Posted by Larry Hoover on August 19, 2004, at 10:09:33
In reply to Re: NADH » Simus, posted by KaraS on August 18, 2004, at 0:33:42
> > Wow. Almost sounds too good to be true. Sorry to sound ignorant, but would this be in the same family as co-Q10?
> >
> > SimusIgnorance is the normal human condition. Those with initiative rise above it.
Co-Q10 is also known as ubiquinone. It's one of two key chemicals required for your mitochondria to produce ATP, the universal energy source for all the rest of the stuff your body does. The other key chemical is NADH.
Alphalipoic acid helps protect ubiquinone and NADH, too.
> I don't think they're related though the same people would be drawn to them. Enada NADH is very expensive.
It can be expensive, I suppose, but no more than a Starbucks coffee is an expensive thing. CoQ10 and NADH are related, and both are promising for the same group.
> I've also read that it doesn't take long to build a tolerance to it so it's not something you can use everyday (as opposed to co-Q10).
True and true.
> I'm not sure that Larry had that experience with it. I can't remember why he isn't still taking it.
Neither can I. Actually, I did it too frequently (became irritable), and it did make my insomnia worse (diminishing returns).
> Here's another link from Dr. Ray Sahelian. He mentions some case studies of people using it.
>
> http://www.raysahelian.com/nadh.htmlGood link. Covers the bases well.
> I have tried 5 mg. sublingually but didn't have much effect. I think I needed to try more of it and over a period of time. (Then again I'm beginning to think that nothing short of an atomic bomb could get my system moving again.)
>
> -KTake six grams of TMG and see if you still feel that way. ;-)
Lar
poster:Larry Hoover
thread:359642
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20040815/msgs/379410.html