Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Reboxetine

Posted by Adam on October 29, 1999, at 13:19:16

In reply to Reboxetine, posted by Luke on October 28, 1999, at 12:30:26

This talk about sexual dysfunction has me worried...

I have had only brief trials on TCAs like imipramine and desipramine
(and clomipramine, now that I think about it). I found them all nearly
intolerable. Physical misery in a pill. The side effect of these drugs
I found most distressing was almost complete sexual dysfunction. I mean
NO ability to even get close to an orgasm and barely enough response to
produce a disapointing state of turgidity.

That this could be a function of elevated NE hadn't occurred to me.
Given all the theories out there, there's no reason to think it would,
but I prefer firsthand accounts over cute and unproven mechanistics.
Using rebox. as an augmentation was something I was very much
looking forward to trying.

> I have been taking reboxetine (Edronax) for depression for about a week. I am noticing positive effects, especially in relation to increased energy. However, despite the manufacturer's claim that reboxetine causes much less sexual dysfunction than SSRIs, I am totally impotent while on the drug. The manufacturer also claims side effects diminish after a few weeks, but I would rather hear that from someone who has actually taken the drug.
> Does anyone have any experience with reboxetine?


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Adam thread:14098
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/19991108/msgs/14160.html