Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Rule of no advocating without telling the risks

Posted by Lamdage22 on September 9, 2015, at 7:37:27

In reply to Re: Rule of no advocating without telling the risks, posted by Lamdage22 on September 9, 2015, at 7:08:19

So you are saying that we CAN get along while disagreeing?

I dont believe the benefits of medication are so well established that you could speak of a "risk of non-treatment". Some studys never make it to the public.. at least thats what i am hearing.

Its a matter of trust. And i dont have it for this profession. You do somehow.

Besides we are only talking about no medical treatment. I would never say anything against a good psychologist. Plus i am not against short term acute medical intervention in severe cases.

I think you get it. And you disagree (at least to some extent) which is fine.

Now i have an appointment.

Schizo-Affective, type depressive
Seroquel 700mg
Zyprexa 12.5mg
Lithium orotate 360mg
Metformin 2000mg
Effexor 37.5mg




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lamdage22 thread:1081776