Re: nytimes article - anyone read this? » Lamdage22

Posted by SLS on January 29, 2016, at 12:31:44

In reply to Re: nytimes article - anyone read this?, posted by Lamdage22 on January 29, 2016, at 11:38:26

> Thanks for posting.
>
> It seems neurogenesis is the opposite of pruning?
>
> Then maybe Rapastinel and NRX-1074 are actually GOOD for schizophrenia.
That's an excellent idea. I hadn't thought of that. However, these drugs would have to perform in locations other than the hippocampus and restricted areas of subcortical white matter.
I think the idea is to turn off or replace the damaging C4 gene or block the actions of its expressed protein. It might be some sort of autoimmune thing.

- Scott
Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.
- George Bernard Shaw

Thread

nytimes article - anyone read this? stan_the_man70 1/29/16
Re: nytimes article - anyone read this? SLS 1/29/16
Re: nytimes article - anyone read this? Lamdage22 1/29/16
Re: nytimes article - anyone read this? » Lamdage22 SLS 1/29/16
Re: nytimes article - anyone read this? Brot 1/30/16
Re: nytimes article - anyone read this? » stan_the_man70 Horse 1/30/16

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:SLS thread:1085773
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20151225/msgs/1085784.html