Posted by Meri-Tuuli on March 13, 2007, at 16:37:32
In reply to omega-3 more readily absorbed from whole fish, posted by Larry Hoover on March 13, 2007, at 9:37:56
Those Norwegians.
Well. I suppose its a good study? The thing is, the Norwegian salmon industry is huge here in Europe, so of course they're going to come out with eating the fish is better than taking the fish oil. I *think* fish oil is produced more from sardines than salmon. Do they have a study comparing the omega 3 content of farmed vs wild fish?
Anyway, I guess eating the fish is more natural than taking the fish oil supplements. Don't you always advise taking the oil with your fattiest meal of the day? Sounds sensible to me.
Well only a couple of days ago I ate a nice piece of Norweigian salmon in the student cafeteria, whilst trying not to panic about the possible mercury content....going 'this is good for me, this is good for me'.... hehehe.
Kind regards
Meri
poster:Meri-Tuuli
thread:740664
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20070201/msgs/740772.html