Posted by Anna P. on May 4, 2000, at 13:28:32
In reply to Re: Short trials and moclobemide, Fred Potter, posted by JohnL on May 4, 2000, at 0:53:39
> > I took Moclobemide when I was very ill and it started to work on day 2 and definitely worked by day 3. The right drug for me therefore? Not so. It gradually flattened and dipped and my dose was put up finally to 600mg and I proceeded to get worse and worse until they changed it for Paxil, which did nothing for about 3 weeks. I had one day of feeling great and then the poop-out started. > Fred
>
> The phenomenon you mention--quick response which then fades or worsens--is a clue indicative of instable chemistry or instable electricity. This phenomenon is clearly identified and discussed in a book I was reading. Not just a case of chemical imbalance. And this of course warrants a whole new approach in drug selection priorities.John L., I didn't read the book. What does "unstable chemistry or electricity" mean"?
My response to moclobemide was within 3-7 days, then I lost the response despite dose increase up to
900 mg.
The augmentation effect was only temporary.Anna P.
poster:Anna P.
thread:31396
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000429/msgs/32265.html