Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Older drugs vs. newer drugs... » Jumpy

Posted by Ritch on January 21, 2003, at 0:05:29

In reply to Re: Older drugs vs. newer drugs... » Ritch, posted by Jumpy on January 20, 2003, at 21:41:37

> > Jay, the TCA's are can be dangerous in overdose and do cause cardiac conduction problems in quite a few people (at higher doses). The number one thing I don't like about TCA's is the orthostatic hypotension. I even got that with Remeron and it was the number #2 side effect (besides duhhness) that I didn't like about the Remeron. Nortriptyline was the easiest in that regard, and nort. is probably the only TCA I would ever retry.
>
> I though imipramine's side effects were similar to nortriptyline's. In the test tube, imipramine might have more affinately for receptors causing certain side effects. But in vivo, people have a good amount of the imipramine converted to desipramine, which for many has less side effects than nortri.
>
> J
>

I had an *excellent* anti-ADD response with taking low-dose desipramine, but had *much* more blurred vision, tachycardia, and dizziness, that nortiptyline didn't cause, but I needed to take something else with the NT to get the anti-ADD response as robust as with desip. (in my case low-dose Zoloft).


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Ritch thread:136591
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030119/msgs/136829.html