Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Roe v Wade

Posted by alexandra_k on September 4, 2021, at 18:19:02

In reply to Re: Roe v Wade, posted by alexandra_k on September 4, 2021, at 17:49:37

if the eligible people aren't bundling themselves up in cars with spare cans of gas in the trunk to top up their car in case they run out of gas in the drive-through vaccination clinic... then they don't really want their vaccinations -- right?

so we best be giving their vaccinations to the ineligible teenagers.

tis the kiwi way. i don't think we purchased enough doses for 'ineligible teenagers' to have doses without taking anything away from the people who were eligible for 2 doses at the time the purchase agreement was signed.

and i think that giving doses in excess of that supplied by manufacterers in the purchase agreement...

is stealing.

it isn't 'preventing medical waste' anymore than providing women access to abortions (but only after the foetus has attained a certain size / weight) is 'preventing medical waste'.


best place in the world in which to train to use a handgun responsibily, you say?

does that look like 'you have no right to involuntarily detain me. let me go else 1 (one thousand) 2 (one thousand) 3 (one thousand) BANG'.

becuase that seems like a good idea to me, right now.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:1116820