Posted by Lou Pilder on March 31, 2008, at 7:25:36
In reply to Lou's reply to Robert Hsiung-urchtnhrt, posted by Lou Pilder on January 26, 2008, at 11:06:33
> > > > a. Can I post here the relationship of the Rockefeller foundation with I. G. Farben in relation to neurotransmitters and Nazi doctors?
> > >
> > > I think it might be conducive to civic harmony if you don't post anything about Nazis, thanks.
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > You wrote,[...(I think) that it {>might be< conducive to civic harmony} if you don't post |anything| about Nazis...].
> > The grammatical structure of your statement here, as a reply from you to me, has a generally accepted meaning that a {probability} is being brought into the discussion as your use of {it >might< be}. For if it {might be}, then there is also the potential that it might >not be<. This could be determined by various methods as to if it could or could not be .
> > If something [{might be} conducive to civic harmony if I or others don't post about something], then could it not also have the potential to be something that {could be} conducive to civic harmony here?
> > You wrote that it is your {thinking} that it might be conducive to civic harmony if I don't post >anything< about Nazis. I am interested in what it is in your thinking that you have used to post here that it would be conducive to civic harmony if I don't post {anything} >about< Nazis. If you could post here what it is in your thinking that you used to post here your reply to me, then I could have the opportunity to know what it is in your thinking and post my reply to you here about your thinking. I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here as to the grammatical use here of the word {anything}, about Nazis. Does not the word, {anything} have the potential to mean an absolute prohibition as to mean {at all}? If that is the meaning that you are wanting to have others here perceive as the way you are wanting the word {anything} to be meant, how, in your thinking, could that be conducive to civic harmony here if it is an absolute and the forum has a mission for members to offer education and support? If that subject can not be posted about here, what other subjects could, in your thinking, be those that if they are not posted about, will be conducive to civic harmony?
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In regards to your reply to me here,[...if you don't post anything {about} Nazis...]. The grammatical structure of your reply has the generally accepted meaning that the word {about} means {concerning}.
> My question to you was,[...can I post here the relationship of the Rockefeller foundation...{in relation to neurotransmitters}...]. The subject in question concerns {neurotrnasmitters} and the forum concerns neurotransmitters.
> The subject of neurotransmitters is about also the use of neuroleptic drugs. There is a wealth of eductional material that I would like to share here concerning those chemicals called neuroleptics and could involve aspects IMO that could be supportive and/or educational to some here. This infomation could give those considering taking nuroleptic drugs IMO a better understanding of the effects that could be to them if they were to take them. This type of educational material is IMO helpfull for others to make a decision concerning the use or non-use of neuroleptic drugs.
> How neuroleptic drugs act upon one's nervous system could IMO be important here in the forum's mission of support and education. The way neurotransmitters are discovered and what the uses of neuroleptic agents were before they were used as psychotropic drugs could IMO give light to some in their understanding of the effects upon thier nervous systems and perhaps their entire life ahead. The chemical actions and their consequences IMO are part of what I think others could use to make their own determination as to if they are wanting to use drugs that act upon their neurons and systems related to them.
> Research from historical documments can be conducive in my thinking to have an educational and IMO a supportive atmosphere here that could be conducive to civic harmony. One could post the word {trigger} in the subject heading for those that could not feel harmonious if they were to read about historical aspects of neurotrsnmitters that could involve a particular historical political system and the relationship with neurotrnasmitters by the use of drugs that effect one's neurons and the effects on their life from those chemicals put into their bodies.
> Lou PIlderMr. Hsiung,
In regards to your reminder procedure and writing that if one wants to know your rationale or to discuss actions that you take or to discuss your rules and policy here, the above posts from me to you here have concerns of mine that I would like to know from you and if I knew them, then I could have the opportunity to respond to your rationale(s) accordingly.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:808496
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/820850.html