![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 15 to 39 of 50. Go back in thread:
Posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 6:18:28
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » ggggg123, posted by Tomatheus on November 7, 2010, at 19:46:45
ye I don't assume everybody will get them, but there is a risk. obviously some people must have a great time on ssri's, its all my opinion, you don't have to read it, read what doctor bob wrote ate the top of the page, I have an unwritten dislaimer, If it helps I will keep writing this is my truth, my opinion, at the end and that it is not the same for everybody. But one of the commmon side effects of ssri's is emotional blunting (apathy). My Theory is that the severely clinically depressed will not respond well to ssri's and may do better on a multi system targeting ad. I'm glad to hear you had a good outcome and response, if only we all could have.
Posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 6:26:50
In reply to Re: SSRI's and underlying conditions, posted by g_g_g_unit on November 8, 2010, at 2:15:25
ye I agree, I have always had add problems, but never extreme, do you think the ssri's played a part in your retarded depression? lol what you say might hold some truth, which means a percentage of people are susceptible to anhedonia whilst taking ssris, but if the dose was high enough, surely anybody would experience anhedonia on an ssri? post ssri anhedonia, is obviously more rare and maybe we have some sort of genetic predisposition. SSRI anhedonia is so widely accepted and acknowledged, psychs say that it is part of the ssri's therapeutic effect, they blunt your emotions reducing anxiety and emotional turmoil.
Posted by g_g_g_unit on November 8, 2010, at 7:03:27
In reply to Re: SSRI's and underlying conditions » g_g_g_unit, posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 6:26:50
Well, like I say, my case is unique in that I have *never* known what it's like to be able to freely direct myself towards extrinsically rewarding tasks. I would watch roommates and so forth pour through whole books in a day in utter bafflement (I would take months at a time to finish books).
I think SSRIs blunted my ability to pursue pleasurable activities (where I could naturally concentrate easier), so I was always just kind of left in this weird fog.
I spent forever demonizing them, but there's no way they're responsible for my depression (I never stayed on any long enough to suffer any discontinuation effects). I guess they just work better as a temporary adjunct for people who were able to function normally prior to depression, and don't have some chronic condition like ADD or OCD. I wish I was part of that population.
> ye I agree, I have always had add problems, but never extreme, do you think the ssri's played a part in your retarded depression? lol what you say might hold some truth, which means a percentage of people are susceptible to anhedonia whilst taking ssris, but if the dose was high enough, surely anybody would experience anhedonia on an ssri? post ssri anhedonia, is obviously more rare and maybe we have some sort of genetic predisposition. SSRI anhedonia is so widely accepted and acknowledged, psychs say that it is part of the ssri's therapeutic effect, they blunt your emotions reducing anxiety and emotional turmoil.
Posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 7:23:45
In reply to Re: SSRI's and underlying conditions » ggggg123, posted by g_g_g_unit on November 8, 2010, at 7:03:27
Personally I think over analysing our condition isn't helpful. Getting treatment and moving on with our lives is undoubtedly the best option. This site isn't great for recovery, getting out and enjoying life is. My advice to you is the same as for myself, I would say get on an add med, maybe supplement it with an nri and go get your life back. Retarded depression is no joke, its almost like being the living dead. In my case ssri's helped induce it, probably though attenuation, but it doesn't matter its a chemical imbalance, it must be fixed and life must resume.
Posted by Tomatheus on November 8, 2010, at 7:39:58
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » Tomatheus, posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 6:18:28
ggggg123,
My response to SSRIs was hardly a good one. I experienced rapid cycling on Paxil and Prozac and felt significantly more depressed than usual on Zoloft. The point that I was trying to make was that even though I never responded consistently to any SSRI, I did not experience any apathy, anhedonia, or zombie-like effects on the medications. Just because a person did not experience those side effects from SSRIs does not mean that their response was necessarily good.
Although I do not agree that nobody with severe clinical depression will respond favorably to an SSRI, I think that you have the right idea in stating that those with severe clinical depression tend to respond best to medications that target multiple neurotransmitters. I know that personally the only antidepressant that successfully treated my anergic depression (which used to be very severe and probably still would be if it weren't for all of my treatments) for more than a few days was Nardil. From what I understand, it is not unheard of for patients to go through one reuptake inhibitor after another with no success only to find success with an MAOI. Additionally, one review article that examined the effectiveness of the RIMA moclobemide found that moclobemide was as effective as the SSRIs, but less effective than the MAOIs Nardil and Parnate, which would seem to suggest that Nardil and Parnate are generally more effective than SSRIs.
I appreciate the time that you take to write your posts, and although I don't agree with everything that you write, I do think that you put forth some intriguing ideas and should continue to do so. I look forward to reading more of your posts.
Tomatheus
Posted by g_g_g_unit on November 8, 2010, at 7:42:49
In reply to Re: SSRI's and underlying conditions » g_g_g_unit, posted by ggggg123 on November 8, 2010, at 7:23:45
Well sure. There are times when being here is really helpful for me, and other times when it's detrimental. I would never want to speak on behalf of other posters, but it definitely gets easy to lock myself in a kind of pathological hopelessness when I spend too much time reading posts here. Sometimes just spending a few days away from the internet can be helpful. The problem is that I've spent so long like this (relatively speaking) that I'm not sure what the h*ll is left for me in life anyway. It's like stockholm syndrome.
> Personally I think over analysing our condition isn't helpful. Getting treatment and moving on with our lives is undoubtedly the best option. This site isn't great for recovery, getting out and enjoying life is. My advice to you is the same as for myself, I would say get on an add med, maybe supplement it with an nri and go get your life back. Retarded depression is no joke, its almost like being the living dead. In my case ssri's helped induce it, probably though attenuation, but it doesn't matter its a chemical imbalance, it must be fixed and life must resume.
Posted by ed_uk2010 on November 8, 2010, at 13:41:58
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » ed_uk2010, posted by ggggg123 on November 7, 2010, at 18:48:12
>I don't see many people complaining about any other drugs apart from the SSRIs.
Other meds can also cause many adverse effects. You will always read more complaints about drugs which are prescribed more frequently.....and SSRIs are prescribed much more frequently than most other psych drugs.
Posted by ed_uk2010 on November 8, 2010, at 13:46:54
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » ggggg123, posted by Tomatheus on November 7, 2010, at 19:46:45
>Call me the exception to your rule, but I never felt like a zombie on any of the SSRIs that I took.
Overall, SSRIs are better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants. They are also better tolerated than venlafaxine.
As far as emotional numbing is concerned, venlafaxine was no better for me than SSRIs. Venlafaxine can certainly cause emotional numbness.
Posted by morgan miller on November 8, 2010, at 20:42:04
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » ggggg123, posted by ed_uk2010 on November 8, 2010, at 13:41:58
> >I don't see many people complaining about any other drugs apart from the SSRIs.
>
> Other meds can also cause many adverse effects. You will always read more complaints about drugs which are prescribed more frequently.....and SSRIs are prescribed much more frequently than most other psych drugs.
>My thoughts exactly.
Posted by emmanuel98 on November 8, 2010, at 20:46:41
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » ggggg123, posted by Tomatheus on November 8, 2010, at 7:39:58
That's my experience too. SSRIs (and SNRIs) didn't hurt but they didn't help either, especially when I became severely depressed and suicidal. Parnate worked for me and still does. Not everyone is treatment resistant. Lots of people benefit from some kind of AD or AP. I think you here mostly negative experiences on this site, because people on this site are still seeking something that works for them.
>
> My response to SSRIs was hardly a good one. I experienced rapid cycling on Paxil and Prozac and felt significantly more depressed than usual on Zoloft. The point that I was trying to make was that even though I never responded consistently to any SSRI, I did not experience any apathy, anhedonia, or zombie-like effects on the medications. Just because a person did not experience those side effects from SSRIs does not mean that their response was necessarily good.
>
> Although I do not agree that nobody with severe clinical depression will respond favorably to an SSRI, I think that you have the right idea in stating that those with severe clinical depression tend to respond best to medications that target multiple neurotransmitters. I know that personally the only antidepressant that successfully treated my anergic depression (which used to be very severe and probably still would be if it weren't for all of my treatments) for more than a few days was Nardil. From what I understand, it is not unheard of for patients to go through one reuptake inhibitor after another with no success only to find success with an MAOI. Additionally, one review article that examined the effectiveness of the RIMA moclobemide found that moclobemide was as effective as the SSRIs, but less effective than the MAOIs Nardil and Parnate, which would seem to suggest that Nardil and Parnate are generally more effective than SSRIs.
>
> I appreciate the time that you take to write your posts, and although I don't agree with everything that you write, I do think that you put forth some intriguing ideas and should continue to do so. I look forward to reading more of your posts.
>
> Tomatheus
Posted by linkadge on November 9, 2010, at 6:14:44
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by emmanuel98 on November 8, 2010, at 20:46:41
I have friends who failed every ssri and then respond to something like St. John's Wort.
Tell me this, zoloft is supposedly a "first line treatment" for depression. In head to head trials it performed a little worse than SJW. Why is SJW not a first line depression treatment then?
Linkadge
Posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 15:24:53
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by linkadge on November 9, 2010, at 6:14:44
> I have friends who failed every ssri and then respond to something like St. John's Wort.
>
> Tell me this, zoloft is supposedly a "first line treatment" for depression. In head to head trials it performed a little worse than SJW. Why is SJW not a first line depression treatment then?
>
>
> Linkadge
>I agree that SJW should be a first line treatment fro mild to moderate depression, but I'm not sure about major depression. It may help in some cases of major depression, especially at higher than normal doses, but from what I have read and experienced(anecdotal), SJW is not as effective as in treating major depression as pharmaceutical drugs are.
Can you post the links for these trials? I'm interested in reading them. I think we always need to take into account bias and flaws in trials. Just like there may have been these issues with the studies on Lexapro and other big pharma drugs. Were these studies done in Germany where SJW is the first line of treatment for depression? Were these studies funded by the companies that make either Kira or Perika?
I'm also wondering if drop out due to side effects influenced the outcome of these studies. Many people drop out due to side effects. If they stuck with a drug a little longer and they found the right dose, the drug may have ended up being very effective without unbearable side effects. If the side effects were flat out unbearable, I don't blame anyone for dropping out of their trial.
Posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 15:34:33
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 15:24:53
I changed my mind on major depression and SJW. SJW should be used as a first line of treatment in all types of depression, except for those that are severely suicidal, then lithium or an MAOI should be used. My reason-if SJW happens to relieve their depression symptoms as much as 70 percent, it is definitely worth taking given it's side effect profile and other potential health benefiting compounds. If the a depression sufferer does not try SJW first, they may have never known if such a wonderful natural drug would have been a good fit for them. Also, it is possible, at least for the unlucky ones, that trials with powerful pharmaceutical antidepressants like SSRIs may make one less responsive to treatments like SJW. I would have loved to have known about the superior options for SJW years ago, though, I did feel pretty damn good and had a great time on Zoloft for several years. And, for months after stopping Zoloft, I didn't feel any lingering negative effects like cognitive impairment or worsening anxiety like many others due after they stop an SSRI. I think working out religiously and getting what I needed in my diet(omega 3s included) during and after Zoloft may have played a role in maintaining the health of my brain.
Posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 20:04:16
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 15:34:33
Morgan seriously about the SJW? My nephew said it's great for anxiety. Phillipa
Posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 20:47:34
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » morgan miller, posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 20:04:16
> Morgan seriously about the SJW? My nephew said it's great for anxiety. Phillipa
I think SJW is a great alternative and very effective for many. But so far, it does not hold a candle to what SSRIs have done for me. I've just lowered my dose a few days ago and will give Serofin(New Chapter's full spectrum SJW) another few weeks before I go back to a psychiatrist and discuss a pharmaceutical antidepressant.
Posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 21:33:41
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 20:47:34
Morgan you know I added 5mg of lexapro to my 50mg of luvox last night and feel horrible. Everything seems so boring. Will cut back and then off in the next two nights. Benzos let me sleep too much. Bioidenticals still on the wall as to keep taking or now. But the 50mg of luvox over 9 years and can't cut down. Addictive for sure. But can't take SJW without being off all meds? I don't know. Phillipa
Posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 21:53:08
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » morgan miller, posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 21:33:41
You shouldn't try SJW with other antidepressants. Some have tried low doses of SJW with their antidepressant with some success.
I thought you had been taking Lexapro with Luvox. Maybe you have been taking 2.5 mg Lexapro. If you haven't tried 2.5 mg, you may want to.
So you have the hormones for HRT but you haven't tried them yet? If you have them and your doctor is supervising and monitoring things, I see no reason to not try them for a while.
Posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 22:01:43
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 21:53:08
Morgan for two months took 2.5 to 5mg of lexapro with luvox 50mg. Nothing so stopped the lexapro. Felt really horrible two days ago so took 2.5mg of lexapro with luvox 50 and had a good day next day as medicate at night. Then last night went to 5mg of lexapro with 50mg luvox and today horrible. Of course still 5mg valium and lmg of xanax at bedtime. And the hormones bioidentical monitored by an ob-gyn now an antiaging doc who does blood hormone testing and then prescribes based on results. The compounded creams twice a day. Two years now. Only thing noticed is sleep more. Since have the osteoporosis and won't do biophosphinates and the dentist today said don't trying the new chapters bone grow and bios. What do you feel? Phillipa and thanks for responding
Posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 23:58:02
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » morgan miller, posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 22:01:43
The dentist? Really? I don't think your dentist knows what the f*ck he/she is talking about. Did they say why?
The New Chapter product is Bone Strength. Or were you thinking of Garden of Life Grow Bone. Grow Bone is one of the best and maybe the best bone supplement on the market.
Posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2010, at 18:29:21
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by morgan miller on November 9, 2010, at 23:58:02
If grow bone is the one that offers free dexa scans I heard that there were problems. False advertising or something? Visit Team Inspire on National Osteoposis chat board many nutritional products have good links on them. Very nice people there also. Phillipa
Posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2010, at 18:31:25
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » morgan miller, posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2010, at 22:01:43
Morgan meant that the dentist said stay away from biophosphinates horrible problems. Phillipa
Posted by morgan miller on November 10, 2010, at 20:45:18
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2010, at 18:31:25
I see, thought he told you not to take New Chapter Bone Strength.
What are the issues with Vitamin Code Grow Bone? Maybe I will check out the site. We sell that product at the organic market I work at.
Posted by ed_uk2010 on November 11, 2010, at 14:51:20
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram, posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2010, at 18:31:25
>the dentist said stay away from biophosphinates horrible problems.
The bisphosphonates remain a useful treatment for osteoporosis. I think it's important to bear in mind that HRT has been associated with many adverse effects. The trend towards using bio-identical hormones is interesting but it does not eliminate the risk of side effects. High levels of estrogen are not natural after the menopause - there may be an increased risk of breast cancer and other serious illnesses.
Posted by Phillipa on November 11, 2010, at 19:23:46
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » Phillipa, posted by morgan miller on November 10, 2010, at 20:45:18
Morgan from the web I think it was something to do with those free dexa scans and something else. Maybe try google. I'm thinking I read a link on the national osteoporosis board????? Phillipa
Posted by Phillipa on November 11, 2010, at 19:34:06
In reply to Re: One person's argument for Escitalopram » Phillipa, posted by ed_uk2010 on November 11, 2010, at 14:51:20
Ed I'm being treated by an ob-gyn who feels that bioidenticals after blood testing and levels. That the compounded hormones are fine. There is risk in all meds and even foods. I chose this option as being the least dangerous of the options. Visit same board I mentioned to Morgan and see real replies. When I questioned a doctor about reclast infusion that was supposed to get he got very defensive and fired me with a certified letter saying I didn't trust the med as questioned the mechanism. It is also a biophosphinate very popular here at one time although since the deaths and fractured bones, and bone spurs have been reported to the FDA oral or IV biophosphinates are not the first line of treatment for many. Osteonecrosis of the Jaw is more common in those who have had cancer but I was told by the dentist not to take the meds. So I never will. Phillipa
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.