Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Psychosis as a form of knowledge? mrtook

Posted by chujoe on June 17, 2010, at 15:59:40 [reposted on June 18, 2010, at 1:00:56 | original URL]

In reply to Re: Scientology, posted by mrtook on June 17, 2010, at 15:20:44

I agree that the threshold should be high. Your idea of a living will is interesting and it might be effective for someone who was not competent but also not dangerous; if a person is dangerous to herself or others, though, I think the interests of the family and/or the state would take precedence.

The idea of stating in advance that one wants to endure psychosis as long as one is not a danger was explored in the 1960s by R.D. Laing and other radical psychiatrists. The idea was that the psychosis was a journey into self-knowledge, a "trip" in the lingo of the day. I have some sympathy for this view because I believe that even radically "other" mental states might contain valuable experiences and knowledge. (Clearly, a person undergoing such an experience would have to be carefully and tenderly cared for, not tied to a bed.) The problem with Radical Psych is that many people who have lived through psychosis describe it as hellish and the very opposite of a creative or generative experience. Joan Greenberg, the author of "I Never Promised You a Rose Garden" Mark Vonnegut, son of the famous novelist and author of an account of his own psychotic break, "The Eden Express," each describe psychosis in this way.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:chujoe thread:951392