Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 7, 2007, at 0:19:16
In reply to Re: cap on Name changes, posted by Dr. Bob on January 6, 2007, at 4:30:28
3 Is fine so is 5. I wonder and feel that no matter what number you choose some will have issues with it and some won't.
You could pick a number out of a hat.
I do like your reasoning on so many other things having a 3 figure to them thus it may be easier to remember for posters. I, myself would be more in favor of 3 times a year but 3 times ever could work.
I do not personally see if someone chose a name they were not fond of later how this rule could harm them in that they would be able to adjust it to one they like within 3 attempts. If someone were stalked I can see an exception made time number 4.
Some change their names MANY MANY times within a year ( I cannot post who as that may lead someone to feel put down and accused).. but I have seen this. They make it clear they are NOT being stalked, their family has NOT FOUND them....they answer to their real name...so why would someone change their name so often? I feel those types of name changes are the issue here. I wonder if it's a lot of busy work for you Dr Bob...do you think it COULD BE attention seeking?
Some sites do NOT allow you to change your name at all ...it's a rare exception to be able to do that.I can see why.
> > > 3 total would be easier for the server...
> >
> > Three total...ever?
>
> Well, 3 starting from whenever the policy takes effect?
>
> > I'm still curious as to your reasoning behind picking three. Is it as everyone else has said? You just like the number?
>
> It was Gabbi's suggestion. :-) Would 5 be better? 3 might be easier to remember, since other policies use 3...
>
> > I'm wondering though, if this is still a decision that's up for discussion.
>
> It's still up for discussion. Everything's always up for discussion. :-)
>
> Bob
poster:Fallen4MyT
thread:717507
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061228/msgs/720053.html