Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Moral dilemma » special_k

Posted by LegWarmers on March 22, 2006, at 6:49:18

In reply to Re: Moral dilemma, posted by special_k on March 21, 2006, at 21:29:35

> Though if he really does have a duty to his wife then maybe he does have a duty to steal the drug. Given that the harm to his wife is greater than the harm to the shopkeeper he probably does have a duty to steal the drug (so I ammend my previous answer)
>
> If I remember the case rightly... The drug cost $1,000 to make... I think he should have left the $1,000 on the bench as he left.
>
> That way the only thing he is hurting (re the shopkeeper) is his sense of entitlement...
>
> (and tresspass on his property...)
>
> (and maybe it took him some time and effort (which should be compensated))
>
> i'm tempted to say the shopkeeper should be punished...
> But i'm not sure whether that is coming from anger or moral reasoning ;-)

The idea is.. that at the highest stage of morality, stage 6. A person makes the call that life has more value than the druggest's drugs. We have a duty to prevent death .....
I think the druggest should be punished too! Its just evil IMO
Its too early for me atm, so I hope I worded this right

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:LegWarmers thread:623115
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20060318/msgs/623263.html