Posted by Lou Pilder on August 21, 2003, at 8:26:47
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to NikkiT2's post » Lou Pilder, posted by NikkiT2 on August 21, 2003, at 8:03:52
NikkiT2,
First, thank you for pointing out that others in this thread have taken what I have written out of context in an attempt to defame me.
But your statement,"Lou, you are a nasty piece of work", was not anything out of context for you wrote that about me. Your attempt to ligitimise your defamation toward me by saying that you are allowed to do so here is blatently against the rules here for the rule has been always to not hurt others even if you think your's were hurt.
I consider your claim of innocemce because of what you wrote to constitute what is called a pretext and I consider it a transparrent attempt to gain sympathy when no sympathy is deserverd. If we were allowed to defame others here on your basis, then anyone could manufacture their own reason to commit defamation and the moderator's code has a provision to not allow that. But he did allow it, and that has caused you, perhaps to feel that you had a ligitimasy to commit defamation. I am not a nasty peice of work. I am made by my God in His image and if you say that I am a nasty piece of work, then you are also saying that my God is the same.
You may have a position of favor here to be allowed to commit defamation toward me here and not be stopped from posting, even after you were told to be civil preceding this post in question in another post that you defamed me in. But it is this allowing of such here that I am trying to stop. For when the moderator does not enforce his own rules equally, then we have a community run by the whims and predudices of such and that is what I am trying to change because I feel that it is an unsound mental health practice to allow descrimination and/or favoritism, for descrimination is uncivil.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:252280
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030808/msgs/252698.html