Posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2014, at 9:48:54
In reply to Re: I just have to take it » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on July 3, 2014, at 9:18:47
> > Being at Babble makes Dinah stronger.
>
> That is quite an assumption to make. Do you have any evidence to back you up? Do you know that when I have been at Babble lately, my thinking becomes so disorganized from stress that I find work difficult for days at a time? Do you think it makes me stronger to have to take anti-psychotics to calm me down enough to function after reading Babble?
>
> It's fine for you to say that I should learn not to get so upset. If I feel part of this community, if I even *take* part in this community, I get upset. My only shot at not being harmed by this community as it is currently run by you is to stay away. I can't afford to have my work suffer. I can't allow my family to ask me on and off all day what's wrong? Am I ok?
>
> You seem to be able to remember for some people that this is a mental health community. But to find it difficult to remember for others.
>
> Please be more sensitive to the fact that for some people your current way of running Babble can be harmful, and not make them stronger at all.D,
You wrote,[...your ..way of running Babble can be harmful...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting readers to think by that. This is all because your *way* is not defined and your *harmful* don't have examples.
If you could post answers to the following, then readers could know what the way is and wat the harm is.
True or False:
A. The harm is what could befall Jews as a result of antiemetic statements being allowed to be seen as civil here in the post where they are posted originally.
B. The harm is the emotional /psychological harm from the infliction of emotional distress by allowing libel against you Lou, to stand un repudiated in the post where it is originally made.
C. The harm is the humiliation that Jews and Islamic people and other non-Christians could have inflicted upon them by the fact that their faith is degraded by that the statement {No non-Christian will enter heaven} is allowed to be seen here un repudiated in the post where it is originally posted, by the fact that there is not a post linked to it by Mr. Hsiung or one of his deputies of record then to the post where it is originally made to state that the statement could lead those of other faiths to think that their faith is being degraded and that their faith is being allowed by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record to be put down.
D. Readers could be harmed by the fact that Mr Hsiung says that he can allow members to defame another here by putting them down or accusing them, if in his thinking the community will benefit by allowing the defamation so that in his thinking, it will be good for this community as a whole to allow him to disregard his own rules.
E. The way that the site is run, by Mr. Hsiung having a provision for notifications to be responded to members, but that he gives himself the option to respond to yours, Lou, or not, is discriminatory and could lead to harm inflicted upon you, Lou, as discrimination is an abuse of power.
F. more of your choice
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1067704
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067850.html