Posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2015, at 8:11:11
In reply to Discussion of justice » Lou Pilder, posted by ed_uk2010 on January 25, 2015, at 17:29:55
> >The *scene* that the poster is referring to is in the second temple and is about Jews that could spread anti-Semitic propaganda of as moneychangers
>
> Jay was posting on a positive theme, about justice.
>
> >If my requests were responded to...
>
> If your requests were responded to, you would reply, accordingly, with yet more requests for clarification.
>
> >mislead them to accept that Mr. Hsiung is doing what in his thinking is fair and will be good for this community as a whole
>
> This is a mental health forum, Lou. No one has expressed any hatred for Jews. In fact, I doubt anyone here is even thinking about Jews apart from yourself.
>
Ed,
You wrote,[...This is a mental health forum...No one has expressed any hatred toward Jews..I doubt anyone here is even thinking about Jews...].
A question concerning what you have written here could be is if anti-Semitic propaganda is posted here, does that express hatred toward the Jews? And parallel in that respect, does that anti-Semitic propaganda posted here that can be seen as supportive, and will be in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, will be good for this community as a whole for the anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen as supportive, even though anti-Semitism is against Mr. Hsiung's rules here, does that action by Mr. Hsiung constitute a foundation for a subset of readers to think that this site fosters anti Jewish feelings as being supportive that could create and develop hatred toward the Jews?
Many of you already know that I am trying to stop Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record and all those here that could be in concert with Mr. Hsiung and those deputies from allowing anti-Semitic propaganda to be seen here as supportive and will in Mr. Hsiung's thinking be good for this community as a whole by in my discussion with him to post repudiations to antisemitic propaganda here that can be seen un sanctioned.
You write, Ed, that [... No one has expressed any hatred for Jews here...]. But could not a subset of readers that see anti-Semitic propaganda here being posted with impunity by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record be taken by those readers to be considered that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record are validating the anti-Semitic propaganda as that there is good in it to be seen as supportive? And if so, could that stoke the furnace of hatred toward the Jews to readers outside of the posting members here?
You see, when a psychiatrist has a rule to not post what could put down or accuse, or to not post what could lead someone to feel that their faith is being put down, and then goes ahead and allows anti-Semitic propaganda to be posted with impunity anyway, that could IMHHHO persuade others to think that Jews are inferior people and along with [...No non Christian will...], which is analogous to [...No Jew will...] and worse, that all those that have in their faith that they can enter heaven without being a Christian could feel insulted by the statement allowed to be seen as civil where it is originally posted, those people could be seen as being inferior to Christians which insults those faiths also. A subset of readers could be un informed here by the nature of the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung that prevents me from posting my response to the anti-Semitic propaganda here to be seen as supportive. And it is so easy to persuade the un informed. It's so easy.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1075295
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1075896.html