Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply to Sigismund-dlbindf? Sigismund

Posted by Lou Pilder on May 13, 2008, at 16:44:02

In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Sigismund-dsngnuos? Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on May 13, 2008, at 16:30:48

> >You wrote that[...they have to respond to a ruling that is defensible....]. I ask as to if there could be a ruling that is not defensible?
> Well, yes, IMO.
> >If so, what in your opinion could that mean if there was a response that was not defensible?
> You wrote,[...they have to pretend that there is more logic to it than there actually is...]. Could you post here what authority you could use to say that?
> No authority Lou. It just popped into my head.
> >For if one has to pretend something, then could that mean to you that a false assertion could be made as an answer to the request for criteria/rationales/clarification? If so, why?
> I can't see why not.
> >For could not a reply be the honest criteria/rationale/clarification?
> Yes, it could be.

What concerns me here is the phrase,[...they >have to<...and they have to >pretend<...].
After reading your reply and what you wrote, could you post here your opinion as to why there has not been a reply to me with the criteria/rationale, and clarification that I have requested? If you could, then I could have a better understanding of what you wrote and be better able to respond accordingly.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:808496