Posted by Lou Pilder on November 19, 2011, at 9:34:11
In reply to Re: anyone » Lou Pilder, posted by hyperfocus on November 18, 2011, at 0:05:50
> >You wrote,[...the situation is not favorable to anyone...].
> >Would you be willing to explain here what you are wanting to mean by that? If you could, then I could have the opportunity to >respond accordingly.
> I mean that if every post turns into one contentious issue then all of us, yourself included, lose the opportunity to interact and learn things from each other. You have a lot of knowledge on faith and religion and I've learned things from you I never considered. It's just focusing on the same issue repeatedly seems to limit your interaction with other posters, and it's a very small number of posters on that board. All of us need your voice to be heard on other matters.
> I've made a post about some views I have on this issue and I'd be glad if you could read it and tell me your opinion: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20101230/msgs/1002966.html
You wrote,[...I've learned things from you...All of us need your voice to be heard...].
There could be other issues here that could be unbeknownst to you.
I am prohibited from posting the foundation of Judaism here as reveled to me. This limits my voice while the foundation of some Christindom sects is allowed to be posted here which states that the 1 1/2 million Jewish children that were murderd by antisemites between the years 1933 and 1945 can not have eternal life or forgivness because the statement that is allowed to stand here states that the only (redacted by respondent)Jesus , which Jewish children reject because they are Jews that do not accept the claim in question. As well as those Jewish children not being allowed forgivness or eternal life as the statement in question purports, could not those of other faiths and athiests and agnostics that reject the claim in question also be excluded as well?
Here is a way to see what Mr. Hsiung will do to me if I posted the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me. If you could bring that post up and read it, I think that it could go a long way for understanding of this situation where the owner/operator of this site allows (redacted by respondent), while posting to the Jewish member (redacted by respondent), which has historical parallels that I am also prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting here.
To see this post:
A. Go to the search box at the bottom of this page.
AB. Type in:
[Re: please be, admin, 7968]
There could be many posts that come up. This one was posted on Oct 28, 2002