![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 8 of 8. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 25, 2007, at 8:48:38
Dr. Hsiung and his deputies,
My request here is that I would like to post my response to posts that are now in the archives and I do not know how to repost the thread here so that I could post my response to what the original requests are that I have been requested to link to and would like for those original requests to be reposted here.
Your reply to me that you are trying to reply to my original request(s) could mean that there are numerous requests involved that you would like for me to link to. These original requests could be from years ago and I am unsure as to which ones you are trying to reply to me about.
I am requesting that the ones that you are trying to reply to me about be reposted here in descending order.
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070304/msgs/749465.html
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 6, 2007, at 9:47:02
In reply to Lou's reminder to Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on April 25, 2007, at 8:48:38
> I am requesting that the ones that you are trying to reply to me about be reposted here in descending order.
Sorry, what I meant was, if you'd like to remind me about a request of yours, could you post a link to the original request and not a link to an earlier reminder or a copy of the request? Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 8, 2007, at 7:40:44
In reply to Re: Lou's reminder, posted by Dr. Bob on July 6, 2007, at 9:47:02
> > I am requesting that the ones that you are trying to reply to me about be reposted here in descending order.
>
> Sorry, what I meant was, if you'd like to remind me about a request of yours, could you post a link to the original request and not a link to an earlier reminder or a copy of the request? Thanks,
>
> BobDR. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...could you post a >link<...?]
Actually, sometimes no. This is because I am unsure as to what your new rules that were made when I rejoined the forum could mean in regards to posting past posts and my request could be contained in a post that has my request that I do not know how I can separate it from the other post and I would like to discuss {the actions that we take}in regards to the post having the potential, like the one match to cause a forest fire, IMO to lead a Jew to feel put down. If anyone would like to know of the post in question, they could email me if they like.
Lou Pilder
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 10, 2007, at 13:35:39
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung-forstfir » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on July 8, 2007, at 7:40:44
> > could you post a link to the original request
>
> Actually, sometimes no. This is because I am unsure as to what your new rules that were made when I rejoined the forum could mean in regards to posting past posts and my request could be contained in a post that has my request that I do not know how I can separate it from the other postThat's a good point, thanks for thinking of that. Could you notify us using the button on the original request instead? Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 11, 2007, at 8:42:58
In reply to Re: Lou's reply, posted by Dr. Bob on July 10, 2007, at 13:35:39
> > > could you post a link to the original request
> >
> > Actually, sometimes no. This is because I am unsure as to what your new rules that were made when I rejoined the forum could mean in regards to posting past posts and my request could be contained in a post that has my request that I do not know how I can separate it from the other post
>
> That's a good point, thanks for thinking of that. Could you notify us using the button on the original request instead? Thanks,
>
> BobDr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...could you notify us using the button on the original request instead?...]
Actually, maybe not. This is because of the rules made concerning:
A. Posts that could involve a deputy
B. Posts by a member that I could have used the notification feature in the past and may have notified three of their posts.
C. My requests are now in the archives and I may find a post that I think is the first post and it may not be
D. I have followed the procedure here that says that it is fine to discuss actions you have taken and that if anyone wants to know your ratonale to just ask you by posting my request to you. The request is in the archives to you on the administrative board starting from March 2007. It is about the action that you have taken, not the poster's post. If it was about the poster's post, then I could use the notification feature and may already have done so. But this is about the action that you have taken and can be found.
You have brought the FBI into this concerning the hacking of the site. I do not know anything concerning that, but I have been receiving notifications from MSFT that could mean that the hacker has done something to my system. These notifications come up when I click on posts in the archives that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings that are left to stand.
I am in touch with microsoft and I will be talking to the FBI either if they contact me in regards to the hacking, or I may do so on my own concerning this. I am requesting for you to reply to my requests about your rationales and such. Some of those involve posts that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or lead a Jew to feel accused and/or put down. My concerns with the FBI will be related to the notifications to me from MSFT that involve the posts that I am requesting you to discuss and have the potential IMO to arrouse antisemitic feelings and your policy and TOS where you write,
A. That you do what is in your thinking what will be good for the community as a whole
B. That you use the doctrine of fairness in your decisions
C. That you use the concept of "reasonable" in that deputies do not have to intercede per a request from a member to do so. I am unsure if you are taking the position here that it is also "reasonable" for you to take the periods of time that you have taken to reply to me per my request to state your rationale or to discuss the actions that you have taken.
D. That you ask the members to trust what you do here
E. That your rule here is that a post is uncivil if it could lead someone to feel accused or put down and I feel accused and put down as a Jew when I read some posts here that have statements the have been used for centuries and are listed in authoritative books as statements that are considered to have the potential to lead a Jew to feel accused or to have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings and have been used in historical propaganda against Jews and are allowed to stand when your policy is that posts that could lead a Jew to feel accused or put down are uncivil.
If anyone interested in seeing what these posts in question are, and the authoritative books that list these statements as those that have been used for centuries that have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, you could email me
Lou PIlder
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 12, 2007, at 8:02:31
In reply to Lou's reply to DR. Hsiung's reply to Lou-FBI-rco » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on July 11, 2007, at 8:42:58
> > > > could you post a link to the original request
> > >
> > > Actually, sometimes no.
> >
> > Could you notify us using the button on the original request instead?
>
> Actually, maybe not.OK, how about if you email me? Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 14, 2007, at 10:44:39
In reply to Re: Lou's reply, posted by Dr. Bob on July 12, 2007, at 8:02:31
> > > > > could you post a link to the original request
> > > >
> > > > Actually, sometimes no.
> > >
> > > Could you notify us using the button on the original request instead?
> >
> > Actually, maybe not.
>
> OK, how about if you email me? Thanks,
>
> BobDr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...email me?...]
I have done that. The grammatical structure of your reply to me could mean that there is an expectation of a timely reply to me because of my satifying your request to me.
Lou
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 14, 2007, at 16:32:26
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung's reply to Lou-cntgtno » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on July 14, 2007, at 10:44:39
> > > > > > could you post a link to the original request
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, sometimes no.
> > > >
> > > > Could you notify us using the button on the original request instead?
> > >
> > > Actually, maybe not.
> >
> > OK, how about if you email me? Thanks,
> >
> > Bob
>
> Dr. Hsiung,
> You wrote,[...email me?...]
> I have done that. The grammatical structure of your reply to me could mean that there is an expectation of a timely reply to me because of my satifying your request to me.
> LouDR. Hsiung,
If you are going to post a reply to me because I emailed what you requested of me to do, then I am requesting that you reply to what is in question here before you reply to any of my other requests. If you could, then I think that your reply could also be a reply that could be for some of the other requests of mine.I am asking for your reply ASAP because of the nature of that post and and some other post's potential IMO to arrouse antisemitic feelings and/or lead a Jew to feel accused or put down.
In relation to if one match could start a forest fire, I believe that statements of the nature in question could. Then if there is a fire burning, it could spread here and to other forums and communities. And if there is not a fire burnning, then there is IMO the potentisl for a fire to occur later depending on what fuel could have the potential IMO to be added.
For that reason,I am hoping that you consider my sending you the email that you requested to satify al that is needed to post your reply here and that you will accept the opportunity to have dialog with me here concerning the post in question, and the action that you have taken, and your rationale, soon.
For those that couold be interested in this discussion and would like to know of the post that I emailed to Dr. Hsiung, you could email if you like.
Lou PIlder
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.