Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply-new poster's perception-effort/afford

Posted by Lou Pilder on March 31, 2012, at 9:41:10

In reply to Lou's reply-new poster's perception-two standards? » wearytraveler, posted by Lou Pilder on March 31, 2012, at 8:52:59

> > Lou,s
> >
> > I appreciate your concern. If it's any consolation, there are other sites that are far more likely to transmit a message that anti-semitism is okay (which it's not by any means as far as I'm concerned).
> >
> > A failure to resolve your concerns won't in the strictest sense prevent people who read this forum from drawing the conclusions you reference. What is more likely is that failure to resolve the concerns will cause those who read these forums to recognize that there are concerns that have not been resolved, thereby reducing the likelihood that some readers will consider this a reliable source of support and education. I can't speak for any other readers, but I might count as one such reader, though there are other concerns in addition to yours (as I noted in earlier posts) that inform my calculation of the value of this site for support and education. If I'm one, it's reasonable and sane to allow that there may be others who hold views like my own.
> >
> > The Internet is not a perfectly self-regulated marketplace of ideas, but there is a degree of self-regulation at work. The administrator here is forced, by those self-regulating dynamics, to choose between appealing to a wider audience by figuring out which concerns need to be resolved to make the forum appeal to a wider audience, or to accept a smaller readership that might have a lower regard for the forum as a source of support and education because of unresolved appeals for consistent administrative behavior.
> >
> > As I hope you've discerned from my posts in this thread, I hold in high regard your persistent efforts to work within available policy mandates to express your concerns here. My greatest other concern in that regard would be similar to the concern I hold for anyone who endeavors on such a mission. I would hope you don't invest more effort in sharing your concerns than you can afford to bear. Perhaps only you know how to measure that appropriate level of effort.
>
> wearytraveler,
> You wrote,[...work within available policy...].
> This is also one of my concerns here. If you could comment from your perspective here, then I could have the perception from one that has not been part of the major body of posters here.
> In this post from here, there is the concept or not of {encouragement} by the administrator. This {encouragement} is far different from a third party poster posting from their own perspective, for if there is encouragement from the administration concerning Jews here, that is something that I would like to know if you see that or not. There is also the concept of {two standards} as to if that concept is or is not evident to someone like yourself that has not been a frequent poster here. One of the issues here is if you do or do not see an enouragement by the administrator to the other members here that could (redacted by respondent).
> To see this post, go to the bottom of this page to the search box and type in:
> [admin,7968,RE:please be].
> In that post, could you comment on:
> A. Can there be thought that there are two standards here in relation to the foundation of Judaism and the foundation of a lot of Christiandom groups?
> B. In.[to those that obey him} could not a reasonable person think that thearfore those that do not obey (redacted by respondent)?
> C. Could not members that read that post have a perception of Jews as a result of what is posted by the owner of this site to me there? If so, what perception could there be of Jews as a result of one reading what the owner of the site posts there?
> D. In your opinion, what light could Judaism be cast in, to some that read that post?
> E. (redated by respondent)
> I know this could be difficult to read, but there are prohibitions made to me here by the administration that prohibit me from posting what I would like to conerning my perception of what the owner here has posted to me.
> Lou

wearytraveler,
You wrote onerning my efforts here and what I an afford. here is a post that ould give more light on that. If you ould read it, then I would appreiate any comments that you have in relation to this situaion that I find myself in here.
Lou
To see this post:
A. Go to the search box at the bottom of this page.
B. Type in:
[admin, 1004189]
If there is more than one, phoargdspahyx is in the subject line

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:1010543
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1014641.html