Posted by SLS on August 29, 2015, at 15:34:54
In reply to Re: Rule of no advocating without telling the risks, posted by Lamdage22 on August 29, 2015, at 14:01:05
> > > So, why cant we warn readers about risks?
> > I don't know. Who is saying that we can't?
Well?
> Why does nobody feel obligated to do so?
Because there is no obligation for anyone to do so. What precedent can you cite that such an obligation exists?
Obviously, there is no obligation for doctors to do so, otherwise they all would. They don't. How do you feel about that? You are on a lot of drugs. Did your doctor inform you about any and all possible adverse events for each drug? If not, have you confronted him with the same vigor as you are confronting the good-hearted people here who are simply making suggestions and relating personal experiences in an effort to provide information?
If you feel that the environment here is deleterious to your health, why not look for one in which all posters are obligated to provide the information regarding any and all adverse events that are possible with each drug mentioned? When you find such a website, it would be a great service to the posting community of Psycho-Babble if you were to provide a URL link to such a site.
Let me know how it goes with your doctors when you confront them. Did your doctor inform you about Nardil and the possibility that it could precipitate psychosis? Do you really expect that people here should be held to a higher standard than what you hold your own doctors to? Why not help out. For each of the drugs you are currently taking, list any and all adverse events that they are each capable of as provided to you by your doctors. Of course, there is no obligation for you to do so, but I would like to see if they missed any.
- ScottSome see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.- George Bernard Shaw
poster:SLS
thread:1081776
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1081876.html