Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph » Lou Pilder

Posted by larryhoover on January 1, 2012, at 15:45:55

In reply to Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph, posted by Lou Pilder on January 1, 2012, at 13:49:42

> The response that was in the above post by me was redacted by me.
> Lou
What is the point, Lou? You redact (delete) all text that you authored, but then post anyway. And afterwards, you post to say that you said nothing because you deleted your own words.
I would argue that your editing is not even redaction, as there is no previously posted text being selected from, but let's just stick to the main question here.
What is the point? What are you trying (and utterly failing) to communicate?
Lar

Thread

Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope Phillipa 1/1/12
Lou's response-grehytgolph » Phillipa Lou Pilder 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph Lou Pilder 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope torrid2 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope SLS 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph » Lou Pilder larryhoover 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph sigismund 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope » Phillipa sigismund 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope » sigismund sigismund 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope » sigismund SLS 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph JohnLA 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph Phillipa 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope » SLS sigismund 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph » Phillipa sigismund 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph » sigismund Phillipa 1/1/12
Re: Lou's response-grehytgolph » Phillipa sigismund 1/1/12
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope Christ_empowered 1/1/12
Lou's response-playnlhevzabul Lou Pilder 1/1/12
...
Re: Blowing Things Out Of Proportion I Hope » creepy Phillipa 1/3/12

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:larryhoover thread:1006073
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20111226/msgs/1006083.html

	for
in