Posted by Lou Pilder on February 13, 2012, at 21:28:01
In reply to Lou's reply-, posted by Lou Pilder on February 13, 2012, at 21:06:12
> > > > Only l left in three post rule. Phillipa
> > >
> > > Phillipa,
> > > You wrote the above....cute
> > > Lou
> >
> > Friends,
> > I intended to develop this exposition to its logical conclusion which my intent was to give you information which one could use in making a decision as to take the drug in question or not.
> > Now Mr. Hsiung has made a very broad prohibition to me here that (redacted by respondent) conclusion of mine.
> > Be advised that I had posted a response to Mr. Hsiung in this thread and it now is on the administrative board. If you could go there, and post there, I then could have the opportunity to post my response to you there.
> > Lou
> >
>
> Friends,
> The drug in question is not one that I have previous mentioned.
> I now want to give facts about opiates. Opiates come from 2 poppy plants that include morphine, codiene and thebaine. Then there are semi-synthetic opiates such as herione, oxycodone and such.
> Then there are pure synthetic opiates called opioides. These are usually similar to codiene. But they have a greater addiction/withdrawal syndrome that has more features such as siezures.
> more to come...
> LouFriends,
Now the chemical nature of synthetic opiates, opioides, predates the advent of Effexor/Pristiq by a long time. The chemical structure of an old opioid is as follows without the numbers:
[dimethylamino, methylphenyl, cyclohexanol]
cyclohexanol is hydrogenated {phenol}.
Now let us look at the structure of Effexor
[dimethylamino, methoxyphenyl, ethyl,cyclohexanol]
You see, Effexor is a new name for a knock-off of an old drug.
Now here is the chemical structure of Pristiq
[dimethylamino, hydroxycyclohexylethyl phenol]
Now here is the chemical structure for TRAMADOL
dimethylamino, methoxyphenyl,cyclohexanol]
QED
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1009503
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120212/msgs/1010177.html