Psycho-Babble Medication Thread 38824

Shown: posts 6 to 30 of 36. Go back in thread:

 

Re: My Bipolar Soap-Opera life/to tdaneen

Posted by dari on June 30, 2000, at 19:48:53

In reply to Re: My Bipolar Soap-Opera life., posted by Rockets on June 30, 2000, at 17:11:23

I, too, am BPII and though never divorced (never got married to him), I have had my ex threaten me with revealing my history of mental health issues to the court when I appealed for a increase in child support. In my particular case, it wouldn't have mattered because my ex's history of poor conduct so far outweighs anything that he could say that he doesn't have a leg to stand on. However, my attorney did tell me that as long as I am med compliant, have a network of mental health providers for me and my son and assistance in the event of hospitalization (ie family, friends) - nothing he can say will hurt me in the eyes of the court.
It's not easy being bp or any of the host of issues that I have... but I would rather be me than him any day of the week!
Take care and keep fightin' the fight! dari

ps to Rockets: sometimes 50/50 is not fair... each case is different.

 

yes perspective

Posted by Rockets on June 30, 2000, at 23:53:24

In reply to Re: My Bipolar Soap-Opera life/to tdaneen, posted by dari on June 30, 2000, at 19:48:53

Or, perhaps you are so caught up in your predicament that your perspective is just your own.. simply a desire to obtain what you think you need from the conflict. Its a common story played out in millions of homes daily. The other party is evil and the one the better of the two. It's pretty much hogwash in most cases. Just two people who can't get along any longer and are going to save the kids by fighting over them for 10 years.

 

Re: yes projection...

Posted by dj on July 1, 2000, at 16:23:22

In reply to yes perspective, posted by Rockets on June 30, 2000, at 23:53:24

Perhaps you are describing your own experience or your fantasy because you certainly have no evidence from the postings here to develop the dogmatic view that you are projecting on the scantily described situation.

Maybe you should pay attention to the rare but real and tragic situations which happen far too often where some loser stalks and sometimes kills his ex, because he can't bear his own solitude. Who is to say that this situation is not comparable? Certainly not you, based on what was described above...

> Or, perhaps you are so caught up in your predicament that your perspective is just your own.. simply a desire to obtain what you think you need from the conflict. Its a common story played out in millions of homes daily. The other party is evil and the one the better of the two. It's pretty much hogwash in most cases. Just two people who can't get along any longer and are going to save the kids by fighting over them for 10 years.

 

Re: yes projection...thank you DJ

Posted by dari on July 1, 2000, at 20:14:21

In reply to Re: yes projection..., posted by dj on July 1, 2000, at 16:23:22

> Perhaps you are describing your own experience or your fantasy because you certainly have no evidence from the postings here to develop the dogmatic view that you are projecting on the scantily described situation.
>
> Maybe you should pay attention to the rare but real and tragic situations which happen far too often where some loser stalks and sometimes kills his ex, because he can't bear his own solitude. Who is to say that this situation is not comparable? Certainly not you, based on what was described above...

Thank you for saying what I wanted to say. In an effort to be "polite", I didn't articulate how unbelievably p/o'd I was that this post became something other than that which was probably intended, a request for advice with a personal and trying sitation, not some diatribe on what is "fair" in the eyes of the court, which I might add, Rockets does not represent. Enough said. Thanks again.

 

Re: yes projection...thank you DJ

Posted by Rockets on July 1, 2000, at 23:14:49

In reply to Re: yes projection...thank you DJ, posted by dari on July 1, 2000, at 20:14:21

Nope. Not even close. I've never been divorced nor fantasized about it. But then I'm not married to either of you two.. heh. Peace out.

 

Re: yes projection...

Posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 11:45:10

In reply to Re: yes projection...thank you DJ, posted by Rockets on July 1, 2000, at 23:14:49

> Nope. Not even close. I've never been divorced nor fantasized about it. But then I'm not married to either of you two.. heh. Peace >out.

Well you have demonstrated that you have little or no imagination of varying possibilities beyond what may or may not be your own situation and that you have a stereotypical view of things. That's the point of all of the above, exchange whether you 'got it' or not.

Obviously dari did...

Sante!

dj

 

Re: yes projection...

Posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 11:59:11

In reply to Re: yes projection..., posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 11:45:10

Nope again. But you are turning nasty and projecting your own desire for how you want this to appear. I simply stated the obvious.

I do apologize though for that last comment. It was unwarranted. I don't suspect you could ever bring yourself to do the same.. could you? Anyways, have a happy fourth.

 

bipolar soap-opear

Posted by tdaneen on July 2, 2000, at 13:32:49

In reply to Re: yes projection..., posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 11:59:11

Rockets, I was offended by the "Grown up" comment you made to me, however this venue is for all of us to learn and to vent if neccessary. It is sometimes difficult to decifer what is intended by what is written.


I do have other issues that I have to face, I never intended for my question to ignite such a backlash. For me, I know I am not just a competent parent, but an exceptional one. My illness has given me insight that being normal never would. I am much more sensitive to changes in mood in the people around me. I am more of a natural empath than I sometimes would like. I have worked hard to reach the level I am at. I will not , repeat WILL NOT allow that man or anyone, man or woman to use my illness as a lever against me. It is difficult a lot and it sucks a lot, but I believe that in some ways we bipolars are really blessed at the same time (brilliance and madness). We are given gifts of artistry, of spirit, or emotion, empathy, of understanding, of beauty, that the "normals" will never have. We are the ones that are the teachers. We are the ones that show them what deeper emotions are. They in many ways envy us that. Our curse is that we have to go through the darkness too. Why do you think we have such a hard time giving up our highs?

Anyway back to reality... The point is as long as I am under the doc's care I take my meds, I am dilligent and monitor my mood changes, and I understand my illness and how it effects me and those around me. I am not harming myself or others, and I never have how could this ever be used against me? I just wanted to hear from others who had been through the same. Divorce, custody, bipolar illness and all. I want to thank all of those who replied to my post , Yes, even you Rockets. No hard feelings.'Kay?

 

Re: yes projection...

Posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 14:12:29

In reply to Re: yes projection..., posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 11:59:11

> Nope again. But you are turning nasty and projecting your own desire for how you want this to appear. I simply stated the obvious.
>
> I do apologize though for that last comment. It was unwarranted. I don't suspect you could ever bring yourself to do the same.. could you? >Anyways, have a happy fourth.
Rockets,

If I thought I was being nasty and ill-informed I could and would aplogize. I was particularly annoyed by your previous response, which I did consider nasty, and my response was informed by that and may have had a bit of an edge to it. However, I blunted the edge more than I would have and did in the past.I believe that my response(s) were appropriate to your comment(s), which I believe were niggling and did not speak to the obvious but did address a stereotypical (and hopefully well meaning) and not helpful viewpoint to the specific issue addressed, so I don't believe an apology is due.

And I also believe that you don't undertand projection which is well explained in the following quote from the book: "Undoing Depression" (http://www.undoingdepression.com):

"Two additional defense mechanisms...that contribute to problems in communication are projection and projective identification. Projection means that I take my feelings, disconnect them from my conscious awareness, and attribute them to you. "You really want to fight, don't you?" People who are very thin-skinned overuse projection. They take their own bad feelings about themselves and project them onto others, seeing themselves as victims of discrimination and collecting grievances everywhere. Projective identfication...occurs, when, as a result of your projection, I really do want to fight. I catch the feeling you attribute to me. The projector and the recipient can get bound together in horribly complex webs of feeling from which there seems to be no escape.

Like all defences, projection and projective identification are attempts to resolve a conflict between our needs, our fears (or our conscience), the expectations of others, and/or the strictures of reality. I need love and intimacy but I can fear it as well. If I let someone get close, I can be hurt. I can take that fear and project it, making anyone who comes close to me seem to be nosy, controlling, officious. Projection and projective identification can distort reality to a destructive, uncomfortable degree. And because they are so much a part of how we communicate in relationships, and because in human interactions things happen so fast that we can easily get confused, these defenses are less subject to reflective analysis than denial, isolation, or repression.

...When I assume I understand you without sufficient basis in reality, the cause can be either projection or projective identification. I think I can read your mind. I become convinced that I know what you really mean, despite all your attempts at claification. If I keep accusing you of really being angry at me, eventually you really will get angry at me. That's projective identification."

When I assume that you understand me, it's also a process of projection. When I become hot and bothered because I feel convinced I've made my wishes clear and you just stubbornly refuse to understand, I'm not communicating anything except my stubborness. These irrational sensations of knowing with perfect clarity exactly what the other person is thinking are sure indications of projection. They're fueled by emotions, not logic.

What we have to do, naturally, is check our assumptions."

And I could be wrong, as I am over tired and my concentration on this whole issue is somewhat distracted, at this moment. So if I've misinterpreted or misconstrued or lost track of the core issues in any of the above exchange(s) I apologize for that. However, I do believe my tone was balanced and generally respectful, if a bit direct and challenging to you, overall.

Regardless, of all of the above I do wish you and all of my Southern neighbours a happy Independence Day. Ours was yesterday...and on a metaphysical level it's everyday.

Sante! (french for health)

dj - a proud though not mindless Canadian

 

righto

Posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 15:53:45

In reply to Re: yes projection..., posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 14:12:29

to tdaneen: yes and thank you.

to dj: Hah! You need more counseling.

 

Re: righto, Rockets

Posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 16:35:56

In reply to righto, posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 15:53:45

> to tdaneen: yes and thank you.
>
> to dj: Hah! You need more counseling.

I'm restraining myself from being blunter but you have shown yourself to be ignorant in all senses and you are the one who is in dire need of counselling, from someone more intelligent and empathetic (as opposed to pathetic) than you, cuz you don't know what you are typing about.

 

Re: We all shine on...........

Posted by Oddzilla on July 2, 2000, at 17:56:06

In reply to bipolar soap-opear, posted by tdaneen on July 2, 2000, at 13:32:49


>
My illness has given me insight that being normal never would. I am much more sensitive to changes in mood in the people around me. I am more of a natural empath than I sometimes would like. I have worked hard to reach the level I am at. I will not , repeat WILL NOT allow that man or anyone, man or woman to use my illness as a lever against me. It is difficult a lot and it sucks a lot, but I believe that in some ways we bipolars are really blessed at the same time (brilliance and madness). We are given gifts of artistry, of spirit, or emotion, empathy, of understanding, of beauty, that the "normals" will never have. We are the ones that are the teachers. We are the ones that show them what deeper emotions are. They in many ways envy us that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I find the idea that any one group of people claims to be given a special gift of brilliance understanding artistry etc etc ad nauseum to be VERY OFFENSIVE. We are all individuals. We are all equally valuable as teachers. Trust me there are plenty of people who label themselves bipolar who are less than brilliant. The manicky part is that they believe they are brilliant not that they really are. I'm sure you're a special person. Aren't we all?
The important issue in custody is what is best for the children. It's not about you. I hope you find an impartial lawyer or counselor or somebody to represent the childrens' interest independent of you. You may be so entangled in your own needs that you cannot really address theirs.
No hard feelings-

ODDZILLA

The Gifted Brilliant Empathetic Feeler of Deep Emotion Teacher of All Lesser Beings (and if you don't agree you're just jealous :-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Anyway back to reality...

Aaaaaaaaaaw do we hafta?

 

Re: righto, Rockets

Posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 19:47:26

In reply to Re: righto, Rockets, posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 16:35:56

don't restrain yourself too much.. you might pull a muscle or something.. heh.

 

Claire 7, bbob, Odzilla, Peter C, etc HURRY…

Posted by Janice on July 2, 2000, at 22:54:08

In reply to Re: righto, Rockets, posted by Rockets on July 2, 2000, at 19:47:26

Rockets is upset!

dj, they are all the same person who originated as bbob. Every time he got upset and discovered although many people sympathized with him but didn't agree, he created a new character to defend himself. Dr. Bob tried to block bobb (I believe) but was unsucessful.

So everytime he gets angry, they all jump on the same thread. Janice.

I like Claire 7 best, although whenever I read her postings I imagine a 46 year old man wearing a dress acting ultra feminine.

•I am definately not anti-bobb - in case one of you is reading this.
•have you ever considered a bipolar II or III diagnosis?

 

Since you insist, I'll join the fray...TD and Odd

Posted by shar on July 3, 2000, at 0:22:30

In reply to Re: We all shine on..........., posted by Oddzilla on July 2, 2000, at 17:56:06

Odd and TD:

In child custody cases it IS about the best interest of the children which means it's 100% about the parents as well. If the court perceives that the children need counsel, they can appoint a guardian ad litem to represent their interests. (At least in Texas.)

I believe this is rarely necessary.

I also believe that when one is facing the possibility of having their children taken away (even if it "probably" won't happen), it is terrifying, and anger is no surprise, either.

Doubly so, because there is a stigma that can be attached to our mental health that can make the "population in general" uncomfortable, or suspicious, or wary about the person. That in itself is not a big to-do for me (what care I for my neighbor's assessment of me?). However, if I were going to court and the decision could impact my life and rights with my children--I would be mega concerned.

I have not read all the posts really thoroughly, but (unless there is ample and substantial reason to do it) telling someone you plan to take their kids because they are so unfit is mean.

I don't know who would make the best parent, but I would be dang sure if I thought it was me, I would be planning and strategizing to present a fair picture of myself, and it would be hard work and a struggle to have the self-confidence to do it (I have low self-esteem if you can believe it).

So, as to your comment, Odd, about feeling offended, well, you are special too. Survivors are special (they also tend to be extremely aware of small nuances in behavior of others). I think Dari did a very good job of describing how illness and wellness interact, and what she saw when the veil was lifted from her eyes.

I'm not bipolar (I don't think), but I am a survivor. The more healed I become, the more I can express my creativity, emotion, and reach out to the people I love. This is probably true of you, too, Odd. If not, I don't mean to offend you.

I don't think Dari was saying she was the Queen of All Things, I took her comments as her experience coming through the fog and learning to see. And showing some appreciation for what she has learned, respect for the work she has done, pride for her parenting, and it is her opinion that she has a perspective that "normals" wouldn't. If you are a "normal" I'm sure she meant no offense, Odd.

Oh, well. God bless us, every one.

Shar

 

Re: Claire 7, bbob, Odzilla, Peter C, etc HURRY…

Posted by dj on July 3, 2000, at 0:58:38

In reply to Claire 7, bbob, Odzilla, Peter C, etc HURRY…, posted by Janice on July 2, 2000, at 22:54:08

Multiple-personalities? Amazing, as they are all distinctive in postings and tonality, generally, from what I've noted... Claire 7 made a very nice comment to me below.

I had already decided to unhook myself from the provocative poke and prod that developed above, particularly after coming from a great movie, called "The Cup" about a Buddist community of soccer-loving monks of all ages. I commend it to you.

So Rocket's can just flare, alone!

Sante!

dj

> Rockets is upset!
>
> dj, they are all the same person who originated as bbob. Every time he got upset and discovered although many people sympathized with him but didn't agree, he created a new character to defend himself. Dr. Bob tried to block bobb (I believe) but was unsucessful.
>
> So everytime he gets angry, they all jump on the same thread. Janice.
>
> I like Claire 7 best, although whenever I read her postings I imagine a 46 year old man wearing a dress acting ultra feminine.
>
> •I am definately not anti-bobb - in case one of you is reading this.
> •have you ever considered a bipolar II or III diagnosis?

 

Re: Claire 7, bbob, Odzilla, Peter C, etc HURRY… » Janice

Posted by claire 7 on July 3, 2000, at 7:03:27

In reply to Claire 7, bbob, Odzilla, Peter C, etc HURRY…, posted by Janice on July 2, 2000, at 22:54:08

> Rockets is upset!

Now I'm really confused. Janice, are you saying Rockets is a "boBB character", too? If so, you really need to read a little more carefully. I'd have thought after your last taste of toe you'd learn to think before you jerk, if only to save face. Seriously, this subject seems to be becoming a bit of an obsession with you. Hope you're well. Claire

 

I am who I am and that's all that I am

Posted by Oddzilla on July 3, 2000, at 7:24:06

In reply to Claire 7, bbob, Odzilla, Peter C, etc HURRY…, posted by Janice on July 2, 2000, at 22:54:08

I remain, Oddzilla!!!!

.
> •I am definately not anti-bobb - in case one of you is reading this.
> •have you ever considered a bipolar II or III diagnosis?

No, have you ever considered paranoia? Just kidding. You're wrong about me though. Can't speak for anyone else. O.

 

You're right and everybody sing..... » shar

Posted by Oddzilla on July 3, 2000, at 7:42:30

In reply to Since you insist, I'll join the fray...TD and Odd, posted by shar on July 3, 2000, at 0:22:30

Let there be peace on Earth

And let it begin with me

Let there be peace on Earth.......

Sorry I jumped in. Romanticizing "mental illness" is one of my sore points. I would still hope that the children could have separate representation. I hope the issue would be the effect of a parent's illness on the children not the civil rights of the parent. But I hope things work out for the best for everyone! O.


>
> In child custody cases it IS about the best interest of the children which means it's 100% about the parents as well. If the court perceives that the children need counsel, they can appoint a guardian ad litem to represent their interests. (At least in Texas.)
>
> I believe this is rarely necessary.
>
> I also believe that when one is facing the possibility of having their children taken away (even if it "probably" won't happen), it is terrifying, and anger is no surprise, either.
>
> Doubly so, because there is a stigma that can be attached to our mental health that can make the "population in general" uncomfortable, or suspicious, or wary about the person. That in itself is not a big to-do for me (what care I for my neighbor's assessment of me?). However, if I were going to court and the decision could impact my life and rights with my children--I would be mega concerned.
>
> I have not read all the posts really thoroughly, but (unless there is ample and substantial reason to do it) telling someone you plan to take their kids because they are so unfit is mean.
>
> I don't know who would make the best parent, but I would be dang sure if I thought it was me, I would be planning and strategizing to present a fair picture of myself, and it would be hard work and a struggle to have the self-confidence to do it (I have low self-esteem if you can believe it).
>
> So, as to your comment, Odd, about feeling offended, well, you are special too. Survivors are special (they also tend to be extremely aware of small nuances in behavior of others). I think Dari did a very good job of describing how illness and wellness interact, and what she saw when the veil was lifted from her eyes.
>
> I'm not bipolar (I don't think), but I am a survivor. The more healed I become, the more I can express my creativity, emotion, and reach out to the people I love. This is probably true of you, too, Odd. If not, I don't mean to offend you.
>
> I don't think Dari was saying she was the Queen of All Things, I took her comments as her experience coming through the fog and learning to see. And showing some appreciation for what she has learned, respect for the work she has done, pride for her parenting, and it is her opinion that she has a perspective that "normals" wouldn't. If you are a "normal" I'm sure she meant no offense, Odd.
>
> Oh, well. God bless us, every one.
>
> Shar

 

Re: You're right and everybody sing..... » Oddzilla

Posted by claire 7 on July 3, 2000, at 8:06:26

In reply to You're right and everybody sing..... » shar, posted by Oddzilla on July 3, 2000, at 7:42:30

I have the same distaste for romanticizing mental illness. My mother is diagnosed bi-polar (I never agreed with the diagnosis, but what do I know?), and believe me, she had no insight into MY needs. One of the most important things I've learned from this board is that emotionally troubled people are as diverse as the general population, and share all the general population's failures as well as strengths.

 

Re: please be civil

Posted by Dr. Bob on July 3, 2000, at 8:50:44

In reply to Re: My Bipolar Soap-Opera life., posted by Rockets on June 30, 2000, at 17:11:23

> It is hard being grown up isn't it.

I was going to let that go...

> I do apologize though for that last comment. It was unwarranted.

...since you apologized. But then you continued with:

> Hah! You need more counseling.

So I guess I do need to ask you please to be civil. Thanks,

Bob

 

Re: please be civil

Posted by Dr. Bob on July 3, 2000, at 8:52:03

In reply to Re: righto, Rockets, posted by dj on July 2, 2000, at 16:35:56

> you have shown yourself to be ignorant in all senses and you are the one who is in dire need of counselling ... cuz you don't know what you are typing about.

> I ... decided to unhook myself from the provocative poke and prod that developed above...

Thanks. Especially because one more time will be too many...

Bob

 

Re: please be civil

Posted by tdaneen on July 3, 2000, at 9:14:05

In reply to Re: please be civil, posted by Dr. Bob on July 3, 2000, at 8:50:44

How naive I feel. All I wanted to do was ask what I considered to be an acceptable, relavent question. A question that needed a bit of background. I didn't realize that it would spark such a heated debate between the people on the board.
I would like to apologize. I feel like in some way this is my fault.

I don't feel like I have "romanticised" "mental illness" (a term I refuse to use BTW). The experiences that those of us have had make us better suited to understand many, many different circumstances. Why do we come to these stupid message boards anyway? We come here because we want to have understanding and insight from those who have been there. We want to have empathy from those who will feel as we feel. Those who emote as we do. We want to get reassurance when we are scared because we have to go another round with yet another new medication.

The usefulness of this style of forum for me (and me alone I am not speaking for anyone else) is in question. I doubt I will use this forum for anything other than for meds/side effects etc.

For those of you who actually tried to answer with their insight and empathy and experience, Thankyou. You have made this a worthwhile experience. I am indebted to you. This has been a dark time for me.

For those of you who have been bickering amongst youselves......in the future you might think about where the thread started, and what that person might be thinking.
You might start a new thread. Just a thought.

 

Re: RE: Shar

Posted by tdaneen on July 3, 2000, at 9:24:58

In reply to Since you insist, I'll join the fray...TD and Odd, posted by shar on July 3, 2000, at 0:22:30

You called it Shar. I am also a survivor.
Uncanny!

 

Re: please be civil

Posted by Rockets on July 3, 2000, at 10:21:20

In reply to Re: please be civil, posted by Dr. Bob on July 3, 2000, at 8:50:44

It will be my pleasure to comply Dr. Bob. I have never participated in a thread that ended like this yet and I have been posting for months now.

You must admit, however, that my comment was accurate even though it caused the recipient and her friends some distress apparently. My motivation for sharing an opinion was only to help. I know that by not agreeing with such people these situations can occur. It is unfortunate and reflects a lack of maturity on the part of the participants. Hopefully that changes as they, as we, get older and wiser.

I would also like to state for the record to those who bashed me here, that I am not this bbob character (whoever he is) nor do I know him.


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.