Psycho-Babble Politics | about politics | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: 60% sigismund

Posted by SLS on June 3, 2013, at 6:54:55

In reply to 60% sleepygirl2, posted by sigismund on June 2, 2013, at 13:03:09

> Is that right? That the vote in the Senate(?) did not (quite) reach 60%?
> Why would it need that? Why not 50% It wasn't a constitutional amendment was it?

60% is considered to be a "supermajority" that has the power to prevent the exercise of filibusters by competing parties.

For an amendment of the US Constitution to be brought to a vote for passage, a two-thirds supermajority is required; whether it be by votes of members of Congress or by votes of the individual states. Passage of an amendment requires a three-fourths supermajority of votes; either by Congress or by the states.

- Scott

Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.

- George Bernard Shaw




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Politics | Framed

poster:SLS thread:1042343