Posted by Lou Pilder on November 10, 2011, at 5:51:50
In reply to Lou's reply- » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on November 10, 2011, at 5:21:36
> > Sorry. I forgot to post the link.
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7889.html
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott,
> As can be seen, the statement by Mr. Hsiung at the end of what is in the link states that the purpose of the forum is for support and if something is not supportive they can take it elseware, (not here). And also the fact that it is in the bible does not make it supportive.
> That is the crux of this matter in question. I am requesting for Mr. Hsiung to post in the thread in question as to if he considers the statement in question that purports that there is a set of people that have eternal life and forgivness by the {only way}. That way is described as (redacted by respondent)Jesus. That precludes all others since the poster uses the word,{only}.
> It has been well-established in the rules here that statements that could lead people to think that there is what is referred to as {the only way}, to not be supportive. This is why I am asking members here to ppst from their perspective in the thread in question.
> Here is a post that exemplifies this rule here.
> Lou
> To see this post:
> A. Go to the search box at the bottom of the page here
> B. Type in:
> [admin, 6531]Scott,
The crux of this matter is as to if Mr. Hsiung considers the statement in question supportive or not. And if he considers it to be not supportive, then what is his rationale for allowing the statement to be {OK}? And thn what does {OK} mean here?
You see, it has been well-established that Jews and others that do not acceopt the claim in queastion are not in the set of people that the statement in question identifiies.
Then my concern is also as to why are not the members here, in mass, protesting the allowing of the statement in question by Mr. Hsiung by posting in the thread in question.
Here is another link that brings out the crux of this situation. And is it in question to some here as to if the statement in question is supportive or not?
Lou
To see this post:
A. Go to the search box at the bottom of the page
B. Type in:
[faith, 453471]
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1000678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1002088.html