Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Rule of no advocating without telling the risks

Posted by SLS on August 26, 2015, at 16:25:40

In reply to Rule of no advocating without telling the risks, posted by Lamdage22 on August 26, 2015, at 11:27:30

> Dr-Bob,
> what do you think about a rule for this forum to not advocate any drug without mentioning the potential drawbacks?

Suggestions are not necessarily advocations. Among the former, I don't often see the latter.

Who would be responsible for screening posts to determine any and all possible adverse events attendant to the treatment suggestions made by the people who post here?

Q: Who would have that kind of expertise?
A: No one.

Even the best of clinicians would not claim such expertise.

Check out the verbiage to be found at the top of the main pages of these forums as per Dr. Hsiung:

"Don't necessarily believe everything you hear. Your mileage may vary. The only posts I take responsibility for are my own."

The whole Internet is a sociological experiment.

- Scott

Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.

- George Bernard Shaw




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:SLS thread:1081776