Posted by saw on October 25, 2004, at 8:17:36
In reply to Re: Side Affects of Drying Out, posted by Allen770 on October 25, 2004, at 5:53:43
A perfectly acceptable explanation was given with regard the quotation marks on the reply to the post in question (thread above). An apology, though not necessary, was even offered.
And then all of a sudden, all this antagonism and defensiveness. I don't understand.
<<"It looks to me as if you've decided for yourself that binge eating disorder is not a real phenomenon, despite its inclusion in the DSM-IV?"
Hmm . . . I think that it's pretty "plain to see" from what I wrote that I DO very much "believe" that over-eating's a "real" disease.
WHooooooo! Just one-second, here!!! I think that it's OBVIOUS that I've not "made up my mind" in regard to "anything" as it pertains to this topic; please PARDON and EXCUSE me, ma'am ("whatever . . .")!!! I mean, really: I merely was attempting to ask a question.
And this--what, exactly?!?--OFFENDS YOU in some "close to the bone" way?
Geez, I'm "sorry," but, please. Come off it!
And? I don't even know what "DSM-IV" IS, so, ma'am? WHO--exactly--is the person "posing." here, anyway, I wonder?
If you've not much to add in as far as info, URL links, &c, then, please; don't repy/respond to my posts, anymore, all right?