Posted by Lou PIlder on July 24, 2016, at 10:35:41
In reply to Lou's response-the quack of psychobabble » SLS, posted by Lou PIlder on July 24, 2016, at 7:25:09
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > I am coming off Cymbalta. ...I'm actually in hospital right now to go off Cymbalta and onto desipramine quickly. Dr. took me off quickly so now I'm into withdrawal hell.
> > >
> > > My biggest concern are these bouts of anxious suicidality that overwhelm me and are totally freaky. I know I'm in a safe place to do this, but it's still just horrible. I'm trying to do this quickly because I have 3 little boys at home and can't afford to be here too long.
> > >
> > > I could use some support...ie, this will get better... right now I think that's what would be helpful. Thanks!
> > > Nickie.
> >
> > You may need to discontinue the desipramine until you are more stable. I was thinking about this in my last posts to you. Desipramine might be making things worse, not better. Clinically (not theoretically), I think it makes sense to discontinue desipramine - even if only briefly - in order to be certain that it is not exacerbating your withdrawal syndrome. If your doctor has already worked with the abrupt cross-over of these two drugs, perhaps he is sure of himself. You can always restart the desipramine at any time. You need to be sure that it is not making the withdrawal symptom worse, extending them in time, or triggering a manic reaction.
> >
> > You will get through this.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Friends,
> Be not deceived. Scott has given medical advice in the form of making a medical claim to suggest that the poster modify the drugging that the doctor has prescribed to the poster here. This goes against the prescribing doctor which could lead to the poster not having confidence in what the doctor is doing to her here. this could lead to her death.
> You see, there is a huge body of evidence to show that modifying these drugs while in treatment could lead to death. Scott, representing himself as some type of authority here, could cause your death. And worse, Mr. Hsiung is allowing him to seriously mislead you to think that what he posts is supportive by him, a psychiatrist that is allowing hate to be seen as being supportive. Do you want to be swayed by the orchestration by Mr. Hsiung allowing Scott to give quasi medical advice here? Does his contradicting the prescribing doctor actually indicate that the doctor is a quack? and then, following that, could also all psychiatrists be quacks? And could not Scott then be determined to be a quack?
> Lou
>
You mothers. Trying so hard to make a more-informed decision as to drug your child or not in collaboration with a psychiatrist. Here, you can see the mish-mash of pseudo-psychopharm charlatans pretending that they know what to do.
Yet today, the psychiatrist here chairing this site does not intervene to warn of the horrific consequences that could come to you by taking the advise of these pretenders here.
You see, thousands of people including children are killed by these drugs each month. And they are killed by taking the drugs as prescribed. What sane person would give these drugs to a human being?
Now the case at hand here is reaching the logical conclusion where the death of the person here could be a result of the influence of posters here all in collaboration with the psychiatrist that chairs this site as for being supportive and educational. But does not he have a duty and responsibility to intercede when quasi medical advise is posted that could lead one to their death? Could not readers see that there is a pretending here? Pretending that those dead from here are still around? You see, Mr. Hsiung allows hatred toward the Jews and me to be posted here with impunity, in particular but not limited to be posted by Scott.
You see, Mr. Hsiung has posted many prohibitions to me here that prevent me from saving lives. Yet what could kill people is allowed to be posted by him. What I could post if the prohibitions were nullified would come from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me. Anti-Semitism means against the Jew. It could also mean against the Jew being allowed to post here from a Jewish perspective when the foundation of hatred toward the Jews is allowed to be posted by Scott and others here. This could lead readers to think that Mr. Hsiung's thinking is that religious discrimination is supportive, and worse, that hatred toward the Jews is supportive by him.
Never again.
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:1090791
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20160713/msgs/1090819.html