Posted by Lou Pilder on August 14, 2006, at 5:59:29
In reply to Re: Lou's suggestion » Lou Pilder, posted by crazy teresa on August 13, 2006, at 22:49:19
ct,
You wrote,[...is there some way..not let the rules..clairification of...thoughts behind the rules bother you...I ...find...them...not hard to follow..annoying...].
Paying a tax on tea would be a rule that would not be hard to follow? Sitting in the back of the bus would not be a rule hard to follow? Wearing a Badge of Shame would not be a rule hard to follow?
Does not the the rule now says that I can not have any way at all to address the administration concerning posts that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or that could foster defamation toward Jews and me as a Jew on the forum? I can not post the URL or email Dr. Hsiung if the person posting such was someone that over the years I have requested 3 times for their posts to be addressed and Dr. Hsiung has said that the statements were acceptable in his thinking. Thearfore, does not the rule say that those posters in that catagory can post quotes of statements that have been used for 2000 years by antisemites to justify their murder of Jewish children and I will be expelled from the community if I ask the administration to adress the statement?
Not having any way to address the administration is one thing, but it is a greater thing to be threatened with expulsion if you ask about what could arrouse antisemitic feelings that was posted by one that you have already requested 3 other statements to be addressed and Dr. Hsiung has said that his thinking is that the statements are acceptable. In what country is asking about the administration's thinking deemed to be a crime worthy of ostracism?
You asked me. I ask you, is there not some way that the administration could allow me to ask them if a statement has the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or to foster defamation toward Jews and me as a jew on this forum and not block me for asking? I ask you, what are the thoughts behind the rules? I ask you, what was the thought behind the rule to make Jews wear a Badge of Shame? It was easy to follow, was it not? What was behind the rule to make Rosa Parks sit in the back of the bus? It was easy to follow, was it not? What do you think is behind a rule that keeps me from asking the administration to address statements that say that the Jews killed Christ and will charge me as being uncivil if I ask?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:676096
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/676261.html