Posted by bleauberry on March 4, 2008, at 17:31:10
In reply to Re: bleauberry, posted by cumulative on March 3, 2008, at 7:00:08
> I know the anti-D group you mentioned. I don't buy it at all. There's a good discussion on imminst.
Yeah, me too. I did spend an hour or so reading a bunch of their stuff. It tends to make sense in some ways, but then my gut instinct says it is nonsense. It is so scientifically detailed I doubt even 1% of professionals out there could even begin to understand what it all means. I mean, if someone is going to have a good reason why vitamin D is bad, they had better at least be able to explain it in a way where any regular person could understand it. Even if it is legit, I have read the horror stories of people taking the drugs in that protocol. Not only is the avoiding D thing a major problem in every day living, but the effects of those drugs is downright devastating. People get so sick they can't even work or function, and yet they are expected to wait it out for months on end to reach the supposed successful end.
What I found real interesting was that a good number of their patients left and went back to chelation treatments. Ahhh, chelation. The true cause of whacko immune systems? I don't think it is vitamin D. If it is, it is only a sidenote caused by something else. That something else is mercury and lead. Those people who left the study to back to chelation were, in my opinion, extremely smart wise people. They truly understand the root cause of perplexing illnesses of all kinds. The hidden deceptive powerful culprit is Hg, not D.
poster:bleauberry
thread:814926
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20080110/msgs/816198.html