Posted by Lou Pilder on July 5, 2014, at 9:44:38
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-opper » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on July 3, 2014, at 12:05:45
> > Scott,
> > You wrote,[...you have never accused Dinah of fostering anti-Semitism...reassure her of this...].
> > I have offered her the opportunity to post a link to any post that she thinks accuses her of fostering anti-Semitism so that in dialog, the facts could be known. If she rejects that opportunity, then that could speak for itself.
> > Lou
>
> Perhaps what it is saying is that I have no particular reason to believe in your good faith in requesting the information. After all, it seemed doubtful that you have forgotten so many of your posts made within the last month, when you seem to remember posts made years and years ago.
>
> And whatever microscopic doubt I may have had has been shattered by your reply to Scott.D,
You wrote,[...whatever microscopic doubt I may have had has been shattered by your reply to Scott...]
I am unsure as to what you would want readers to believe by what you wrote about me here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. What in my reply to Scott shattered, and what was shattered?
B. What could be one post that I have made recently that you say that I could have forgotten and could be relevant to this discussion?
C. What is the significance, if anything, of that you have no particular reason to believe in my good faith in requesting the information?
D. True or False:
D1. If I was to post a link here, Lou, to a post that I think that you are accusing me of fostering anti-Semitism, then you could have the opportunity to post your side of that claim by me, Lou
D2. Anti-Semitism can be fostered in this community when the leaders and their deputies all allow statements that could lead a Jewish reader to feel that their faith is being put down by the statement.
D3. I did have the option of sanctioning the posts in question, Lou, but I chose not to do so and all the other deputies of record had a discussion with me and we all agreed to allow those anti-Semitic statements to stand.
D4. I will not post a repudiation to the anti-Semitic statements here that do not have a tag-line to please be civil where they are originally posted because I agree that they should be allowed to stand so that readers could think that anti-Semitism is supportive here and that the tragic consequences that could happen to Jews by that hatred toward the Jews could be seen as being good for this community as a whole because those readers could know the TOS here where Mr. Hsiung says that people are to try to trust him at what he does because he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole, trumps his own rules not to post anything that could lead one to feel that their faith is being put down
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1067704
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067932.html