Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Progesterone and Depression » shelliR

Posted by Lorraine on June 28, 2001, at 10:19:09

In reply to Re: Progesterone and Depression » Zo, posted by shelliR on June 28, 2001, at 9:35:33

> > My worst, killer depressions were on oral contraceptives.. .from the progesterone. Which I now take as micronized progesterone, and tolerate just fine. My understanding was that progesterone is the primary depressive prob. with o.c.s. . and PMS. .
> >
> > I get a tiny hit from yr post that you're anti-estrogen? No? There *are* better forms than Premarin. . .
>
> Hi Zo. No, I'm not anti-estrogen. Just very confused about it. The reason I felt that I needed to quote what was said was because of my situation. That is, no one would automatically suggest estrogen to me now, because I am symptom free in regard to perimenapausal symptoms. (No hot flashes, sweats.) But my depression has definitely been on the rise in the past year.
>
> What I hadn't understood from your post was that everyone in the study had perimenapausal symptoms. From your post I thought all women, 45 and over and depressed should be given estrogen as a first line antidepressant. Anyway, I was just trying to put everything on the table, I wasn't trying to criticize you. Again, I am grateful for the citation.
>
>
> I am confused also about the estrogen-progesterone balance, since progesterone (natural, in suppository form) helps me so much with my premenstrual physical symptoms. I have a really good gyn; I think a trip to her is way overdue.
>
> Also because my sister had breast cancer , that puts me in a higher risk category. So the benefits of ERT have to outweigh the risks. So there are two questions: (1) would ERT help my depression and; (2) How high are the risks involved?
>
> Thanks again for starting this thread; it's really good to be able to have a discussion about it.
>
> Shelli

when i was placed on estrogen, it was estratest until I stabilized (yet to happen, but maybe in this lifetime) because of the depressant effect of progesterone. they do not recommend this, however, because of the risk of uterine cancer so I have an ultrasound every 6 months to check things out.

Shelli--the risk of breast cancer is ambiguous. Studies have gone both ways, with some showing a lower risk (one hypothesis is that the women are more careful checking themselves?). Anyway, a big study is now underway to determine this but by the time we have results, your decision window will have closed. Most of what I have read (I have breast cancer in my family too) is that the risk increases after 5 years of use. Anyway, remember too the decreased risk of heart disease, osteoporosis, and alzheimers. (I will say the skin does improve considerably as a side benefit as does sexual lubrication.) You might try it and see if it works. If it does, then you might consider switching to a natural form after a spell--these forms are supposed to be associated with less risk.


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Lorraine thread:67708
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010625/msgs/68229.html