incorrect. Mianserin is a potent anti-histamine too as it is the older brother of Mirtazapine.

I will post some more about it when I find it again on the web.

Cheers,
Panda.

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top

Posted by katrina1 on January 29, 2004, at 12:02:47

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 4:02:57

Just my two cents: I take addrall and I take low dose zyprexa (2.5mg) & might add abilify (2.5 mg, tops), but boy do I get the stimulant resistance and low blood pressure thing...I could take 60 mgs. of adderall and still sleep like a cat at night. It's like the first 20mgs. does nothing. I've seen Dr. Dubovosky-he's insightful...
I'm gonna buy some magnesium...we were hoping the AP's could help with my profile that looks like the neg. side of scizophrenia (I'm not)??? It's such a crap shoot sometimes, I've never gotten remission-I'm even on subutex (partial opiate)...it helps take the teeth out of depression.

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top

Posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 14:44:47

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on January 29, 2004, at 7:44:35

>
> Scott, I am familiar with the first abstract, it says
> 1. Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist
> 2. Mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist
> 3. Mirtazapine has a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors
> 4. Mirtazapine is a very weak muscarinic anticholinergic antagonist
> 5. Mirtazapine is a histamine (H1) antagonist
>
> It DOES NOT say weak or very weak histamine anatgonist.
>
> The second abstract is incorrect. Mianserin is a potent anti-histamine too as it is the older brother of Mirtazapine.
>
> I will post some more about it when I find it again on the web.
>
> Cheers,
> Panda.
>

you're prob right about that abstract, like most abstracts, it is poorly worded.;-) I think doxepin has only slightly higher affinity than mirtazapine for h1 (I think mirtazapine binds with a pKi value around 9 and doxepin has a pKi around 10), but doxepin is not as selective and has much stronger h2 antagonism, so I think overall it is much more antihistaminic.. but then again I'm already sick of talking about it.. i guess a lot of it depends on where u get your data from also.

scott

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » katrina1

Posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 15:01:24

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top, posted by katrina1 on January 29, 2004, at 12:02:47

> Just my two cents: I take addrall and I take low dose zyprexa (2.5mg) & might add abilify (2.5 mg, tops), but boy do I get the stimulant resistance and low blood pressure thing...I could take 60 mgs. of adderall and still sleep like a cat at night. It's like the first 20mgs. does nothing. I've seen Dr. Dubovosky-he's insightful...
> I'm gonna buy some magnesium...we were hoping the AP's could help with my profile that looks like the neg. side of scizophrenia (I'm not)??? It's such a crap shoot sometimes, I've never gotten remission-I'm even on subutex (partial opiate)...it helps take the teeth out of depression.


maybe it's time to take a little break from adderall and see if that helps.. the drug they use in cough syrups, dextromethorphan, is also a NMDA antagonist.. some people use it recreationally cause it feels like ketamine or PCP at high doses (disassociative).. normally you can only get it by itself in the disgusting syrups but I stumbled upon new "Robitussin CoughGels" at the pharmacy the other day.. not sure how they got it fda approved considering abuse potential.. liquid gelcaps with Dextromethmorphan 15mg as the only active ingredient.. I may have to try them out ;-) Not sure if it will do anything for my stim tolerance, which was so bad some years ago that at one point I fell asleep like 15 mins after doing 100mg of pure meth..

 

Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on January 31, 2004, at 9:12:21

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top, posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 14:44:47

>
> you're prob right about that abstract, like most abstracts, it is poorly worded.;-) I think doxepin has only slightly higher affinity than mirtazapine for h1 (I think mirtazapine binds with a pKi value around 9 and doxepin has a pKi around 10), but doxepin is not as selective and has much stronger h2 antagonism, so I think overall it is much more antihistaminic.. but then again I'm already sick of talking about it.. i guess a lot of it depends on where u get your data from also.
>
> scott

Hi Scott,

I'm not sick of talking about it yet :)

I don't know how strong Mirtazapine is at H2 antagonism, AFAIK H2 antagonism controls acid in the stomach, I'm only interested in H1 because of what it does for sleep. Stomach juice talk would be getting way off topic. ;)

Here is an article that says Mirtazapine is a potent H1 blocker & references the exact same paper by Fawcett J & Barkin RL. You can read it all at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/410902_print Here is a snip:

"Mirtazapine is also a potent antagonist at central and peripheral histamine (H1) receptors, which may explain its sedative effects. Unlike maprotiline, mirtazapine has little activity at muscarinic or peripheral a1adrenergic receptors.[1-4]

References
1. Holm KJ, Markham A. Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression. Drugs 1999;57:607-31.
2. Tetracyclic antidepressants. In: Olin BR, ed. Drug Facts and Comparisons. St. Louis: Facts and Comparisons. 2000:900-3.
3. Remeron® product information. Organon. April 1996.
4. Fawcett J, Barkin RL. A meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:123-7."


Here is another snip from: http://www.psychotropical.com/notes/637.html

"Mirtazapine (6-azamianserin) was, for good reasons***, first tested as a sedative around 1982 - 1985. It is of significance and interest to note one of the earliest papers in 1985; the title introduced it as a "new antidepressant" even though there was no evidence at that time of any antidepressant efficacy in humans. The paper actually investigated only the sedative effect. There is nothing like establishing the idea before the facts.
***good reasons:-- we now know it is the most potent anti-histamine on the world market, eclipsing even doxepin."

"Like mianserin, mirtazapine is a potent H1 blocker (anti-histamine) and thus inevitably causes sedation and weight gain; indeed H1 blockade is the most potent property of both these drugs, mirtazapine being even more potent than doxepin."

"It is claimed to give relief from the ubiquitous anxiety symptoms of depression better and sooner than SSRIs, this is convincingly accounted for by its extremely potent sedative (and therefore anxiolytic) anti-histamine action. Indeed the first trial in 1985 was as a "pre-med" comparing its sedative / anxiolytic properties to diazepam. Mirtazapine 15 mg was equal to diazepam 10 mg."

Some receptor affinites from: http://www.psychotropical.com/notes/253.html

"Potency for blocking H1 and (A1) post-synaptic receptors

H1 blockade relates to a) sedation, and b) weight gain
A1 relates to postural hypotension and reflex tachycardia

mirtazapine 0.12 (-)
Doxepin 0.2 (23)
Mianserin 0.4 (34)
Amitriptyline 1 (24)
Dothiepin 3.6 (450)
Nortriptyline 6.3 (55)
Clomipramine 15 (50)
Imipramine 37 (32)
Desipramine 60 (100)
Nefazodone 24000 (48)
trazodone 1100 (42)
Sertraline 24000 (380)
venlafaxine 35000 (35000)


Doxepin and mirtazapine are the most potent antihistamines on the world market, indeed, because of this doxepin has been marketed as a topical skin preparation."

Mirtazapine is getting close to 2x stonger than Doxepin. People I have spoken with who have taken both say 15mg of Mirtazapine is about as potent as 25mg of Doxepin for sleep.

Here is another snip from http://www.biopsychiatry.com/

"Mirtazapine (Remeron) is a structural analogue of the off-patent mianserin (Bolvidon). It is a comparatively new drug - a so-called NaSSA. By blocking the inhibitory presynaptic alpha2 adrenergic autoreceptors and stimulating only the 5-HT1A receptors, mirtazapine enhances noradrenaline and serotonin release while also blocking two specific (5-HT2 and 5-HT3) serotonin receptors implicated in dark moods and anxiety. By contrast, stimulation of the 5-HT2A receptors accounts for the initial anxiety, insomnia and sexual dysfunction sometimes reported with the SSRIs; stimulation of the 5-HT3 receptors causes nausea. Unfortunately, mirtazapine is a potent blocker of the histamine H1 receptors too. So it tends to have a somewhat sedative effect. This profile may be good for agitated depressives and insomniacs."


Let me know if you want me to find some more info for you.

Cheers,
Panda.

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda

Posted by scott-d-o on February 1, 2004, at 1:31:33

In reply to Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on January 31, 2004, at 9:12:21

wow, you must have a lot of time on your hands :-)

keep in mind panda, doxepin is usually prescribed anywhere from 75mg all the way up to a max of 300mg, where as remeron has a *max* dose of 75mg.

according to your data, at the max dose that a pdoc will prescribe, u will get an overall sedative effect that is over 2 times as powerful from the doxepin than the remeron.

so if u have a h1 antagonism fetish, u best go ask your pdoc for doxepin.. ;p

anyhow, thanks for the info..

scott

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda » scott-d-o

Posted by Karen Moore on February 2, 2004, at 0:25:06

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on February 1, 2004, at 1:31:33

Hi folks,
Thanks for the in depth discussion here, I'm thinking that I've become a bit of a pharmacology nerd these days, I never thought I'd find these things so amusing and engrossing. But when it looks like there might be some solutions in this morass of information it seems like it might actually be worth spending all of this time trying to figure it all out! If it means there might be a possibility of "taming the beast", why not!
Funny thing is I tried Mirtazapine a few months ago, for exactly some of the reasons you two were debating. But on day three of a very low dose I ended up in the ER on oxygen and a saline drip! Still don't know what the hell that was...
Thanks,
KM

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » scott-d-o

Posted by Karen Moore on February 2, 2004, at 0:40:54

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » katrina1, posted by scott-d-o on January 29, 2004, at 15:01:24

Hey Scott,
Yup, went off the Adderall for a while. That's partially why it took me so long to respond to your note. I was only on 10mg but my brain shuts down so violently it's just amazing (and a bit demoralizing).
As for NMDA antagonists, I'm also curious. I talked to Stephen Dubovsky a few days ago about a variety alternatives and included that in my list(his pets are thyroid hormone and Ca channel blockers). He mentioned using an NMDA antagonist called Memantine, but cautioned me (the bipolar "me") that it might just destabilize me more. Nonetheless, I got the feeling he had atleast some good results with TR patients.
I admit remembering one desperate evening of gulping Robitussin. I remember a vague high, but that was years ago, before I had any clue what bipolar was. Or NMDA antagonists, for that matter! Let me know if you try the gel caps...
KM

 

Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » Karen Moore

Posted by scott-d-o on February 2, 2004, at 22:47:30

In reply to Re: doxepin, remeron, whatever.. thread is off-top » scott-d-o, posted by Karen Moore on February 2, 2004, at 0:40:54

> Hey Scott,
> Yup, went off the Adderall for a while. That's partially why it took me so long to respond to your note. I was only on 10mg but my brain shuts down so violently it's just amazing (and a bit demoralizing).
> As for NMDA antagonists, I'm also curious. I talked to Stephen Dubovsky a few days ago about a variety alternatives and included that in my list(his pets are thyroid hormone and Ca channel blockers). He mentioned using an NMDA antagonist called Memantine, but cautioned me (the bipolar "me") that it might just destabilize me more. Nonetheless, I got the feeling he had atleast some good results with TR patients.
> I admit remembering one desperate evening of gulping Robitussin. I remember a vague high, but that was years ago, before I had any clue what bipolar was. Or NMDA antagonists, for that matter! Let me know if you try the gel caps...
> KM

hey karen,

I did give the gel caps a try, just for fun thou.. I took the whole bottle, which was 300mg; not all that high for a recreational dose. it reminds me most of ketamine ("special k", also a nmda antagonist), due to the same type of mind/body disassociation effect; it's somewhat amusing every once in a while but nothing I'd want to do on a regular basis. Also, it enhances music somewhat, which was the only thing I liked about weed (but could never tolerate it cause of extreme paranoia and panic).. I've only used DXM on one other occasion (syrup) and I much preferred the experience with the gel caps..

It could just be my imagination, but I think my dexedrine did produce a little euphoria the next day (it never usually does.) NMDA antagonists administered by themselves indirectly cause dopamine release so there's no doubt DXM and amphetamine would complement each other well. They come in 15mg gelcaps, I think one per day could do a lot for amphetamine tolerance and if you do a search on this board I think you will find some people have had success using DXM and for this purpose..

however, I don't know exactly how bipolars react to nmda antagonists so perhaps you should look into that before doing any experimenting.. my intuition tells me that, if anything, it would help stabilize you, since most bipolar meds act strikingly similar to DXM in the brain. I wonder why this person thinks memantine could destabilize a bp?

scott

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on February 3, 2004, at 5:02:28

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on February 1, 2004, at 1:31:33

> wow, you must have a lot of time on your hands :-)
>
> keep in mind panda, doxepin is usually prescribed anywhere from 75mg all the way up to a max of 300mg, where as remeron has a *max* dose of 75mg.
>
> according to your data, at the max dose that a pdoc will prescribe, u will get an overall sedative effect that is over 2 times as powerful from the doxepin than the remeron.
>
> so if u have a h1 antagonism fetish, u best go ask your pdoc for doxepin.. ;p
>
> anyhow, thanks for the info..
>
> scott
>

It doesn't work like that. 15mg of Mirtazapine saturates all the H1 receptors, having extra doesn't cause more sedation, the excess then starts to go to the other receptors that it is attracted too such as 5-HT2A, alpha-2 adrenic, etc. That's why it has the wierd effect of becoming more stimulating as you increase the dose.

Cheers,
Panda.

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda

Posted by scott-d-o on February 3, 2004, at 16:52:08

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on February 3, 2004, at 5:02:28

>
> It doesn't work like that. 15mg of Mirtazapine saturates all the H1 receptors, having extra doesn't cause more sedation, the excess then starts to go to the other receptors that it is attracted too such as 5-HT2A, alpha-2 adrenic, etc. That's why it has the wierd effect of becoming more stimulating as you increase the dose.
>
> Cheers,
> Panda.
>

where did u get your info that 15mg of mirtazapine occupies 100% of h1 receptors? I do agree that more stimulation would occur as the dose increases with mirtazapine due to alpha-2 antagonism (not a good kind of stimulation at that.) doxepin however is an alpha-1 antagonist so I would expect the opposite adrenergic response to an increased dose, althou it does block reuptake of NE as well which may balance this somewhat.

scott

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on February 3, 2004, at 23:55:43

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on February 3, 2004, at 16:52:08

> >
> > It doesn't work like that. 15mg of Mirtazapine saturates all the H1 receptors, having extra doesn't cause more sedation, the excess then starts to go to the other receptors that it is attracted too such as 5-HT2A, alpha-2 adrenic, etc. That's why it has the wierd effect of becoming more stimulating as you increase the dose.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Panda.
> >
>
> where did u get your info that 15mg of mirtazapine occupies 100% of h1 receptors? I do agree that more stimulation would occur as the dose increases with mirtazapine due to alpha-2 antagonism (not a good kind of stimulation at that.) doxepin however is an alpha-1 antagonist so I would expect the opposite adrenergic response to an increased dose, althou it does block reuptake of NE as well which may balance this somewhat.
>
> scott
>

>where did u get your info that 15mg of mirtazapine occupies 100% of h1 receptors?

http://www.preskorn.com and http://www.psychotropical.com
Two great websites written by Psychiatrists.

>I do agree that more stimulation would occur as the dose increases with mirtazapine due to alpha-2 antagonism (not a good kind of stimulation at that.)

Norepinephrine Alpha-2 blockade is a good thing, it is believed to give an anti-depressant effect, increase libido & help reverse SSRI induced anorgasmia.

>doxepin however is an alpha-1 antagonist so I would expect the opposite adrenergic response to an increased dose

Norepinephrine Alpha-1 blockade is a bad thing, all the tricyclics do it. It causes Orthostatic Hypotension. One of the biggest difference between Mirtazapine & it's parent Mianserin is most of the A-1 blockade was removed that causes this bad side-effect.


Cheers,
Panda.


 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda

Posted by scott-d-o on February 4, 2004, at 0:48:48

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on February 3, 2004, at 23:55:43

> >where did u get your info that 15mg of mirtazapine occupies 100% of h1 receptors?
>
> http://www.preskorn.com and http://www.psychotropical.com
> Two great websites written by Psychiatrists.

damn, I was hoping for a direct link ;-)

> >I do agree that more stimulation would occur as the dose increases with mirtazapine due to alpha-2 antagonism (not a good kind of stimulation at that.)
>
> Norepinephrine Alpha-2 blockade is a good thing, it is believed to give an anti-depressant effect, increase libido & help reverse SSRI induced anorgasmia.
>

depends on what you mean by "good thing.".. I think the whole idea here is to make the compounds as *selective* as possible, in that regard it is a bad thing.. yes, alpha2 blockade causes catecholamines to be released but in my opinion there are much better ways to achieve the same result. alpha2 antagonists do not act very centrally at all, they act peripherally causing increased adrenaline levels in the blood. if I wanted an antidepressant that worked on DA/NE I would much rather take a selective reuptake inhibitor, MAO-B inhibitor, a psychostimulant or even an antipsychotic at low dose. take a potent alpha-2 antagonist like yohimbine and see how it makes u feel, it's not very fun and I imagine if alpha-2 antagonism was that great then yohimbine would be prescribed as an antidepressant since it's not a very abusable substance..

calling the sexual effects of alpha-2 antagonism a "good thing" is also way too generalized.. good for someone with anorgasmia, but bad for someone with premature ejaculation.. also alpha-2 antagonists are notorious for causing a ton of anxiety.. in fact, they can easily induce panic attack's in people.. that's a bad thing for anyone. btw, alpha2 antagonism can also cause hypertension, just as you state that alpha1 antagonism can cause hypotension.. are you rating these actions at receptors based on what is a good/bad thing for *you*?

> >doxepin however is an alpha-1 antagonist so I would expect the opposite adrenergic response to an increased dose
>
> Norepinephrine Alpha-1 blockade is a bad thing, all the tricyclics do it. It causes Orthostatic Hypotension. One of the biggest difference between Mirtazapine & it's parent Mianserin is most of the A-1 blockade was removed that causes this bad side-effect.
>

never said it was a good or a bad thing.. I was merely stating that it would have the opposite effect on adrenergic receptors than an increased dose of remeron.

scott

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on February 4, 2004, at 1:35:50

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on February 4, 2004, at 0:48:48

> > >where did u get your info that 15mg of mirtazapine occupies 100% of h1 receptors?
> >
> > http://www.preskorn.com and http://www.psychotropical.com
> > Two great websites written by Psychiatrists.
>
> damn, I was hoping for a direct link ;-)
>
> > >I do agree that more stimulation would occur as the dose increases with mirtazapine due to alpha-2 antagonism (not a good kind of stimulation at that.)
> >
> > Norepinephrine Alpha-2 blockade is a good thing, it is believed to give an anti-depressant effect, increase libido & help reverse SSRI induced anorgasmia.
> >
>
> depends on what you mean by "good thing.".. I think the whole idea here is to make the compounds as *selective* as possible, in that regard it is a bad thing.. yes, alpha2 blockade causes catecholamines to be released but in my opinion there are much better ways to achieve the same result. alpha2 antagonists do not act very centrally at all, they act peripherally causing increased adrenaline levels in the blood. if I wanted an antidepressant that worked on DA/NE I would much rather take a selective reuptake inhibitor, MAO-B inhibitor, a psychostimulant or even an antipsychotic at low dose. take a potent alpha-2 antagonist like yohimbine and see how it makes u feel, it's not very fun and I imagine if alpha-2 antagonism was that great then yohimbine would be prescribed as an antidepressant since it's not a very abusable substance..
>
> calling the sexual effects of alpha-2 antagonism a "good thing" is also way too generalized.. good for someone with anorgasmia, but bad for someone with premature ejaculation.. also alpha-2 antagonists are notorious for causing a ton of anxiety.. in fact, they can easily induce panic attack's in people.. that's a bad thing for anyone. btw, alpha2 antagonism can also cause hypertension, just as you state that alpha1 antagonism can cause hypotension.. are you rating these actions at receptors based on what is a good/bad thing for *you*?
>
> > >doxepin however is an alpha-1 antagonist so I would expect the opposite adrenergic response to an increased dose
> >
> > Norepinephrine Alpha-1 blockade is a bad thing, all the tricyclics do it. It causes Orthostatic Hypotension. One of the biggest difference between Mirtazapine & it's parent Mianserin is most of the A-1 blockade was removed that causes this bad side-effect.
> >
>
> never said it was a good or a bad thing.. I was merely stating that it would have the opposite effect on adrenergic receptors than an increased dose of remeron.
>
> scott

Scott,

We are comparing Doxepin to Mirtazapine.
Doxepin blocks A1 receptors, which is bad.
Doxepin blocks A2 receptors, which is I say is good & you say is bad.
Mirtazapine blocks A2 receptors, which is I say is good & you say is bad.
So in this case, Mirtazapine is superior to Doxepin.
If you suffer from premature ejaculation I would say neither drug is good for you.

Cheers,
Panda.

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda

Posted by scott-d-o on February 4, 2004, at 2:30:57

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on February 4, 2004, at 1:35:50

>
> Scott,
>
> We are comparing Doxepin to Mirtazapine.
> Doxepin blocks A1 receptors, which is bad.
> Doxepin blocks A2 receptors, which is I say is good & you say is bad.
> Mirtazapine blocks A2 receptors, which is I say is good & you say is bad.
> So in this case, Mirtazapine is superior to Doxepin.
> If you suffer from premature ejaculation I would say neither drug is good for you.
>
> Cheers,
> Panda.
>

I think you missed my point which was that nothing is inherently bad.. da antagonism: bad for people with parkinson's, good for schizophrenics. The whole point of pharmacology is to correct imbalances and/or dysfunctions in these neurological systems, which occur in different forms for different people..

scott

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o

Posted by Sad Panda on February 4, 2004, at 3:01:37

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » Sad Panda, posted by scott-d-o on February 4, 2004, at 2:30:57

> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > We are comparing Doxepin to Mirtazapine.
> > Doxepin blocks A1 receptors, which is bad.
> > Doxepin blocks A2 receptors, which is I say is good & you say is bad.
> > Mirtazapine blocks A2 receptors, which is I say is good & you say is bad.
> > So in this case, Mirtazapine is superior to Doxepin.
> > If you suffer from premature ejaculation I would say neither drug is good for you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Panda.
> >
>
> I think you missed my point which was that nothing is inherently bad.. da antagonism: bad for people with parkinson's, good for schizophrenics. The whole point of pharmacology is to correct imbalances and/or dysfunctions in these neurological systems, which occur in different forms for different people..
>
> scott

No Scott, you missed your own point. Anything Doxepin can do, Mirtazapine can do better. Neither drug has any dopamine effects, so why are you talking about Parkinson's & Schizophrenia?? Mirtazapine is a mild anti-depressant that can reverse SSRI induced side-effects & give a good nights sleep, Doxepin is similar, but not as good.

Cheers,
Panda.

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine

Posted by Karen Moore on February 4, 2004, at 15:51:11

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on February 4, 2004, at 3:01:37

OK. I've been watching you guys debate this for quite some time now. Reminds me of the arguments I've had with my psychiatrist sister (though yours have been slightly more civil, I think...) It's interesting to watch how two people with different cognitive styles can interprete the same data set and end up on two radically different roads (to enlightenment or befuddlement?!)=?
I will say that philosophically, when discussing meds I think it is important not to take that final step to generalization and judgement as to whether or not one drug is better than another. Though 90% of the time that generalization may be true, all too often there is a subgroup of individuals who fit into the 10% and do better with the "inferior" drug. Since I usually find myself in the 0.05% subgroup I've had to always research "how things work" and dismiss "which one works better". This certainly increases the level of complexity necessary for the given problem, but that's just nature of the beast.

Thanks, your discussions prompted me to finally order the newest edition of my fave pharmacology book at amazon. When it gets here I'll start popping some reminyl and see if I can get some of that concentration/intellect back...

chrs,
KM

P.S. re: Scott << "da antagonism: bad for people with parkinson's, good for schizophrenics. The whole point of pharmacology is to correct imbalances and/or dysfunctions in these neurological systems, which occur in different forms for different people..."
Point well taken. Different drugs, different applications, different successes and problems. For that matter, one person's unbearable side-effect is another's panacea...

 

Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine

Posted by scott-d-o on February 4, 2004, at 16:00:07

In reply to Re: Doxepin v Mirtazapine » scott-d-o, posted by Sad Panda on February 4, 2004, at 3:01:37

> No Scott, you missed your own point. Anything Doxepin can do, Mirtazapine can do better. Neither drug has any dopamine effects, so why are you talking about Parkinson's & Schizophrenia?? Mirtazapine is a mild anti-depressant that can reverse SSRI induced side-effects & give a good nights sleep, Doxepin is similar, but not as good.
>
> Cheers,
> Panda.
>
>

how can you say they are similar when one is a tricyclic that works by blocking reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, and the other works by antagonising postsynaptic serotonin receptors? they are hardly alike at all..

I brought up dopamine antagonism as an *example* of how the same action at a receptor can harm one person and help another.


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.