Posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2007, at 7:21:21 [reposted on January 25, 2007, at 0:52:22 | original URL]
In reply to Re: Citizens commission on Human rights, posted by one woman cine on January 19, 2007, at 14:01:56
> Here's CCHR from the site -
>
> "CCHR was founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology"
>
> http://www.cchr.com/index.cfm/5258
>
> This falls under the hubris of religion, not medical support and education. I feel strongly that it should be re-directed.OWC,
You wrote,[...founded by The Church of Scientology...falls under the hubris of religion{>not< medical support and education}...].
Education is generally meant to mean that |knowlege| is >increased< as a result of what a person receives as to what the person sees or hears or experiances, etc.
To receive knowlege that neuroleptic drugs could do permanant damage, could be >medical<{education}, could it not? So could you identify what it is that you use to write as a resason as to why you write that[...falls under the hubris of >religion<...]which could be interpreted as being in the aspect of the serevice and worship of God?
Support could mean to {reinforce} something, but could not {support} also mean to have a |different point of view|? If there are different points of view, then could not suppport result from a discussion of those different points of view?
Also, could you clarify as to what you wrote ,[...founded by the Church of Scientology...] as to if that means to you that their stand concerning the use of psychotropic drugs is or is not {a religious issue} rather than a scientific issue?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:726227
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20070122/msgs/726240.html