Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 8, 2007, at 19:23:58
In reply to Re: cap on Name changes » Fallen4MyT, posted by gardenergirl on January 8, 2007, at 11:13:45
> > > > I myself am not assuming. I do not know who may be assuming. I feel some may be assuming that names are changed for valid reason only.
> > >
> > > How do you determine what's valid and what's not?
> > >
> > > gg
> >
> >
> > GG I did not state I have determined one way or another I said MAY have...
>
> Actually, you said you didn't know who *may* be *assuming*. Your use of "may" in this case is not modifying "valid". Hence, my question.
>
> > I feel there may be valid reasons and their may be not so valid reasons.
>
> Again, then, what determines what's a "valid" reason and what's a "not so valid" reason?
>
> >...and too many could lead someone to avoid working on the issues that create within them a need for a name change.
>
> Similarly, how is someone else's alleged "issue that creates within them a need for a name change" a problem for anyone else? Who are we to decide that rules should be made to help others address their "issues"? Or that someone else should address their own "issues" at all?
>
> I'm uncomfortable with this line of reasoning as justification of a new rule change.
>
> gg
>
>
>One could wonder who are we to reason there isn't a need for a cap! WE have all had a say in many rules on here..who are we to say on anything in here at all really? How is this suggestion any different? Dr Bob has stated he is open to the subject. I feel that is enough reason to consider it.
It's Dr Bob's site and his call. I will not debate nor argue as that would not be civil and I am bound by the rules.
I am stating my feelings and opinions as well as beliefs. I understand some do not agree you being one GG
poster:Fallen4MyT
thread:717507
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/720606.html