Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Rule of no advocating without telling the risks Lamdage22

Posted by SLS on September 9, 2015, at 7:01:09

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-yukntalwazgetwhtyuwnt, posted by Lamdage22 on September 9, 2015, at 4:40:56

> I wonder why we cant get along on a agree to disagree basis. Pro and anti psychiatry discussions always get emotional and personal.
> I am not as frowned upon as Lou but it goes in the same direction

What consequences might you be promoting by not enumerating the risks of each of your recommendations - including the risks of non-treatment?

Might your recommendations be promoting death?

They could.

Does this sound familiar?

Do you like this kind of accusation? Do you like this kind of responsibility mandated by others for your freedom of speech?

I don't agree with much of what you have to say. However, I do not go out of my way to alert others of your promoting negative consequences without my providing a rationale, citing evidence appearing in medical literature, or challenging you to do so. You do, of course, have no obligation to respond to anything I post to you or about you.

I feel that you have attacked me personally in the past. I didn't like that. Please don't do that anymore.

- Scott

Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.

- George Bernard Shaw




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:SLS thread:1081776