Posted by Lou Pilder on December 18, 2004, at 8:27:31
Dr. Hsiung,
I am not in this post requesting that you make a determination as to the acceptability or not of the following. I am requesting that you delete the post in question even if it is acceptable in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
The poster writes,[...It was in God's plan to destroy the sacrificial system (which is still not in existance) to make way for the New Covenant in Jesus, but the jewish establishment codified their own system of of rightiousness in the Talmud, which was far removed from ancient Judaism...].
One of my concerns in the post in question is that the poster writes,[...It was in God's plan...]. I am not asking you to determine if the foundation of a faith is acceptable to be posted here or not. I am requesting that the post be deleted even if the foundation is acceptable here to be posted.I am asking that the post be deleted not because of whether it is acceptable or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum, but because the statements in question, IMO, have the potential to arrouse the doctrine of "replacement theology" which may or may not be allowed here to be posted, but I could feel more welcome here if statements that could have the potential to bring up that doctrine were deleted.
If you are going to deny my request to you for you to delete the post in question, could we invite a, perhaps, psychologist to write about whether the post is something that is or is not conducive to good mental health to some on a mental health forum. Perhaps you could invite , lets say, John Grohol like you did with Kali Munro or you could allow me to invite a representative from the Anti Defamation League to comment on the statements in question.
Lou PIlder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20041120/msgs/431015.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:431168
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041218/msgs/431168.html