Posted by Jeff Smith on March 27, 2007, at 14:01:59
In reply to Re: To Cine, posted by one woman cine on March 27, 2007, at 12:05:38
>
> >
> > Hi Cine,
> >
> > -Well, no its not already a done deal.
>
> No, really? Is this another fact? Because I have information that states otherwise. But either way, this thing will just turn into a bigger "who said what". Involving other people just exponentially increases the equation.Hi Cine : )
Yes. Really. This is another fact. So far nobody has requested I send them what Ive offered to so I havent.
After Racer posted the "Please Be Civil" post to me in reply to my post "Learning Lessons From Cine" I replied to her by babble mail and explained exactly why it was that I wrote that post and in my own brief synopsis (with curse words added regarding you) told her about our babblemail conversations.
If she is the reason you say "Because I have information that states otherwise." then youd be partially correct... but only partially correct since I didnt send her our exact bmails... just my brief synopsis.
If she is not the source of your "information that states otherwise" then you would have absolutely no possible way on earth to receive such information.AND: I hereby formally request (and grant permission to) any human being on earth (or elsewhere) to come forth and claim and or show that I ever provided any such information.
> >>>>> -I realize it was private "communication" between two people. But Im offering to share it privately, not publicly. Im sorry if you would prefer that I didnt share them with anyone, but I simply cant understand why you'd feel that way. Could you please explain why so I could understand? Just out of curiosity.
>
> Because if it were OK, everyone could post babbelmails on public boards, but that's prohibited. It's not OK to share private communications. & you are only telling your side, your version.Im not suggesting anyone post babblemails on public boards because I now know thats prohibited:
I am suggesting that if anyone were to babblemail me with their email addy that I will send them what I previously said I would. I dont believe anyone has any juristiction over my email account, therefore I can send whatever I wish to whoever is interested.
But I still dont understand why youd object to anyone reading what you wrote to me. Its OK though, I guess I dont need to understand.I will make a deal with you: If anyone takes me up on that offer Ill let you know (if they give their permission) and you could then tell your side all you'd like. Youre also welcome to tell your side here: Go right ahead.
> >>>> -I too am not going to get into "who said what": I know exactly who said exactly what and can prove it very easily. Just being factual is all.
>
> They are your perceptions, not facts.Well, no. Theyre just the facts plain and simple.
-I have the bmails that were written: Fact.
-I know exactly who said exactly what: Fact.
-I can very easily prove it: Fact.Not only do I have our bmails but I also noticed that each one come with a "fingerprint". Im a pretty computer stupid but I am assuming that these "fingerprints" would be accessable by Dr. Bob if he wished to access them and prove what Im saying is true.
Dr. Bob, are you willing to do this?
> >>>>> -Are you accusing me of "trying to rally people to my point of view"? If so I find that offensive.
>
> I said "I", no where did I say "you". I was speaking about myself. I have no need to have an open invitation to discuss a private matter, between 2 people who have very different ideas about what happened.Oh, OK. Just askin.
> You stated you know the "truth" - have I accused you of calling me a liar? No. I have stated & will continue to state - that is your version of events. Fine. It is in no way my version of events and saying your truth is THE truth feels unfair to me.OK.
> >>>> Im not trying to rally people to my point of view: Im simply offering to share the truthful facts with people and then they can decide for themselves how they feel about it. I dont see anything wrong or immoral about telling the truth and not hiding things and Im sure you'd agree with that. Or no?
>
> Telling your truth is fine, but your truth is not my truth. & btw, - if it's OK to post private things, why not just post who you are IRL, where you live, etc etc. Why not, Jeff?
> Why didn't you include your personal info in the original post? If it's OK to do, then why not post it now?Well thats why I asked for people to read for themselves: To determine the truth for themselves.
And posting who I am IRL (same person I am here minus the last name) my address, etc etc would serve no purpose and then I might get stalked or something weird like that. Same reason nobody posts their real full names, addresses, etc, etc.
Thats "why not", Cine.
> You posted other peoples personal info, including names etc. I wonder how they felt about that.I did? Link please. I assume youre referring to the personal info regarding any shrinks Ive posted about here? If so you could always call them just to ask how they felt about that if youre wondering.
> Everyone has different comfort levels. I am asking you to respect mine. If you don't, you don't. I bear all this in mind when posting in the future.OK. (to the last sentence).
> I would also ask you to please stop posting the smiley faces when writing to me. It's a confusing mixed message. Thanks.Oh, that confuses you? Let me completely clarify. When I post a smilie its just an expression of a smile or bit of happiness, thats all.
Youre welcome : )
ALSO: From your other post to me...
>& it was more than 4 babblemails, Jeff.
>I wish you would find the other ones, including the original.No. It was EXACTLY four babblemails, Cine.
You may wish whatever you'd like, but I do have the original, the subsequent three and there are no "other ones".
poster:Jeff Smith
thread:742135
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20070324/msgs/744683.html