Psycho-Babble Medication Thread 728186

Shown: posts 1 to 25 of 38. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

I swear anything norepinephrine is bad for me. Same pattern always happens. Initial rapid mood boost. Fades away. Turns into really unbearably severe depression at about day 4, MUCH worse than where I started. And I thought I started out pretty bad. With anything noradrenergic I end up saying stuff like, "more depressed than I've been in a very long time".

Why is that? I'm going to call my doctor. But I know what she'll say...I'm not yet on a therapeutic dose and you need to be on one for at least a month. But there is no way in hell I can survive this.

This time the pattern repeated with cymbalta. I am only at a ridiculous 8mg. Today was the absolute worst day in longer than I can remember. I was NOT this bad before I started.

Before my doctor chose cymbalta I told her I do respond to ssris. At least they get rid of the depression mostly. But I am left very blah with no interest or motivation in life. I told her let's get me to that point of safety and then work on the blah symptoms after that. She said cymbalta would do it all. She gave me samples. I wonder what kind of under-the-table kickback they get for giving out samples?

Looking back, nothing I ever tried worked without 5mg zyprexa along with it. Damn. I hate to think about that. I guess I shouldn't argue with results though.

Anyway, is it normal to go from very bad to reallly really really bad? Is it normal to go through that stage before you start feeling better? Is that the stage where people commit suicide shortly after starting an antidepressant or changing a dose? I don't recall ever going through that with paxil or prozac or zoloft or lexapro. Only dl-phenylalanine, adderall, tyrosine, milnacipran, cymbalta, and I'm sure I forgot a few.

What do you think? What should I do?

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by Quintal on January 30, 2007, at 17:51:37

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

I think you do need to stick with meds longer than 3-4 days to get a good idea of how they will affect you long term. It seems a fairly common reaction to ADs - my friend recently started his first psych med Celexa and his social anxiety got incredibly worse during the first two weeks before a sense of calm came over him. I've noticed this myself many times.

Are you able to get yourself in a safe place to continue the trial? Maybe as an inpatient or staying with a friend or family member if possible?

Also, have you considered trying Parnate plus a benzo? As I'm sure you know, the MAOIs can be very effective where other treatment options have failed and I found that myself. They were the most tolerable meds I've taken and also the most effective. I *did* enter a horrible panicky depression three days into Parnate at 30mg which disappeared and was replaced with a sense of vitality and well-being when I raised the dose to 80mg.

There's also the tramadol to help if you get into a very bad place and need to get out of there fast.

Q

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by notfred on January 30, 2007, at 18:52:09

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1, posted by Quintal on January 30, 2007, at 17:51:37

"I think you do need to stick with meds longer than 3-4 days to get a good idea of how they will affect you long term. It seems a fairly common reaction to ADs - my friend recently started his first psych med Celexa and his social anxiety got incredibly worse during the first two weeks before a sense of calm came over him. I've noticed this myself many times."
>

Everybody is different, but if I bailed on AD's
before 6 weeks I would be posting here that I am treatment resistant and no AD's work. Instead I have been in remission, mostly, for the last 2 decades. For me, initial effects (first 1-4 weeks), do not predict if the AD will work or not.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » notfred

Posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 19:06:34

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by notfred on January 30, 2007, at 18:52:09

> "I think you do need to stick with meds longer than 3-4 days to get a good idea of how they will affect you long term. It seems a fairly common reaction to ADs - my friend recently started his first psych med Celexa and his social anxiety got incredibly worse during the first two weeks before a sense of calm came over him. I've noticed this myself many times."
> >
>
> Everybody is different, but if I bailed on AD's
> before 6 weeks I would be posting here that I am treatment resistant and no AD's work. Instead I have been in remission, mostly, for the last 2 decades. For me, initial effects (first 1-4 weeks), do not predict if the AD will work or not.
>

Yeah, but when you get a lot WORSE? I mean A LOT? I know what side effects feel like and how they go away. This is like drug induced depression more than a side effect.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by notfred on January 30, 2007, at 20:02:16

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » notfred, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 19:06:34


>
> Yeah, but when you get a lot WORSE? I mean A LOT?
>
>

Yes. As it takes weeks for AD's to work if they make me depressed at first it does not predict what things will be like after they kick in.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by Phillipa on January 30, 2007, at 20:33:21

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

Blueberry did ECT make you more sensitive to the effects of meds? What about VNS? Love Phillipa

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » notfred

Posted by Quintal on January 30, 2007, at 20:48:15

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by notfred on January 30, 2007, at 18:52:09

> Everybody is different, but if I bailed on AD's
> before 6 weeks I would be posting here that I am treatment resistant and no AD's work. Instead I have been in remission, mostly, for the last 2 decades. For me, initial effects (first 1-4 weeks), do not predict if the AD will work or not.
>

He didn't stick with the Celexa long-term BTW. After a few months he got sick of the sexual dysfunction and the anxiety came back as low-level tension he couldn't releive.

Q

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by notfred on January 30, 2007, at 21:03:28

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » notfred, posted by Quintal on January 30, 2007, at 20:48:15

"After a few months he got sick of the sexual dysfunction and the anxiety came back as low-level tension he couldn't releive."


Sexual side effects tend not to get better over time. I tend not to have sexual side effects starting up, it takes a few months.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by laima on January 30, 2007, at 21:27:02

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

I don't know, Blueberry. If you don't respond to ssris, you don't respoind to ssris. I tried cymbalta last ywear, and it plunged me to hell within a day or so, and my alarmed doctor took me right off it, noting, ""we;ll rember you don't do well on any seratoninon reuptake style drugs, and must avoid them". I mean, Retin A-acne- that gets worse before getting better. But by what rationale should something for your mental health plunge your mood DOWN? It doesn't make sense.

 

Sorry for typos » laima

Posted by laima on January 30, 2007, at 21:52:06

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by laima on January 30, 2007, at 21:27:02

"Don't type and talk".

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by shadowplayers721 on January 31, 2007, at 1:21:50

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

No, this doesn't sound right to me at all. You know yourself better than a doc. I don't like the sound of your reaction to these type of meds. I wouldn't take them. My 1st pill of Lexapro I literally felt a difference. There is a med. I can't think of the name of it right now, but when I took it I was a lunatic. I had a very violent reaction to it. I was screaming at people and couldn't get off the couch. It was awful. I felt better with nothing. That's pretty bad in my case. I couldn't see colors.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by yxibow on January 31, 2007, at 1:51:05

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

Cymbalta can take a very long time to be useful. I think it took nearly two months before I had an epiphany of sorts at 80mg. I currently take 120mg, which, while there is no proven study that says 120 can be better than 60, nonetheless I have heard of people on that amount.

One has to also remember that MDD or any type of depression is a moving target. There will always be three steps forward, two steps back, another step forward. There's no prediction of what could happen but it is true that one has to sometimes stick it out with an antidepressant to really gain any benefits.

While you may not respond well to SSRIs, others do, and often quit before the real benefits set in, only to notice that once they quit they realized they felt better on them. That's been my experience with SSRIs at any rate.

Now nobody is saying you have to walk across hot coals for months. If a medication is really inducing effects that are unexpected, it is possible the diagnosis may be something different than previously thought. People with BP will respond differently than MDD or dysthymia, and that's the reason that not everything will work for one person.


But to answer the question, yes, unfortunately sometimes things have to get worse before they get better, and that doesn't just mean medication. Medication alone may help a disorder, but therapy and hard work with a caring therapist can make things even better and I wish the treatment models of insurance companies provided better treatment plans for people with serious depressive disorders.


- to better health

Jay

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by laima on January 31, 2007, at 7:09:08

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1, posted by yxibow on January 31, 2007, at 1:51:05


I'm not sold on "things must get worse to get better". Why? By what mechanism, for what reason? Why not aim for better rather than experiment with prolonging suffering? Notice the warnings that the pharmacy hands out with antidepressents, about looking out for worsening mood? There is a such thing as a paradoxical effect. After ssris konked out on me, any ssri or ssri-related drug struck me down rapidly- cymbalta the worst-though in the past they boosted me rapidly. Like I said, this isn't like Retin-A and acne where it must get worse first, due to it's mechanism of action. And it doesn't sound, Blueberry, like you are talking about a wave of your original depression or about any kind of disapointment over not getting a more rapid response. I'm sure you also know that antidepressents don't work instantly- that doesn't sound like the issue here. I find your response alarming, I kind of wonder if you wouldn't feel better off cymbalta. I "improved" back to my baseline depression once I stopped it on my own. My psychiatrist congratulated me for doing so, noting, "no more seratonin reuptake related drugs for you".

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by polarbear206 on January 31, 2007, at 8:49:43

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

> I swear anything norepinephrine is bad for me. Same pattern always happens. Initial rapid mood boost. Fades away. Turns into really unbearably severe depression at about day 4, MUCH worse than where I started. And I thought I started out pretty bad. With anything noradrenergic I end up saying stuff like, "more depressed than I've been in a very long time".
>
> Why is that? I'm going to call my doctor. But I know what she'll say...I'm not yet on a therapeutic dose and you need to be on one for at least a month. But there is no way in hell I can survive this.
>
> This time the pattern repeated with cymbalta. I am only at a ridiculous 8mg. Today was the absolute worst day in longer than I can remember. I was NOT this bad before I started.
>
> Before my doctor chose cymbalta I told her I do respond to ssris. At least they get rid of the depression mostly. But I am left very blah with no interest or motivation in life. I told her let's get me to that point of safety and then work on the blah symptoms after that. She said cymbalta would do it all. She gave me samples. I wonder what kind of under-the-table kickback they get for giving out samples?
>
> Looking back, nothing I ever tried worked without 5mg zyprexa along with it. Damn. I hate to think about that. I guess I shouldn't argue with results though.
>
> Anyway, is it normal to go from very bad to reallly really really bad? Is it normal to go through that stage before you start feeling better? Is that the stage where people commit suicide shortly after starting an antidepressant or changing a dose? I don't recall ever going through that with paxil or prozac or zoloft or lexapro. Only dl-phenylalanine, adderall, tyrosine, milnacipran, cymbalta, and I'm sure I forgot a few.
>
> What do you think? What should I do?


Blueberry,

As you stated above that you had an initial rapid mood boost that faded. Believe me that this type of response is very indicative of an underlying bipolar spectrum disorder. I told you about how I ended up in the psyche ward and diagnosed with severe PPD. Well, they initially started me on imipramine and my response was a rapid mood boost within the first 2 days. My pdoc couldn't believe how fast I responded. It ended up to be short-lived. Trials of various antidepressants did the same thing, only to plunge me into deeper depressions. It wasn't until after I was on a mood stabilizer that my life was normal again. I know that you have tried some MS and zyprexa seemed to work for you. I had the same problem on the SSRI's as far as apathy goes. This was not me at all. Have you tried a low dose of lithium with an AD? The reason I ask is that when I go back to my p-doc appt, I'm goning to ask him to put me on a low of Lithium dose with the lamictal and lower the effexor. The reason for this is that Effexor works great for me, but if I can lower it, It would relieve some of the sexual side effects I have encountered. I have been researching the combo of low dose lithium in conjunction with Lamictal and it appears to be very successful.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by ronaldo on January 31, 2007, at 10:46:24

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

> What do you think? What should I do?

Hi blueberry, I don't know what you should do. The only suggestion that comes to mind is try taking a holiday off meds altogether, if that is at all possible. Would that be a comfortable/feasible sort of thing for you to do?

Your brain has been subjected to all sorts of medications and maybe it just doesn't want to know anymore. Maybe your brain has developed an allergy to medication full stop. I reckon you have taken more meds than most people on this board.

I reckon you might do yourself some good if you could stay off all meds for a month say. I don't know if that is possible for you to do. Maybe this is the worst advice you can get. I don't know. I just think the brain is an organ that needs time to unscramble itself, especially if it has been subjected to some heavy-duty medication. But thats not the case with you. You are super sensitive to meds. Maybe more reason you should give your brain a rest, if possible.

Perhaps you can try a gentle taper off your meds, in the order you deem advisable. I reckon you are on five or six right now. Maybe some you should stay on. There comes a point in psychiatric medicine when you've tried the lot and then the only way forwards is backwards - less meds rather than more meds. That's my two cents worth - made it go rather a long way didn't I?

ronaldo

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by Simcha on January 31, 2007, at 13:09:32

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » notfred, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 19:06:34

Blueberry1,

> Yeah, but when you get a lot WORSE? I mean A LOT? I know what side effects feel like and how they go away. This is like drug induced depression more than a side effect.

OK, my experience on Cymbalta has been mostly positive. I can recall the first few days.

I was speedy, I sweat more, I wasn't at all hungry. I felt kind of high. This did not last. I came down after the first week and started to feel more tired, and my appetite returneds somewhat.

Now I'm at at somewhere around six weeks. I have energy. My mood is much improved. My fibromyalgia pain is mostly gone. I might ask the doc to increase my 60mg dose to 90mg because of residual pain.

I feel more like myself and not buzzed. My appetite is normal (I think). I think the celexa made me crave food especially carbs. Now I eat only when hungry and I get full faster (I think after eating a normal sized portion). Cymbalta has really done well for me. Again, it took six weeks to get here.

Also I'm on 300mg of WellburtinXL and up to 1,500mg Neurontin per day. That probably has an effect on everything too.

So, if you feel so terrible that you cannot possibly stand it and it majorly interferes with your life, then run, don't walk, (or make a phone call) to the psychiatrist to talk about it. This is the kind of feedback that psychiatrists usually want from their patients when they start a med. It gives them valuable information and, really, only the psychiatrist should make the final determination on whether or not you should continue or discontinue any med.

With most of our meds it is dangerous to stop abruptly without supervision. You could feel much worse if you stop taking a med when you really should ride it out. Personally, I don't make those decisions without seeking medical advise. I say this from experience. Yes, I can affect my psychiatrist's decisions by giving him my own input, and ultimately he's the one that knows the medication best. I know my body best so my job is to inform him about what's going on in my body when taking a med.

Basically, what I'm saying is that it would be best too call/see your psychiatrist if you are feeling so bad. IMHO

Simcha

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?

Posted by blueberry1 on January 31, 2007, at 15:13:21

In reply to Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 30, 2007, at 16:54:45

Called the doc. Said the headaches needed a lot of advil. Being at work is like being car sick with nausea. Told her my depression is worse than before I started. Told her cymbalta feels like poison to me.

She said to lower the dose and go for another week. Seems pointless. I'm only on 8mg. She said maybe cymbalta is hitting all the right receptors but that since I am so screwed up it is going to feel miserable while things get rearranged. She also said to change my mindset and think of cymbalta as the magic one instead of poison. Yeah right. Look, a med works or it doesn't, regardless of your attitude about it.

She seems to ignore me when I say anything norepinephrine makes me feel like crap. She seemed to ignore that I am feeling a lot worse.

Disappointed and hopeless at this point.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by Quintal on January 31, 2007, at 17:21:36

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 31, 2007, at 15:13:21

Have you thought about trying the normal starting dose of Cymbalta? I know that might seem counterintuitive but it's possible you need more to get the full antidepressant effect. I had that problem with Parnate where I became much more depressed until I raised the dose. It's like you get an 'awakening' which feels awful initially because you're used to being half dead. From then on you need to keep taking the AD and increase the dose to the therapeutic level if you're not already at it. What do you think?

Q

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1

Posted by Quintal on January 31, 2007, at 18:16:43

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 31, 2007, at 15:13:21

Thought you might be interested to read this:
__________________________________________________

Eli Lilly and Company had the formula for duloxetine hydrochloride patented in 1991. They began research on human subjects at 20mg by 1997. Initial trials conducted in depressed patients using regimens of 20 mg/day or less did not convincingly demonstrate its efficacy as an antidepressant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duloxetine
__________________________________________________

Q

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry

Posted by ralphrost on January 31, 2007, at 21:00:02

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better?, posted by blueberry1 on January 31, 2007, at 15:13:21

Hello blueberry,

although I understand the way you feel when you say "Look, a med works or it doesn't, regardless of your attitude about it", I believe that your confidence on your medication/treatment is also important. Remember that our brain is a complex system with multiple feedback mechanisms that affect each other. We can certainly fight something "strange" that got into our system.

The antidepressants are thought as substances that only start the healing process. Your mind is powerful, so you can really help on this process.

I read in a book (Against Depression, Peter Kramer) that some people have spontaneous full remission while on drugs for as long as months. Just like: you're listening to music and suddenly you notice you're really enjoying it, like you used to do in the past. You noticed a big difference without expecting it.

This helps me when I think about prematurely switching a medication that is promising. Sometimes I prefer to think the drug is slowly healing me and creating an opportunity for my body to take control of my health back again. And I also try to think of how long it took for me to get sick as I currently am. The recover should take a long time too, despite our big anxiety to feel fine tomorrow.

Sorry that I don't have an answer to your question, just some thoughts. Hope they help you somehow.

Best wishes

Ralph

> Called the doc. Said the headaches needed a lot of advil. Being at work is like being car sick with nausea. Told her my depression is worse than before I started. Told her cymbalta feels like poison to me.
>
> She said to lower the dose and go for another week. Seems pointless. I'm only on 8mg. She said maybe cymbalta is hitting all the right receptors but that since I am so screwed up it is going to feel miserable while things get rearranged. She also said to change my mindset and think of cymbalta as the magic one instead of poison. Yeah right. Look, a med works or it doesn't, regardless of your attitude about it.
>
> She seems to ignore me when I say anything norepinephrine makes me feel like crap. She seemed to ignore that I am feeling a lot worse.
>
> Disappointed and hopeless at this point.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry

Posted by laima on February 1, 2007, at 0:12:38

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry, posted by ralphrost on January 31, 2007, at 21:00:02


I feel like I am not on the same page as most people here? I am understanding Blueberry saying that cymbalta is making her feel markedly WORSE, not same, not dissapointed that it's not more effective, not impatient that it's not working fast enough or not well enough, or even not at all, but a "PLUNGE". Ie, a paradoxical effect. That doesn't sound good at all. I recall, she had a somewhat paradoxical effect with adderall, too. A lot of people report mood boost with adderall- witness remedyfind- Blueberry got a severe drop. Do I recall Blueberry, that a benzo, xanax was it, made you feel socially livlier? Or I might have that last example mixed up with someone else.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry

Posted by laima on February 1, 2007, at 0:23:31

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry, posted by laima on February 1, 2007, at 0:12:38

I thought I'd add, I get paradoxical effects to some meds myself. Doctor doesn't dismiss the phenomena. Chamomile tea makes me jittery-the more I drank-the worse it got, before I figured it out. Note there have been reports of people getting sleepy on ritalin and amphetamines on babble before. People with ADD calm down on amphetamines. My brother and I share paradoxical effects to some of the same meds, like some sleep meds, which make us feel "wired". Independently- we compared notes years later. Sounds like a genetic component. My own trial of cymbalta was hell. I felt lousy, and within a day or so felt near suicidal. I could hardly function whatsoever, even through a cousin's wedding. I almost didn't go, and had to leave early. Groggy beyond belief, weepy, nauseaous, achey...and sense of life as living hell. I stuck it out in good faith for another day or so before calling doctor, who, alarmed, pulled me off immediately. My mood restabilized to where it was before cymbalta. It was the wrong med for me. Note many antidepressents carry warnings to watch for worsening moods. It is possible. Antidepressents don't necessarily lift one's mood- don't necessarily do nothing, either.

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » ronaldo

Posted by laima on February 1, 2007, at 0:30:29

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » blueberry1, posted by ronaldo on January 31, 2007, at 10:46:24


Ronaldo, I like your thinking. It sounds like a good idea- find where the baseline is. Maybe try to refortify, with fish oil, maultivatims, especially Bs, antioxidants.

I was once on way, way too many meds- like 10! That doctor's philosophy seemed to be, "Not working? Let's add another one- and another...well, it's doing SOMETHING...let's try adding a couple more...this one's supposed to be good". Etc. That didn't last long, and my goodness, I was never such a mess before or since. The chaos of that doctor's plan landed me in the hospital for a few days- where they detoxed me off everything, found me a new doctor, and we started over, slow and simple. I was amazed at how much stabler and saner I felt.

> What do you think? What should I do?
>
> Hi blueberry, I don't know what you should do. The only suggestion that comes to mind is try taking a holiday off meds altogether, if that is at all possible. Would that be a comfortable/feasible sort of thing for you to do?
>
> Your brain has been subjected to all sorts of medications and maybe it just doesn't want to know anymore. Maybe your brain has developed an allergy to medication full stop. I reckon you have taken more meds than most people on this board.
>
> I reckon you might do yourself some good if you could stay off all meds for a month say. I don't know if that is possible for you to do. Maybe this is the worst advice you can get. I don't know. I just think the brain is an organ that needs time to unscramble itself, especially if it has been subjected to some heavy-duty medication. But thats not the case with you. You are super sensitive to meds. Maybe more reason you should give your brain a rest, if possible.
>
> Perhaps you can try a gentle taper off your meds, in the order you deem advisable. I reckon you are on five or six right now. Maybe some you should stay on. There comes a point in psychiatric medicine when you've tried the lot and then the only way forwards is backwards - less meds rather than more meds. That's my two cents worth - made it go rather a long way didn't I?
>
> ronaldo
>
>

 

Do you have to get a lot worse...NO/blueberry

Posted by stargazer on February 1, 2007, at 1:21:14

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse before better? » ronaldo, posted by laima on February 1, 2007, at 0:30:29

I don't believe in the getting worse before getting better logic. It just does not make sense ever to push through something that inherently feels so wrong.

I have had effects like that before, only could take 2 dose of Remeron, period. Insisted to my pdoc it was making me feel worse. And with Zoloft, I developed suicidal ideation and despite my pdoc insisting that I give it some more time, I told him I would kill myself if I stayed on it. He listened to me. That was before the warnings about AD's inducing suicidal thinking was ever mentioned. The pdocs really believed if you were suicidal, it was your depression getting worse and all the more reason to increase the dose of the med. Once Zoloft was stopped, the SI stopped.

So only you can say when enough is enough and in my opinion more negative symptoms added to an already severe depression is not the answer, it may be a hyperensitivity to the drug ,which never is considered.

All you should do is give it your best attempt to try the drugs and if they make you so miserable, then you consider the med wrong for you and cross it off and put it on the "BAD" list to not try again. It doesn't mean not to ever try it again, but not in the near future.

My trial with Cymbalta lasted 2 weeks max, one week at 20 mg felt so-so, second week at 40 mg, got more depressed, less motivated, got into bed and only got up for food,, mostly fluids and basic personal needs. That was enough to tell me it was not working for me. There are some critical periods where if a med does not improve my condition enough to warrant taking it, I have to try something that will help and if it means taking seroquel or something to alleviate my distress as a short term solution, than so be it.

My experience with meds has shown me that either a med works quickly, like the MAO's did or they work more slowly, but with minimal side effects, which can be managed with a reduction in dosage or taking Tylenol. I have severe SE's too and when my body says a drug is wrong, it is usually for a good reason.

Good luck Blueberry, I just don't think Cymbalta is not the one for you, but you have to trust your instincts on that, no one else can tell you when to stop.

Stargazer

 

Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry

Posted by Quintal on February 1, 2007, at 3:49:58

In reply to Re: Do you have to get a lot worse... - blueberry, posted by laima on February 1, 2007, at 0:12:38

SSRI/SNRI antidepressants are not instant mood brighteners like opiates/benzodiazepines. Most of the people posting here should be aware of that by now, so it surprises me to see people rejecting them because their depression and anxiety gets worse initially. Paradoxical worsening of depression and anxiety is a classic, well documented side effect of this type of medication and doctors sometimes prescribe a benzo to take alongside it during the first few weeks for this reason. It simply does not mean that the drug will never work and if people repeatedly give up trials after three days it seems unlikely they will ever find an acceptable treatment in this class of antidepressant. It's entirely possible that dramatic initial worsening may lead to dramatic improvement after the typical 2-4 week time 'lag' between starting an antidepressant and the onset of the antidepressant effect. It can then take a further month or two to feel the full benefit.

Has blueberry tried using Xanax to help him through this period?

Q


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.