Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Statistical question on SSRIs » SLS

Posted by Squiggles on May 8, 2006, at 12:41:32

In reply to Re: Statistical question on SSRIs, posted by SLS on May 8, 2006, at 11:13:33

> Regarding reboxetine:
>
> > > A few people have responded favorably to it, but it seems that many more have not.
>
> > You probably have access to data on this.
>
> I most certainly do not.
>
> I doubt you will find any "data" other than that which is anecdotal. I believe you can get a better idea of the experiences of people who have posted here over the years by perusing the archives. That's about all I can offer you. Sorry.
>
> I might suggest that not everything that looks good on paper as we feebly try to understand it translates into real world clinical outcomes. Reboxetine might be selective as we have come to define it, but that does not make it any more useful than desipramine. From what I have seen here on psychobabble, it seems to be less useful.
>
>
> - Scott


Yes, i am looking at the posts here - thank
you. I have always considered testimonials
to be a good source of feedback - given
that there are enough of them to get a
general picture. It is odd, that the
drug is no longer available though -- i wonder
where these people got it a few years ago,
and if it was pulled off the market for some
undisclosed reasons. Nobody here has any
horror stories about it.

Squiggles


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Squiggles thread:640557
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060504/msgs/641364.html