Re: 1/4/5/6/7/9~well , today I am . » dReamerz

Posted by bluedog on December 23, 2002, at 5:01:10

In reply to Re: 1/4/5/6/7/9~well , today I am . (nm), posted by dReamerz on December 23, 2002, at 1:09:43

Dreamerz
You said
"well , TODAY I am".
I'm JEALOUS! did you really mean the WHOLE day? You sound like a really stable and well balanced person to me :) :) :). (Note the smiley faces....PLEASE) I can't do smiley faces properly!
Since my original post and I've already been through #1 and #4 and currently am in my #9 stage of the day.
see ya
bluedog

Thread

Do not take too seriously:) but what type are you? bluedog 12/23/02
Re: peacemaker + perfectionist (nm) Tabitha 12/23/02
type six the fortress skeptic ... Alii 12/23/02
Re: 1/4/5/6/7/9~well , today I am . (nm) dReamerz 12/23/02
Re: forget #1 (nm) dReamerz 12/23/02
Re:forget #1--the reformer? yeah status quo all.. » dReamerz Alii 12/23/02
.was supposed 2 b motivator-u get sleepzzz: ) (nm) » Alii dreamerz 12/23/02
hell..i don't know~I'll have all of em~ (nm) dreamerz 12/23/02
Re: 1/4/5/6/7/9~well , today I am . » dReamerz bluedog 12/23/02
But seriously I really am a #5 - I think!! (nm) » dReamerz bluedog 12/23/02
Sceptic/Thinker/Reformer (nm) » bluedog Dinah 12/23/02
Re: I am now nil none » bluedog dreamerz 12/23/02
Re: Do not take too seriously:) but what type are you? daizy 12/23/02
Re: artist--(Dominant Introvert Abstract Feeler ) (nm) dreamerz 12/23/02
Re: ^^^what a suprise : ) (nm) dreamerz 12/23/02
Re: Hmm definately a feeler..MeOw ! (nm) dreamerz 12/23/02
I was WRONG - # 5 is only my secondary type!! » dreamerz bluedog 12/23/02
Haven't seen any #8 types yet. Is Dr Bob our #8?? (nm) bluedog 12/23/02
Re: Please be Civil (nm) » bluedog dreamerz 12/23/02
How /when will I sleep? (nm) dreamerz 12/23/02
Re: You can dream as an outlet . » bluedog dreamerz 12/23/02
...
Ms Tragedy Queen (then even Helper Thinker) (nm) Rach 12/25/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:bluedog thread:33777
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20021218/msgs/33795.html

	for
in