Posted by Sobriquet Style on June 12, 2006, at 5:42:09
In reply to Re: Is anyone suggesting }} Dinah » sdb, posted by Dinah on June 11, 2006, at 22:29:01
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, said to have beheaded Nicholas Berg, although from what I know it isn't a 100% proven fact. That said, he is supposed to be responsible for thousands of civilian deaths.
Bush and Blair, said to be responsible for 42,747 cilvilian deaths at present by military intervention - and the civilian deaths are still rising year by year.
This may sound strange, but of the 42,747, is it possible that any of them were beheaded when a bomb fell on them. Just a thought.
Its hard what to know is going on and what will happen with Zarqawi's death. For instance, retaliation? Conflicting reports that an eye witness saw US troops were beating up Zarqawi after he was wounded, to reports that say US troops were trying to get him medical help..
The media and propaganda aside, the civilian deaths are still rising even though Zarqawi is not here anymore. So will the future bring less deaths from the war from now on? Will it not make any significance. Or will more deaths arise from this?
Bush's idea of peace in that part of the world, I believe will not happen in the time scale he thinks, if it does happen, but will take at least a generation, and possibly more time until Iraq will become a popular tourist destination and people from around the globe choose to migrate there for a better a life and job oppurtunites.
Until that happens, I wonder how many more deaths will occur from both sides, either civilian, terrorist, troop or pending politicians eg Sadam. The most being civilians.
~
poster:Sobriquet Style
thread:654613
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20060610/msgs/655816.html