Posted by Lou Pilder on August 9, 2008, at 16:54:51
In reply to Re: please be civil, posted by Dena on August 9, 2008, at 15:07:34
> > > the Jews killed Christ
> >
> > Please don't post anything that could lead others (such as Jews) to feel accused. Even if you're paraphrasing someone else.
> >
> > But please don't take this personally, either, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person.
> >
> > If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please first see the FAQ:
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforce
> >
> > Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bob
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> This is ridiculous and insulting.
>
> Everyone knows that Lou, of all people, would not be promoting anything anti-Semitic.
>
> To sanction him for merely pointing out what *would be* anti-Semitic language, and to let other things remain, which do lead others to feel put down, is beyond-absurd.
>
> Yes, I'm bringing up old stuff. But because it's left here as seemingly condoned, it sets a precedent for others to follow suit. And, it's incredibly, obviously, blatantly partial.
>
> Why are these allowed to remain, while Lou is ridiculously sanctioned?:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20080404/msgs/832658.html (re: Christianity is the only religion that brings people to God.)
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20051105/msgs/612282.html (re: no non-Christian will enter heaven.)
>
> Why are those left intact, unsanctioned?
>
> Why do entire conversations, which show gross partiality, suddenly evaporate?
>
> Why does it appear that some religious expressions are endorsed here, while others are regularly sanctioned?
>
> Why do the rules not apply equitably, to all here?
>
> And why do I doubt this post will be taken seriously, or even answered?
>
> Shalom, DenaFriends,
Dena has posted a link to a post, it is the first of the two links offered here.
There is an offered link by the poster there that has Matt27 in the link.
If you click on that link, you bring up the 27th chapter of the christiandom bible of the book called Matthew.
In that link, you can see what I am refering to by reading verse 1 and then verse 25 and then the whole chapter.
Those verses were even redacted by Mel Gibson in his film. These verses are continually causing me deep emotional distress even though I have requested over and over not to post such, for they remind me of the horrors of Nazism and that 1 1/2 million Jewish children were murdered with that ideology put in the minds of the murderers and the people that supported them.
I thank Zeba and Dena and others that posted as to what can be seen and I think that it will be good for the community as a whole for others that know what can be seen to post here also.
Best wishes,
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:680571
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/845202.html