Posted by alexandra_k on November 6, 2018, at 15:35:51
In reply to customer service, posted by alexandra_k on November 6, 2018, at 15:30:32
it is interesting that the UMAT study text says specifically that you should inform people about treatments that might help them, even when their insurance company (for example) is not funding the treatment for them.
i quite agree.
they may decide that the treatment is important enough to them for them to see about how to get the funds together. that is not a call you get to make on their behalf.
i really do not think that this would be considered the ethical stance, in this country, though. i am fairly sure (almost certain) that the sentiment would be that it would be cruel to inform people about things they cannot have.
they cannot have
they cannot have
that's what it is to be doctor - see? to make those calls.
say the people who got spat back out. sigh.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:1101870
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20181103/msgs/1101871.html