Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Can't find disciple docs list

Posted by Phillip Marx on December 30, 1999, at 12:17:36

In reply to Can't find disciple docs list, posted by Morc on December 29, 1999, at 13:24:34

I think the list of endorsing doctors was longer and narrower spectrum on a previous site iteration. Due to feedback, the KISS (keep it simple stupid) balance IS better. He doesn't intend to re-create a NIMH-scale web-document needing a multi-million dollar annual maintenance budget. He's getting a new edition on paper for actual doctors-in-training first. His current edition (190 pages) is for practicing doctors as well as patients.

His site gives his email address ( Ask him for someone local by email if you need to. It would be handy to have your medical “relevants” ready and pre-proof-read for instant email. Every successful doctor has a diagnostic voice stress analyzer (VSA) built into his head, so don’t try to do everything by email. Have you, or can you transcribe or scan in any former HPE (History and Physical Exam)? Interviews are shorter that way. Double-check your work. If you get your reaction history(s) mixed up in your head from sheer volume, look at the actual doctors’ records and freshen your memory. I had to go back to my doctors and get actual copies of all the stuff they did to me since all that stuff did not put me in the most reliable witness category. Avoid restarting totally from scratch unless scratch was really fumbled. He has his own diagnostic decision tree that shortcuts to the chase or else he would probably have an intake questionnaire handy on the net. Actually, I just looked, his decision tree is in his book, 190 pages of just his basics, not reasonable single-sitting net reading. He prescribes no unproven snake-oil medications. He is a better master of the exceptions-to-the-rule than anyone else I've read here will ever hope to be.

I'm studying for a couple of tests and see some statements begging responses that are just going to wait. I don’t care very much at the moment how “baiting” stirring up de”bait” is for mere debate’s sake. I’m glad to read that reason stepped in from several directions. I’m not taking time out to take care of mere “Starved-for-“Attention: Deficit Disorder”” (SADD) either. I know that there isn’t a single treatment cure for SADD, only maintenance therapy. I can and do write better when it is worth it, but it takes longer than I wish to spend with all that I am trying to cram into this week off. I have put together proposals that have won several hundred millions of dollars of research and development, even put together a paper co-presented with IBM that won a national conference top award. Such polish is just not justified here. I understand reduced functionality now and have resolved to learn more philanthropically. I wish to rejoin the race to cross-match and correlate subjective patient dialog with objective instrumentation diagnostics. Insomniacs rejoice, practical sleep diagnosis objectivity is eminent. (bottom of page).

Phillip Marx

> > The web site lists some of his many disciple doctors, are any of them local for you?
> Where's the list, dude?




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Phillip Marx thread:17556