Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: What dose or Nardil needed to kick in? » girlnterrupted78

Posted by gardenergirl on June 25, 2007, at 1:59:27

In reply to Re: What dose or Nardil needed to kick in? » Phillipa, posted by girlnterrupted78 on June 24, 2007, at 23:21:32

>
>
> Google? Why do you advise me to go to google?

My guess it's because it's a good start for a search on Nardil.

> I have already googled Nardil.

And Phillipa knew that how?

> Why is google superior to psycho-babble?

Who said anything about one being better than the other?

> Are you discouraging me from posting here?

Not from what I can see. I see a caring poster offering suggestions for other avenues and resources for obtaining the information you are seeking. I don't see her saying not to post here or that you won't find what you need here. In fact, Phillipa often goes out of her way to post to new folks who's threads aren't getting a response, just to make sure they feel welcome and to offer help. That behavior contrasts dramatically with your impression of what she's saying to you.

> Every single reply I got was helpful, except for yours. I'm sorry. Like I said, this is not meant to be a mean post towards you. Just an explanation: what I am looking for at psycho-babble is experienced people who have been on Nardil. You've never been on Nardil, so you can't provide any kind of feedback on this. Nothing at all. So why not let it go and participate in threads where you have more experience?

Another suggestion would be for you to not read any posts from Phillipa if you feel they would not be likely to meet your requirements. Phillipa also has freedom to post when and where she likes. This solution does not infringe on her freedom, nor yours, as you can choose what to read or not read.
>
> Your only feedback is for me to leave this forums

Where does she say that???

> and go to google or ask my doctor.

Pretty standard suggestions from a wide variety of Babblers.

> Why can't you allow me to interact with people here?

Allow? Allow???? I can't imagine how Phillipa could possibly have the power to allow or disallow your posting here. I'm sorry, I don't follow your reasoning to this conclusion at all.

> So please respect my right to participate in this forum and to talk to people who have been on Nardil.

I haven't seen anyone preventing you from participating here. I haven't seen any evidence of your rights being trampled on, either. Again, I can't follow your reasoning to this conclusion.

> Whether I call my doctor or not, that's really my business. I think you should just let me be and allow me to interact with members of this forum who know about Nardil. Thanks.

Again, allow? Let you be? Phillipa making a post on your thread somehow prevents you from participating and interacting with others? Is she in some way interfering with your ability to interact with the select others you wish to interact with? I'm scratching my head lost at this one.

One of the primary rules of thumb here is to take what you need and leave the rest, because there is a wide variety of information available. Some good. Some bad. Some dangerous. Some ehhh, okay for you but not for me. Add to that the author, and it's a crap shoot a lot of the time. Expecting every post to you to be of a certain quality and from a certain type of poster seems like it would be just setting yourself up for disappointment.

gg, Nardil user last four years

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:gardenergirl thread:765304
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20070622/msgs/765569.html